Ontario Securities Commission Bulletin
Issue 32/51 - December 18, 2009
Ont. Sec. Bull. Issue 32/51
• Current Proceedings before the Ontario Securities Commission
• CSA Staff Notice 62-305 -- Varying the Terms of Take-Over Bids
• OSC Notice 51-717 -- Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure
• Chi-X Canada ATS Limited Notice of Proposed Changes
• Notice and Request for Feedback -- Proposed Changes to the Operations of Chi-X Canada ATS Limited
• Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc.
• Arise Technologies Corporation and Haverstock Master Fund, Ltd.
• Selkirk Metals Corp. -- s. 1(10)
• Big 8 Split Inc. and TD Securities Inc.
• Invesco Trimark Ltd. and Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.
• Irwin Boock et al. -- ss. 127, 127.1
• Gold-Quest International et al. -- ss. 127(1), 127(8)
• Gold-Quest International et al. -- s. 127
• ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. -- s. 144
• JovInvestment Management Inc. and ProShare Advisors LLC -- ss. 78(1), 80 of the CFA
• Temporary, Permanent & Rescinding Issuer Cease Trading Orders
• Temporary, Permanent & Rescinding Management Cease Trading Orders
• MFDA Announces Date of Hearing on the Merits in the Matter of Kevin Desbois
• MFDA Sets Date for Hearing on the Merits in the Matter of Jeffrey Levy
• MFDA Adjourns Hearing on the Merits in the Matter of Carmine Mazzotta
• Spartan Fund Management Inc. (formerly Alpha Funds Management Inc. ) -- s. 213(3)(b) of the LTCA
• Highwater Capital Management Corp. -- s. 213(3)(b) of the LTCA
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current Proceedings Before The Ontario Securities Commission
DECEMBER 18, 2009
CURRENT PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE
ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION
Unless otherwise indicated in the date column, all hearings will take place at the following location:
The Harry S. Bray Hearing RoomOntario Securities CommissionCadillac Fairview TowerSuite 1700, Box 5520 Queen Street WestToronto, OntarioM5H 3S8
Telephone: 416-597-0681 |
Telecopier: 416-593-8348 |
|
|
CDS |
TDX 76 |
Late Mail depository on the 19th Floor until 6:00 p.m.
THE COMMISSIONERS
W. David Wilson, Chair |
-- |
WDW |
James E. A. Turner, Vice Chair |
-- |
JEAT |
Lawrence E. Ritchie, Vice Chair |
-- |
LER |
Sinan Akdeniz |
-- |
SA |
James D. Carnwath |
-- |
JDC |
Mary G. Condon |
-- |
MGC |
Margot C. Howard |
-- |
MCH |
Kevin J. Kelly |
-- |
KJK |
Paulette L. Kennedy |
-- |
PLK |
David L. Knight, FCA |
-- |
DLK |
Patrick J. LeSage |
-- |
PJL |
Carol S. Perry |
-- |
CSP |
Charles Wesley Moore (Wes) Scott |
-- |
CWMS |
SCHEDULED OSC HEARINGS
December 21-23, 2009, January 11-18, January 20-29, 2010 |
Rene Pardo, Gary Usling, Lewis Taylor Sr., Lewis Taylor Jr., Jared Taylor, Colin Taylor and 1248136 Ontario Limited |
|
s. 127 |
||
10:00 a.m. |
||
M. Britton / J. Feasby in attendance for Staff |
||
January 19, 2010 |
Panel: JDC/KJK |
|
2:00 p.m. |
||
January 7, 2010 |
Paul Iannicca |
|
s. 127 |
||
10:00 a.m. |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
January 7, 2010 |
Nest Acquisitions and Mergers and Caroline Frayssignes |
|
10:00 a.m. |
s. 127(1) and 127(8) |
|
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: CSP |
||
January 7, 2010 |
IMG International Inc., Investors Marketing Group International Inc., and Michael Smith |
|
10:00 a.m. |
||
s. 127 |
||
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: CSP |
||
January 8, 2010 |
Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd. (Nevada), Sulja Bros. Building Supplies Ltd., Kore International |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Management Inc., Petar Vucicevich and Andrew DeVries |
|
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
M. Britton in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: JEAT |
||
January 11, 2010 |
Firestar Capital Management Corp., Kamposse Financial Corp., Firestar Investment Management Group, |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Michael Ciavarella and Michael Mitton |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
January 12, 2010 |
Shallow Oil & Gas Inc., Eric O'Brien, Abel Da Silva, Gurdip Singh |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Gahunia aka Michael Gahunia and Abraham Herbert Grossman aka Allen Grossman |
|
s. 127(7) and 127(8) |
||
M. Boswell in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
January 12, 2010 |
Abel Da Silva |
|
s.127 |
||
10:30 a.m. |
||
M. Boswell in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
January 14, 2010 |
Coventree Inc., Geoffrey Cornish and Dean Tai |
|
10:00 a.m. |
s. 127 |
|
J. Waechter in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: JEAT |
||
January 15, 2010 |
W.J.N. Holdings Inc., MSI Canada Inc., 360 Degree Financial Services Inc., Dominion Investments Club |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Inc., Leveragepro Inc., Prosporex Investment Club Inc., Prosporex Investments Inc., Prosporex ltd., Prosporex Inc., Networth Financial Group Inc., Networth Marketing Solutions, Dominion Royal Credit Union, Dominion Royal Financial Inc., Wilton John Neale, Ezra Douse, Albert James, Elnonieth "Noni" James, David Whitely, Carlton Ivanhoe Lewis, Mark Anthony Scott, Sedwick Hill, Trudy Huynh, Dorlan Francis, Vincent Arthur, Christian Yeboah, Azucena Garcia, Angela Curry and Prosporex Forex SPV Trust |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Daley in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: CSP |
||
January 18, 2010; |
New Life Capital Corp., New Life Capital Investments Inc., New Life |
|
January 20-29, 2010 |
Capital Advantage Inc., New Life Capital Strategies Inc., 1660690 Ontario Ltd., L. Jeffrey Pogachar, |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Paola Lombardi and Alan S. Price |
|
January 19, 2010 |
s. 127 |
|
S. Kushneryk in attendance for Staff |
||
2:30 p.m. |
||
Panel: DLK/MCH |
||
January 19, 2010 |
Borealis International Inc., Synergy Group (2000) Inc., Integrated Business Concepts Inc., Canavista |
|
2:30 p.m. |
Corporate Services Inc., Canavista Financial Center Inc., Shane Smith, |
|
January 20 -- February 1, 2010; |
Andrew Lloyd, Paul Lloyd, Vince Villanti, Larry Haliday, Jean Breau, Joy Statham, David Prentice, Len |
|
February 3-12, 2010 |
Zielke, John Stephan, Ray Murphy, Alexander Poole, Derek Grigor and Earl Switenky |
|
10:00 a.m. |
||
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
February 2, 2010 |
Y. Chisholm in attendance for Staff |
|
2:30 p.m. |
Panel: PJL/PLK |
|
January 20, 2010 |
IBK Capital Corp. and William F. White |
|
9:00 a.m. |
s. 127 |
|
M. Vaillancourt in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
January 25-26, 2010 |
Lehman Cohort Global Group Inc., Anton Schnedl, Richard Unzer, Alexander Grundmann and Henry |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Hehlsinger |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: JEAT/CSP |
||
February 1, February 3-12, February 17-26, 2010 |
Irwin Boock, Stanton Defreitas, Jason Wong, Saudia Allie, Alena Dubinsky, Alex Khodjiaints Select American Transfer Co., Leasesmart, Inc., Advanced Growing |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Systems, Inc., International Energy Ltd., Nutrione Corporation, Pocketop Corporation, Asia Telecom Ltd., Pharm Control Ltd., Cambridge Resources Corporation, Compushare Transfer Corporation, Federated Purchaser, Inc., TCC Industries, Inc., First National Entertainment Corporation, WGI Holdings, Inc. and Enerbrite Technologies Group |
|
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
February 2, 2010 |
Paladin Capital Markets Inc., John David Culp and Claudio Fernando Maya |
|
2:30 p.m. |
||
s. 127 |
||
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
February 3, 2010 |
Uranium308 Resources Inc., Uranium308 Resources PLC., Michael Friedman, George Schwartz, |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Peter Robinson, Alan Marsh Shuman and Innovative Gifting Inc. |
|
s. 127 |
||
M. Boswell in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK |
||
February 5, 2010 |
Hillcorp International Services, Hillcorp Wealth Management, Suncorp Holdings, 1621852 Ontario |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Limited, Steven John Hill, John C. McArthur, Daryl Renneberg and Danny De Melo |
|
s. 127 |
||
A. Clark in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
February 8-12, 2010 |
Goldbridge Financial Inc., Wesley Wayne Weber and Shawn C. Lesperance |
|
10:00 a.m. |
||
s. 127 |
||
J. Feasby in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
February 17 -- March 1, 2010 |
M P Global Financial Ltd., and Joe Feng Deng |
|
10:00 .m. |
s. 127(1) |
|
M. Britton in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: DLK/MCH |
||
February 17, 2010 |
Maple Leaf Investment Fund Corp. and Joe Henry Chau |
|
10:00 a.m. |
s. 127 |
|
J. Superina in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
February 25, 2010 |
Tulsiani Investments Inc. and Sunil Tulsiani |
|
10:00 a.m. |
s. 127 |
|
J. Superina in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
March 1-8, 2010 |
Teodosio Vincent Pangia |
|
s. 127 |
||
10:00 a.m. |
||
J. Feasby in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
March 3, 2010 |
Brilliante Brasilcan Resources Corp., York Rio Resources Inc., |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Brian W. Aidelman, Jason Georgiadis, Richard Taylor and Victor York |
|
s. 127 |
||
S. Horgan in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
March 10, 2010 |
Global Energy Group, Ltd. And New Gold Limited Partnerships |
|
10:00 a.m. |
||
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
March 25-26, 2010 |
Gold-Quest International, 1725587 Ontario Inc. carrying on business as Health and |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Harmoney, Harmoney Club Inc., Donald Iain Buchanan, Lisa Buchanan and Sandra Gale |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
March 29, 2010 - |
Shane Suman and Monie Rahman |
|
April 9, 2010 |
||
s. 127 and 127(1) |
||
10:00 a.m. |
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
|
Panel: JEAT/PLK |
||
April 13, 2010 |
Axcess Automation LLC, Axcess Fund Management, LLC, Axcess |
|
2:30 p.m. |
Fund, L.P., Gordon Alan Driver and David Rutledge, Steven M. Taylor and International Communication Strategies |
|
s. 127 |
||
M. Adams in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
May 3-28, 2010 |
Sextant Capital Management Inc., Sextant Capital GP Inc., Sextant |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Strategic Opportunities Hedge Fund L.P., Otto Spork, Robert Levack and Natalie Spork |
|
s. 127 |
||
S. Kushneryk in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
May 31 -- June 4, 2010 |
Lyndz Pharmaceuticals Inc., James Marketing Ltd., Michael Eatch and Rickey McKenzie |
|
10:00 a.m. |
||
s. 127(1) and (5) |
||
J. Feasby in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
June 29, 2010 |
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership, Weizhen Tang and |
|
10:00 a.m. |
Associates Inc., Weizhen Tang Corp., and Weizhen Tang |
|
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
M. Britton in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Yama Abdullah Yaqeen |
|
s. 8(2) |
||
J. Superina in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Microsourceonline Inc., Michael Peter Anzelmo, Vito Curalli, Jaime S. Lobo, Sumit Majumdar and Jeffrey David Mandell |
|
s. 127 |
||
J. Waechter in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Frank Dunn, Douglas Beatty, Michael Gollogly |
|
s. 127 |
||
K. Daniels in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Juniper Fund Management Corporation, Juniper Income Fund, Juniper Equity Growth Fund and Roy Brown (a.k.a. Roy Brown-Rodrigues) |
|
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
D. Ferris in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Merax Resource Management Ltd. carrying on business as Crown Capital Partners, Richard Mellon and Alex Elin |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Gregory Galanis |
|
s. 127 |
||
P. Foy in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Franklin Danny White, Naveed Ahmad Qureshi, WNBC The World Network Business Club Ltd., MMCL Mind Management Consulting, Capital Reserve Financial Group, and Capital Investments of America |
|
s. 127 |
||
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Biovail Corporation, Eugene N. Melnyk, Brian H. Crombie, John R. Miszuk and Kenneth G. Howling |
|
s. 127(1) and 127.1 |
||
J. Superina, A. Clark in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Global Partners Capital, Asia Pacific Energy Inc., 1666475 Ontario Inc. operating as "Asian Pacific Energy", Alex Pidgeon, Kit Ching Pan also known as Christine Pan, Hau Wai Cheung, also known as Peter Cheung, Tony Cheung, Mike Davidson, or Peter McDonald, Gurdip Singh Gahunia also known as Michael Gahunia or Shawn Miller, Basis Marcellinius Toussaint also known as Peter Beckford, and Rafique Jiwani also known as Ralph Jay |
|
s. 127 |
||
M. Boswell in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
FactorCorp Inc., FactorCorp Financial Inc. and Mark Twerdun |
|
s. 127 |
||
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Shane Suman and Monie Rahman |
|
s. 127 and 127(1) |
||
C. Price in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Berkshire Capital Limited, GP Berkshire Capital Limited, Panama Opportunity Fund and Ernest Anderson |
|
s. 127 |
||
E. Cole in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
MRS Sciences Inc. (formerly Morningside Capital Corp.), Americo DeRosa, Ronald Sherman, Edward Emmons and Ivan Cavric |
|
s. 127 and 127(1) |
||
D. Ferris in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Barry Landen |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Imagin Diagnostic Centres Inc., Patrick J. Rooney, Cynthia Jordan, Allan McCaffrey, Michael Shumacher, Christopher Smith, Melvyn Harris and Michael Zelyony |
|
s. 127 and 127.1 |
||
J. Feasby in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Gold-Quest International, Health and Harmoney, Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan |
|
s. 127 |
||
H. Craig in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
TBA |
Goldpoint Resources Corporation, Lino Novielli, Brian Moloney, Evanna Tomeli, Robert Black, Richard Wylie and Jack Anderson |
|
s. 127(1) and 127(5) |
||
M. Boswell in attendance for Staff |
||
Panel: TBA |
||
ADJOURNED SINE DIE
Global Privacy Management Trust and Robert Cranston
S. B. McLaughlin
Livent Inc., Garth H. Drabinsky, Myron I. Gottlieb, Gordon Eckstein, Robert Topol
Portus Alternative Asset Management Inc., Portus Asset Management Inc., Boaz Manor, Michael Mendelson, Michael Labanowich and John Ogg
Maitland Capital Ltd., Allen Grossman, Hanouch Ulfan, Leonard Waddingham, Ron Garner, Gord Valde, Marianne Hyacinthe, Diana Cassidy, Ron Catone, Steven Lanys, Roger McKenzie, Tom Mezinski, William Rouse and Jason Snow
Global Petroleum Strategies, LLC, Petroleum Unlimited, LLC, Aurora Escrow Services, LLC, John Andrew, Vincent Cataldi, Charlotte Chambers, Carl Dylan, James Eulo, Richard Garcia, Troy Gray, Jim Kaufman, Timothy Kaufman, Chris Harris, Morgan Kimmel, Roger A. Kimmel, Jr., Erik Luna, Mitch Malizio, Adam Mills, Jenna Pelusio, Rosemary Salveggi, Stephen J. Shore and Chris Spinler
LandBankers International MX, S.A. De C.V.; Sierra Madre Holdings MX, S.A. De C.V.; L&B LandBanking Trust S.A. De C.V.; Brian J. Wolf Zacarias; Roger Fernando Ayuso Loyo, Alan Hemingway, Kelly Friesen, Sonja A. McAdam, Ed Moore, Kim Moore, Jason Rogers and Dave Urrutia
Hollinger Inc., Conrad M. Black, F. David Radler, John A. Boultbee and Peter Y. Atkinson
CSA Staff Notice 31-313 -- NI 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions and related instruments -- Frequently Asked Questions as of December 18, 2009
CSA STAFF NOTICE 31-313
NI 31-103 REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND EXEMPTIONS AND RELATED INSTRUMENTS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AS OF DECEMBER 18, 2009
Background
On September 28, 2009, new National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions and amendments to related instruments including NI 33-109 Registration Information came into force. We have compiled this list of frequently asked questions (FAQs) from the enquiries we have received concerning NI 31-103 and NI 33-109 in order to assist those working with these instruments.
NI 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions
NI 31-103 |
QUESTION |
ANSWER |
||||||
SECTION |
||||||||
PART 1 |
INTERPRETATION |
|||||||
1.1 |
Definitions of terms used throughout this Instrument |
How will accounting terms in NI 31-103 work with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Amendments? |
Proposed amendments to NI 31-103 necessary to accommodate IFRS were published for comment on October 23, 2009, except in Québec and New Brunswick where the proposed amendments will be published in early 2010. The comment period will end on January 21, 2010, including in Québec and New Brunswick which have issued a staff notice on January 21, 2010. |
|||||
PART 2 |
CATEGORIES OF REGISTRATION FOR INDIVIDUALS |
|||||||
2.2 |
Client mobility exemption -- individuals |
Are sections 2.2 [Client mobility exemption -- individuals] and 8.30 [Client mobility exemption -- firms] independent of each other? How do the firm and individual limits work together? |
Sections 2.2 [Client mobility exemption -- individuals] and 8.30 [Client mobility exemption -- firms] are independent of each other: individuals may rely on section 2.2 in circumstances where they are not registered in the local jurisdiction even though their firm does not rely on section 8.30 because the firm is registered in the local jurisdiction. |
|||||
The limits are per jurisdiction. For example a firm using the exemption could have 10 clients in each of several local jurisdictions where it is not registered. An individual could also be using the exemption to have 5 clients in each of several jurisdictions where the individual is not registered. |
||||||||
The individual limits are per individual. For example several individuals working for a firm could each have 5 clients in the same local jurisdiction, if their firm was registered in the jurisdiction. Even if a firm is registered in a local jurisdiction and has more than 10 clients served by registered individuals it can have unregistered individuals using the exemption in the jurisdiction. |
||||||||
If a firm is not registered in a jurisdiction, the firm may not exceed its 10 client limit, shared among its representatives. |
||||||||
2.3 |
Individuals acting for investment fund managers |
Do permitted individuals of an investment fund manager (IFM) need to file Form 33-109F4 Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals? |
Although individuals acting on behalf of a registered IFM are not required to register pursuant to section 2.3 of NI 31-103, permitted individuals of an IFM must nonetheless file Form 33-109F4Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals. |
|||||
"Permitted individual" is defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 33-109 Registration Information. |
||||||||
PART 3 |
REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS -- INDIVIDUALS |
|||||||
Division 1 |
General proficiency requirements |
|||||||
3.4 |
Proficiency -- initial and ongoing |
Has the CSA published any additional guidance relating to the proficiency requirement in section 3.4? |
CSA Staff Notice 33-315 Suitability Obligation and Know Your Product was published on September 2, 2009. It discusses the requirement for registered individuals to "know your product", which forms part of the ongoing proficiency obligation. |
|||||
3.6 |
Mutual fund dealer -- chief compliance officer |
How do proficiency time limits apply to chief compliance officers (CCO) in Québec? |
The CCO category is new in Québec. Prior to September 28, 2009, an individual could act in Québec in a similar capacity, with activities normally performed by a CCO but without however being identified on NRD in this category. Prior to September 28, 2009, the CCO or compliance officer categories existed only in Ontario, British Columbia and New Brunswick (the CCO jurisdictions). |
|||||
3.8 |
Scholarship plan dealer -- chief compliance officer |
|||||||
3.10 |
Exempt market dealer -- chief compliance officer |
In Québec individuals acting as personne responsable (ou chef) de la conformité prior to the coming into force of NI 31-103 must register before December 28, 2009 pursuant to subsection 16.9(1) of NI 31-103 and have until September 2010 pursuant to subsection 16.9(3) to meet the proficiency requirements set out in sections 3.6, 3.8, 3.10 and 3.13 as the case may be, for the following reasons: |
||||||
3.13 |
Portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer |
|||||||
Subsection 16.9(2), when referring to "the individual identified on the National Registration Database as the firm's compliance officer", refers to such compliance officers as were identified prior to September 28, 2009. This section can only apply in the CCO jurisdictions. In these jurisdictions, proficiency requirements applied to the compliance officer. |
||||||||
In Québec therefore subsection 16.9(2) of NI 31-103 does not constitute a "grandfathering" clause for individuals acting as personne responsable (ou chef) de la conformité prior to September 28, 2009. |
||||||||
As a result, there are in Québec the following 2 options: |
||||||||
1. |
If the individual acting as personne responsable (ou chef) de la conformité in Québec prior to September 28, 2009 was identified as compliance officer or CCO in one of the CCO jurisdictions, the "grandfathering" clause in subsection 16.9(2) applies to this individual. The individual is therefore not required to meet the proficiency requirements of NI 31-103, so long as the individual remains registered as the firm's CCO. |
|||||||
2. |
If the individual acting as personne responsable (ou chef) de la conformité in Québec prior to September 28, 2009 was not identified as compliance officer or CCO in one of the CCO jurisdictions, subsection 16.9(3) applies: the individual is required to meet the proficiency requirements of NI 31-103, but has 12 months to do so. |
|||||||
3.6 |
Mutual fund dealer -- chief compliance officer |
Can the chief compliance officer (CCO) of a portfolio manager (PM) whose proficiency is grandfathered under subsection 16.9(2) continue to be its CCO if the firm is registered as a mutual fund dealer (MFD), exempt market dealer (EMD) or investment fund manager (IFM)? |
Although PM CCO proficiency set out in section 3.13 is available as an alternative to other proficiency requirements for CCOs of MFDs, EMDs and IFMs in sections 3.6, 3.10 and 3.14, respectively, there is no corresponding provision that would accommodate a PM CCO whose proficiency is grandfathered under subsection 16.9(2) on the basis of different qualifications than are prescribed in section 3.13. |
|||||
3.10 |
Exempt market dealer -- chief compliance officer |
|||||||
3.13 |
Portfolio manager -- chief compliance officer |
This was not our intention, and we will be issuing an order providing an exemption from proficiency requirements for the CCO of an MFD, EMD or IFM where the firm was registered as a PM on the date NI 31-103 came into force and the individual was on that date designated as the CCO of the firm, for so long as they remain registered as the firm's CCO. |
||||||
3.14 |
Investment fund manager -- chief compliance officer |
|||||||
3.9 |
Exempt market dealer -- dealing representative |
Will exemptions from the proficiency requirements for exempt market dealer (EMD) dealing representatives in section 3.9 be available? |
We will always consider applications for exemptive relief. However, proficiency is one of the fundamental fitness criteria for individual registrants, so we anticipate granting exemptions from the EMD dealing representative proficiency requirements set out in section 3.9 only in rare cases. |
|||||
PART 4 |
RESTRICTIONS ON REGISTERED INDIVIDUALS |
|||||||
4.2 |
Associate advising representatives -- pre-approval of advice |
If a firm has previously designated an adviser to review the advice of an associate advising representative (AAR), does it need to re-designate an adviser to review the AAR's advice under subsection 4.2(2) ? |
No. If a firm has previously designated an adviser, it does not need to re-designate under NI 31-103 unless: |
|||||
• |
the firm has hired new AARs subsequent to the original designation, or |
|||||||
• |
the designated advising representative changes |
|||||||
This also applies in those jurisdictions that did not have the category of associate advising representative but imposed supervision on "junior" advisers through terms and conditions, if an adviser was designated to review the advice. |
||||||||
PART 7 |
CATEGORIES OF REGISTRATION FOR FIRMS |
|||||||
7.1 |
Dealer categories |
A. Can an exempt market dealer (EMD) trade prospectus qualified securities to clients such as accredited investors or those making a minimum purchase in an amount sufficient to qualify for prospectus-exempt distribution? |
A. |
Yes. As set out in clause 7.1(2)(d)(ii), an EMD can trade a prospectus-qualified security in circumstances where an exemption from the prospectus requirement would be available. |
||||
B. |
Yes, the EMD may provide the investor with a copy of the prospectus. |
|||||||
B. If so, can the EMD provide the investor with a copy of the prospectus? |
||||||||
Can an exempt market dealer (EMD) underwrite a distribution that is not exempt from the prospectus requirement? |
No. As set out in clause 7.1(2)(d)(iv), an EMD may only underwrite a distribution of securities that is made under an exemption from the prospectus requirement. |
|||||||
Can an exempt market dealer (EMD) underwrite a prospectus-qualified distribution if it only distributes securities to accredited investors or other clients who may purchase securities offered under a prospectus exemption? |
No. Although clause 7.1(2)(d)(ii) would permit an EMD to trade in such circumstances, clause 7.1(2)(d)(iv) restricts an EMD to underwriting permitted distributions that are, in fact, made under a prospectus exemption. |
|||||||
When will the jurisdictions that are participating in the "alternative approach to regulating certain intermediaries in the exempt market" described in Appendix D to the CSA Notice of NI 31-103 (published on July 17, 2009) issue their exemptions from exempt market dealer (EMD) registration? |
The jurisdictions that have agreed to this alternative approach will issue local blanket orders to exempt certain intermediaries from EMD registration shortly before the registration exemptions in NI 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions expire (March 27, 2010). |
|||||||
Must a mutual fund dealer in Québec or Manitoba also have to register as an EMD in Québec in order to sell principal protected notes (PPNs)? |
PPNs include the instruments commonly described as market-linked GICs (market-linked GICs) and linked notes (market-linked notes). Market-linked GICs are described as term deposits that guarantee principal through a CDIC-insured (or equivalent) deposit-taking institution, with a return linked to a number of underlying investments, including stock market indices, mutual funds or hedge funds. Market-linked notes are described as debt instruments that provide a principal guarantee through the credit-worthiness of the issuer, with returns linked to a variety of underlying investments, including stock market indices, mutual funds, and hedge funds. |
|||||||
If certain conditions are met in connection with the type of PPN being sold, registration in the EMD category is not required for a mutual fund dealer in Québec. |
||||||||
The treatment of PPNs in Québec varies according to whether the PPN is a market-linked GIC or a market-linked note: |
||||||||
• |
market-linked GICs are term deposits to which the Securities Act (Québec) applies. Paragraph 9° of section 3 of the Act provides that the dealer registration requirement set out in section 148 of the Act does not apply to term deposits. The sale of market-linked GICs does not therefore require registration |
|||||||
• |
market-linked notes are debt securities to which the Securities Act (Québec) applies. Paragraph 14° of section 3 of the Act provides that the dealer registration requirement set out in section 148 of the Act does not apply to debt securities issued or guaranteed by a bank or an authorized foreign bank listed in Schedule I, II or III to the Bank Act, except a debt security conferring a right of payment ranking lower than a deposit contemplated in paragraph 9° of section 3 and entrusted to the issuer or the guarantor of the debt security |
|||||||
PPNs which meet the conditions of these exemptions may be sold in Québec by mutual fund dealers not also registered as EMDs. |
||||||||
In Manitoba, market-linked GICs and market-linked notes are securities. The Manitoba Securities Commission has issued relief which will permit registered mutual fund dealers to trade these products without registration as an EMD. |
||||||||
7.3 |
Investment fund manager category |
When is investment fund manager (IFM) registration required? |
All managers of investment funds must register as IFMs unless an applicable exemption is available. The threshold question is whether a collective investment vehicle is an "investment fund". The next step is to identify who is the "investment fund manager" for the investment fund. Both terms are defined in local jurisdictions' securities legislation. There is also guidance in section 7.3 of the Companion Policy and in the Companion Policy to NI 81-106 Investment Fund Continuous Disclosure (81-106 Companion Policy). |
|||||
Examples: |
||||||||
A. |
I manage a real estate investment trust (REIT). Do I need to register as an IFM? |
|||||||
B. |
I manage a fund that does not invest in securities. Do I need to register as an IFM? |
Examples: |
||||||
A. |
No. Subsection 1.2(2), of the 81-106 Companion Policy provides that business income trusts, REITs and royalty trusts are not investment funds. |
|||||||
B. |
If the fund falls within the definition of investment fund, you must register unless otherwise exempt. The definition of investment fund is not restricted to funds that invest in securities. There are, for example, funds that invest in uranium or gold bullion. |
|||||||
Note that sections 16.5 and 16.6 provide temporary exemptions for a Canadian investment fund manager registered in its principal jurisdiction and for foreign investment fund managers, respectively. |
||||||||
Must an otherwise unregistered firm that is temporarily exempt from registration as an investment fund manager (IFM) under section 16.4 comply with the requirements in NI 31-103 if it seeks registration before the temporary exemption expires? |
Yes. While section 16.4 provides a one-year exemption from registration, a firm that chooses to register before the end of that period must comply with NI 31-103 as soon as it becomes registered. The transition provisions that provide temporary exemptions from certain IFM requirements (sections 16.8 [Registration of ultimate designated persons], 16.9 [Registration of chief compliance officers], 16.11 [Capital requirements] and 16.13 [Insurance requirements]) only apply to firms that were already registered when NI 31-103 came into force. |
|||||||
If a firm was already registered when NI 31-103 was implemented, will it lose the benefit of the transitional exemptions set out in Part 16 if it adds registration in another category? |
No. A firm would not lose the benefit of the transitional exemptions provided in Part 16 for firms that are registered on the day NI 31-103 came into force (sections 16.8 [Registration of ultimate designated persons], 16.9 [Registration of chief compliance officers], 16.11 [Capital requirements] and 16.13 [Insurance requirements]) if it adds another registration category to what it had on the day when NI 31-103 came into force. |
|||||||
Note also that subsection 16.4(3) provides a one-year transitional exemption from the investment fund manager (IFM) insurance requirement for a registered dealer or adviser that was acting as an IFM when NI 31-103 came into force. |
||||||||
PART 8 |
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO REGISTER |
|||||||
Division 1 |
Exemptions from dealer and underwriter registration |
|||||||
8.5 |
Trades through or to a registered dealer |
Can a foreign dealer rely on the exemption in section 8.5 for trades through or to a registered dealer? |
Yes. The exemption requires only that all trading activity that occurs within the local jurisdiction is done through or to a local registered dealer. |
|||||
On that basis, we would regard the "jitney" of a trade through or to an appropriately registered dealer in a local Canadian jurisdiction by an unregistered dealer who is located in a foreign jurisdiction as a trade solely through a registered dealer in the local jurisdiction, consistent with the exemption in section 8.5. The fact that the transaction is executed through an agency arrangement involving intermediation by a dealer in another jurisdiction does not in itself mean that the "trade" in the local jurisdiction ceases to be made "solely" through a registered dealer. |
||||||||
However, if the dealer in the other jurisdiction is engaged in other trading activities in the local jurisdiction in connection with the transaction, it would no longer be a trade solely through a registered dealer and the exemption would not be available. It is important to bear in mind that a "trade" includes acts in furtherance of a trade. |
||||||||
For example, the trade would not be solely through a registered dealer if the foreign dealer or its client interacted directly with the (prospective) purchaser in the local jurisdiction. One way this could occur would be if the foreign dealer or its foreign client contacted the potential purchaser in the local jurisdiction and directly solicited the purchase of securities. The unregistered foreign dealer should instead solicit the purchase by contacting the registered dealer in the local jurisdiction, leaving it to the local registered dealer to contact potential purchasers in the local jurisdiction. |
||||||||
Is this exemption only available to issuers selling their own shares? |
No, the exemption is not limited to issuers or sales of one's own shares. |
|||||||
Can a plan administrator rely on the exemption in section 8.5 in connection with its activity of placing sell orders with brokers in respect of shares of issuers held by plan participants? |
Yes, a plan administrator can rely on the exemption in section 8.5 in connection with its activity of placing sell orders with dealers in respect of shares of issuers held by plan participants. The Companion Policy discussion of section 8.5 is not meant to suggest that the exemption is only available in respect of trades in a person or company's own securities. |
|||||||
Section 8.16 [Plan administrator] covers the activity of the plan administrator receiving sell orders from plan participants. |
||||||||
8.18 |
International dealer |
Must a foreign dealer use the international dealer exemption in section 8.18 to trade through or to a registered dealer? |
No. If a foreign dealer's trading activities fall within the exemption in section 8.5 [Trades through or to a registered dealer], it does not need to rely on any other exemption from registration. |
|||||
A. |
Can a registered firm also rely on the international dealer exemption? |
A. |
The exemption in section 8.18 is available to a firm that is registered in a jurisdiction in Canada. |
|||||
B. |
If so, what notice should it provide to clients? |
B. |
A registered firm that is relying on the exemption may meet the client notification requirement in clause 8.18(4)(b)(i) by notifying the client that it is not registered in the jurisdiction in respect of the activities for which the exemption is being relied upon. |
|||||
If a firm is relying on the exemption in section 8.18 in more than one jurisdiction, must it file a Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service (as required by subsection 8.18(5)) with each regulator or can it use the passport system? |
If a firm is relying on the exemption in more than one jurisdiction, it must file a Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service with the regulator in each jurisdiction where it relies on the exemption -- see subsection 1.3(2). |
|||||||
Subsection 8.18(5) requires a firm to notify the regulator each year that it continues to rely on the exemption. Does that mean a firm has to file Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service every year ? |
No. Subsection 8.18(5) does not prescribe the form of annual notice to the regulator, so an email or letter will be acceptable. |
|||||||
What must an international dealer in Ontario do to rely on subsection 8.18(6)? |
To comply with subsection 8.18(6) in Ontario, a firm must pay participation fees under Part 3 of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees. By December 1 of each year, the firm must file a completed Form 13-502F4 Capital Markets Participation Fee Calculation. The firm must pay its participation fee by cheque, draft, money order or other acceptable means no later than December 31 each year. The filings and payments should be sent to the Ontario Securities Commission (Attention: Manager, Registrant Regulation). |
|||||||
8.22 |
Small security holder selling and purchase arrangements |
How should "market value" be determined? |
Where possible, market value should be determined by reference to a quoted value on a recognized exchange or marketplace. If market value is not quoted on an exchange (e.g. bonds) market value may be determined by reference to quotes that are available through brokers. We recognize that it is not always possible to obtain a market value by these methods. In such cases, we will accept a valuation policy that is consistently applied and is based on measures considered reasonable in the industry, such as value at cost where there has been no material subsequent event (e.g. a market event or new capital raising by the issuer). |
|||||
Division 2 |
Exemptions from adviser registration |
|||||||
8.26 |
International adviser |
How does a foreign adviser act as a sub-adviser to a registered adviser if dealers and advisers are not "permitted clients" for the purposes of the international adviser exemption? |
Foreign sub-advisers may continue to rely on the sub-adviser exemption that remains in section 7.3 of OSC Rule 35-502 Non Resident Advisers, and apply for discretionary relief in other jurisdictions. |
|||||
In Québec, a general exemption has been granted on December 18, 2009 on the same terms and conditions as the exemptive relief available in the other jurisdictions. This general exemption will take effect on December 28, 2009 since the exemption available under section 5 of the Regulation to amend the Securities Regulation (former 194.2 of the Securities Regulation) remains in force only until that date. |
||||||||
A. |
Can a registered firm also rely on the international adviser exemption? |
A. |
The exemption in section 8.26 is available to a firm that is registered in the local jurisdiction or elsewhere in Canada. |
|||||
B. |
If so, what notice should it provide to clients? |
B. |
A registered firm that is relying on the exemption may meet the client notification requirement in clause 8.26(4)(e)(i) by notifying the client that it is not registered in the jurisdiction in respect of the activities for which the exemption is being relied upon. |
|||||
If a firm is relying on the exemption in section 8.26 in more than one jurisdiction, must it file a Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service (as required by subsection 8.26(5)) with each regulator or can it use the passport system? |
If a firm is relying on the exemption in more than one jurisdiction, it must file a Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service with the regulator in each jurisdiction where it relies on the exemption -- see subsection 1.3(2). |
|||||||
Subsection 8.26(5) requires a firm to notify the regulator each year that it continues to rely on the exemption. Does that mean a firm has to file Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service every year ? |
No. Subsection 8.26(5) does not prescribe the form of annual notice to the regulator, so an email or letter will be acceptable. |
|||||||
What must an international adviser in Ontario do to rely on subsection 8.26(6)? |
To comply with subsection 8.26(6) in Ontario, a firm must pay participation fees under Part 3 of OSC Rule 13-502 Fees. By December 1 of each year, the firm must file a completed Form 13-502F4 Capital Markets Participation Fee Calculation. The firm must pay its participation fee by cheque, draft, money order or other acceptable means no later December 31 each year. The filings and payments should be sent to the Ontario Securities Commission (Attention: Manager, Registrant Regulation). |
|||||||
Do revenues derived from "portfolio management activities" under paragraph 8.26(4)(d) include revenues from sub-advisory activities? |
Yes, in making the calculation required under paragraph 8.26(4)(d), it is necessary to include all revenues derived from portfolio management activities in Canada, which would include any sub-adviser arrangements. |
|||||||
Division 4 |
Mobility exemption -- firms |
|||||||
8.30 |
Client mobility exemption -- firms |
Are sections 2.2 [Client mobility exemption -- individuals] and 8.30 [Client mobility exemption -- firms] independent of each other? How do the firm and individual limits work together? |
Sections 2.2 [Client mobility exemption -- individuals] and 8.30 [Client mobility exemption -- firms] are independent of each other: individuals may rely on section 2.2 in circumstances where they are not registered in the local jurisdiction even though their firm does not rely on section 8.30 because the firm is registered in the local jurisdiction. |
|||||
The limits are per jurisdiction. For example a firm using the exemption could have 10 clients in each of several local jurisdictions where it is not registered. An individual could also be using the exemption to have 5 clients in each of several jurisdictions where the individual is not registered. |
||||||||
The individual limits are per individual. For example several individuals working for a firm could each have 5 clients in the same local jurisdiction, if their firm was registered in the jurisdiction. Even if a firm is registered in a local jurisdiction and has more than 10 clients served by registered individuals it can have unregistered individuals using the exemption in the jurisdiction. |
||||||||
If a firm is not registered in a jurisdiction, the firm may not exceed its 10 client limit, shared among its representatives. |
||||||||
Can a person or company that is not registered in any jurisdiction in Canada rely on the client mobility exemption? |
No. The client mobility exemption is only available to a person or company that is registered in a jurisdiction of Canada. |
|||||||
PART 11 |
INTERNAL CONTROLS AND SYSTEMS |
|||||||
Division 1 |
Compliance |
|||||||
11.2 |
Designating an ultimate designated person |
When can someone be designated for registration as a firm's ultimate designated person (UDP) on the basis that they are acting in a capacity similar to that of the chief executive officer (CEO) or sole proprietor? |
The primary purpose of paragraph 11.2(2)(c) is to address the situation where a firm does not have a CEO or sole proprietor (for example, because it is organized as a partnership). |
|||||
It is not normally possible to act in a capacity similar to a CEO or sole proprietor when someone else is the actual CEO or sole proprietor. Consequently, designation pursuant to paragraph 11.2(2)(c) is not available when the firm has a CEO or sole proprietor. If a firm has a CEO or sole proprietor, that person must be designated for registration as its UDP, unless another person qualifies under paragraph 11.2(2)(b). |
||||||||
To designate someone else in these circumstances would require an exemptive relief order. Given that the intention of section 11.2 is to ensure responsibility for its compliance system rests at the very top of a firm, we would only anticipate granting relief in rare cases. |
||||||||
If a firm does not have a CEO and is not a sole proprietorship, and no other person qualifies under paragraph 11.2(2)(b), the most senior decision maker in the firm is the individual who would be most likely to be acting in a similar capacity to a CEO or sole proprietor. They might have the title of managing partner or president, for example, and would be the individual we would expect to see designated as UDP under paragraph 11.2(2)(c). |
||||||||
We note that in larger organizations, the UDP is sometimes supported by an officer who has a compliance oversight role and title within the organization that is more senior than the chief compliance officer. This is an acceptable arrangement, so long as it is understood that it in no way diminishes the UDP's regulatory responsibilities. |
||||||||
Division 3 |
Certain business transactions |
|||||||
11.9 |
Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets |
Does the exemption in subsection 11.9(3) extend to the situation of a parent company registrant that proposes to acquire all of the assets of its wholly-owned registered subsidiary and then cause it to be wound up and dissolved? |
A wind-up and dissolution is not an amalgamation, merger, arrangement or treasury issue and does not qualify as a reorganization. The exemption in subsection 11.9(3) would therefore not be available. |
|||||
11.9 |
Registrant acquiring a registered firm's securities or assets |
Are sections 11.9 and 11.10 intended to capture minor purchases by individual registrants of securities of their registered employer? |
No. Paragraph 11.9(3)(b) and subsection 11.10(1) both include 10% thresholds that may apply to the purchase of securities of the firm by its registered individuals. |
|||||
11.10 |
Registered firm whose securities are acquired |
|||||||
If the firm is registered in more than one jurisdiction, can the notices required under sections 11.9 and 11.10 be delivered to the principal regulator alone? |
No. If a firm is required to give notice, it must be filed with each regulator -- see subsection 1.3(2). |
|||||||
PART 12 |
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
|||||||
Division 1 |
Working capital |
|||||||
12.1 |
Capital requirements |
If a firm is registered in a category that requires membership in the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC) or the Mutual Fund Dealers Association of Canada (the MFDA), and also in another category that does not require membership in either self-regulatory organization (SRO), will the firm still need to file Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital with the regulator? |
Yes. The exemptions for IIROC and MFDA member firms in section 9.3 do not include an exemption from the requirement to file Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital with the regulator if a firm is also registered in a category that does not require SRO membership. |
|||||
Example: A firm that is registered as an investment fund manager and a mutual fund dealer and is a member of the MFDA. |
||||||||
Division 2 |
Insurance |
|||||||
12.3 |
Insurance -- dealer |
How do I make the calculations required in sections 12.3, 12.4 and 12.5? |
The calculation required in paragraphs 12.3(2)(b) and (c), 12.4(3)(a) and (b) and 12.5(a) and (b) is based on the lesser of 1% of assets or $25 million (and not 1% of $25 million). |
|||||
12.4 |
Insurance -- adviser |
|||||||
12.5 |
Insurance -- investment fund manager |
The word "and" following "Appendix A" in subsections 12.3(2), 12.4(2) and (3), and 12.5(2) should be ignored. We will remove it in amendments in order to clarify the meaning of these provisions. |
||||||
What is the timing of the calculation of insurance requirements -- when must a firm adjust its insurance? |
The insurance provisions say that the registered firm must "maintain" bonding or insurance in the amounts specified. We do not expect that the calculation would differ materially from day-to-day. If there is a material change in a firm's circumstances, it should consider the potential impact on its ability to meet its insurance requirements. |
|||||||
What are the "assets under management" that must be included in the insurance calculations of a firm registered in the categories of portfolio manager (PM) and investment fund manager (IFM)? |
Insurance requirements are not cumulative. So, for a firm registered in the categories of PM and IFM, insurance coverage must be in the higher amount of the calculations with respect to its IFM or PM registration. |
|||||||
Despite being registered as both a PM and an IFM, when calculating the IFM insurance requirement under subsection 12.5(2), an IFM should only include the total assets under management of its own investment funds. It is only with respect to its own funds that the registrant is acting as an IFM. |
||||||||
To calculate the PM insurance requirement look to section 12.4. The required level of insurance will depend on whether the PM holds or has access to client assets. See section 12.4 of the Companion Policy for what we consider to be holding or having access to client assets. |
||||||||
Division 4 |
Financial reporting |
How will accounting terms in NI 31-103 work with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Amendments? |
Proposed amendments to NI 31-103 necessary to accommodate IFRS were published for comment on October 23, 2009, except in Québec and New Brunswick where the proposed amendments will be published in early 2010. The comment period will end on January 21, 2010. |
|||||
12.12 |
Delivering financial information -- dealer |
Is there a transition provision applicable to the requirement to deliver Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital? |
There is no transition provision applicable to the requirement to use Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital. Registered firms are required to deliver Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital. However, we recognize that there may be some discrepancies where firms rely on the transitional relief from section 12.1 [Capital requirements] that is provided under section 16.11 for firms that continue to comply with former non-harmonized capital requirements. If a firm relies on section 16.11 it must also deliver the capital calculations required under former requirements, if any. |
|||||
12.13 |
Delivering financial information -- adviser |
|||||||
12.14 |
Delivering financial information -- investment fund manager |
|||||||
In Ontario, we do not expect a firm that calculates its working capital based on consolidated financial statements in reliance on the transitional relief in section 16.11 to deliver a Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital. |
||||||||
If a firm has multiple registrations, is it required to deliver multiple capital calculations using Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital? |
No. If a firm has multiple registrations, it only needs to file only one Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital to the regulators, but must include all required information. For example, |
|||||||
• |
if the firm is a portfolio manager (PM) and investment fund manager (IFM), it will need to file Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital quarterly and report any net asset value (NAV) adjustments quarterly (to comply with IFM requirements, notwithstanding that a PM has no such requirements) |
|||||||
• |
if the firm is a mutual fund dealer registered in Québec which is also registered as an exempt market dealer in Québec, it will need to file Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital quarterly as well as the bi-monthly net free capital calculation as set out in Appendix I of the Regulation respecting the trust accounts and financial resources of securities firms. |
|||||||
A firm that is a member of a self-regulatory organization (SRO) may also have capital calculation delivery requirements under the SRO's rules. |
||||||||
12.12 |
Delivering financial information -- dealer |
Is there a transition period for former limited market dealers in respect of the requirements to deliver audited annual financial statements and Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital? |
Yes. For former limited market dealers in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador "mapped-over" to exempt market dealers (EMDs) under section 16.3, a transitional relief order was issued on September 28, 2009, exempting them from the requirements in subsection 12.12(1) to deliver audited annual financial statements and prescribed capital calculations for a period of one year, consistent with the other solvency-related transitional relief provided in section 16.3. The relief is only available to the extent a mapped-over EMD is not registered in another category that requires delivery of financial statements or client statements during the applicable transition period. |
|||||
PART 13 |
DEALING WITH CLIENTS -- INDIVIDUALS AND FIRMS |
|||||||
Division 1 |
Know your client and suitability |
|||||||
13.3 |
Suitability |
Has the CSA published any additional guidance on section 13.3? |
Yes. CSA Staff Notice 33-315 Suitability Obligation and Know Your Product was published on September 2, 2009. |
|||||
Division 2 |
Conflicts of interest |
Are registrants still required to provide a specified statement of policies disclosure as was previously required in some jurisdictions (e.g. in Ontario, section 223 of the Regulations)? |
No. There is no prescribed form of disclosure required in the conflicts of interest provisions of NI 31-103. The Companion Policy provides additional guidance in regards to disclosure about relationships with related or connected issuers. |
|||||
Division 3 |
Referral Arrangements |
|||||||
13.7 |
Definitions -- referral arrangements |
Does "referral fee" include non-monetary compensation? |
Yes. "Referral fee" is defined in section 13.7 as any form of compensation. For example, gift certificates would be included. |
|||||
PART 14 |
HANDLING CLIENT ACCOUNTS -- FIRMS |
|||||||
Division 2 |
Disclosure to clients |
|||||||
14.2 |
Relationship disclosure information |
Does section 14.2 apply to clients who opened accounts before NI 31-103 came into effect? |
Yes. Section 14.2 applies to all clients, including those clients who opened accounts prior to September 28, 2009. Section 16.14 provides a one-year transition period from the requirements in section 14.2. |
|||||
14.4 |
When the firm has a relationship with a financial institution |
Does section 14.4 apply to accounts opened before NI 31-103 came into effect? |
No. Section 14.4 applies only to new accounts opened after September 28, 2009. |
|||||
14.5 |
Notice to clients by non-resident registrants |
Does the non-resident notice provision in section 14.5 apply to a Canadian registrant whose head office is located in another Canadian jurisdiction? |
Yes. However, it was not our intention to include registrants based in Canada if they have a physical place of business in the jurisdiction. |
|||||
We anticipate issuing an order that provides relief from section 14.5 for registered firms that have their head office in a Canadian jurisdiction and a physical place of business in the local jurisdiction. |
||||||||
Division 3 |
Client Assets |
|||||||
14.6 |
Holding client assets in trust |
Is there an exemption for a Canadian manager of an offshore fund that may have difficulty satisfying the requirement of paragraph 14.6(c) that cash be held effectively in Canada? |
No. NI 31-103 does not provide an exemption from the requirement in paragraph 14.6(c). However, we recognize that it may be difficult to comply in the circumstances described. We will consider granting discretionary relief on terms consistent with section 14.7. |
|||||
Division 5 |
Account activity reporting |
|||||||
14.12 |
Content and delivery of trade confirmation |
Must all of the information required in subsection 14.12(1) be provided to the client in a single document? |
There is no prescribed confirmation document that must be delivered to the client separately from any other documentation related to the transaction. The requirement for a written confirmation of a transaction can be satisfied by promptly delivering to the client a subscription agreement or other document or combination of documents which, taken together, provide all of the information listed in subsection 14.12(1). |
|||||
14.12 |
Content and delivery of trade confirmation |
Can confirmations and client statements be delivered electronically? |
Yes. Confirmations and client statements can be delivered electronically (i.e., internet, fax or other "written" form) if the client agrees. See NP 11-201 Delivery of Documents by Electronic Means. |
|||||
14.13 |
Semi-annual confirmations for certain automatic plans |
|||||||
14.14 |
Client statements |
|||||||
14.14 |
Client statements |
Must a registrant provide a monthly statement if there is no activity in the account? |
Only if the firm is a registered dealer and a client has asked for monthly statements, unless the registrant is a mutual fund dealer. Otherwise, statements may be sent on a quarterly basis, except in the case of scholarship plan dealers, who must provide an annual statement. |
|||||
If my firm was not subject to client statement requirements before NI 31-103 came into force, do I have to send out client statements that include transactions that took place before then? |
No. If a firm was not subject to client statement requirements before NI 31-103 came into force, only transactions that took place after that date are required to be included in the firm's first monthly or quarterly client statements. |
|||||||
How should "market value" for the purposes of subsection 14.14(5) be determined? |
Where possible, market value should be determined by reference to a quoted value on a recognized exchange or marketplace. If market value is not quoted on an exchange (e.g. bonds) market value may be determined by reference to quotes that are available through brokers. We recognize that it is not always possible to obtain a market value by these methods. In such cases, we will accept a valuation policy that is consistently applied and is based on measures considered reasonable in the industry, such as value at cost where there has been no material subsequent event (e.g. a market event or new capital raising by the issuer). |
|||||||
Does a former limited market dealer "mapped-over" to exempt market dealer (EMD) under section 16.3 have transitional relief from the requirement to deliver client statements? |
Yes. For former limited market dealers in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador "mapped-over" to EMDs under section 16.3, a transitional relief order was issued on September 28, 2009, exempting them from the requirements in section 14.14 to deliver client statements for a period of two years, consistent with the transitional relief provided for mutual fund dealers (MFDs) in section 16.17. The relief is not available to a mapped-over EMD that is also registered in a category other than MFD or investment fund manager (IFM). |
|||||||
PART 16 |
TRANSITION |
|||||||
Are the transition periods flexible? |
We will always consider applications for exemptive relief. However, we anticipate granting extensions of the transition periods only in rare circumstances. |
|||||||
What if a registrant does not meet an applicable requirement under NI 31-103 before the end of the applicable transition period? |
The registrant should immediately contact the regulator. A registrant in that situation might be required to cease to conduct registerable activities until they comply with the requirement, or a temporary exemption might be granted subject to terms and conditions, depending on the circumstances. |
|||||||
16.3 |
Change of registration categories -- limited market dealers |
What is the passport procedure for registration of a former limited market dealer that has been "mapped-over" to exempt market dealer (EMD) in Ontario or Newfoundland and Labrador, but has its principal regulator (PR) in another jurisdiction? |
The mapped-over EMD should file a complete Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration with its PR. The application should be filed before the expiry of the transition period in section 16.7. |
|||||
16.7 |
Registration of exempt market dealers |
|||||||
Given the different transition periods in section 8.5 of NI 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions (expiry of registration exemptions on March 27, 2010) and section 16.7 of NI 31-103, when must a person or company register as an exempt market dealer (EMD) if it is in the business of trading in exempt market securities and unable to rely on the "alternative approach to regulating certain intermediaries in the exempt market" described in Appendix D to the CSA Notice of NI 31-103 (published on July 17, 2009)? |
If the person or company was in the business of trading in exempt market securities in a jurisdiction when NI 31-103 came into effect, they may rely on the transition period in section 16.7 of NI 31-103 in that jurisdiction. They must apply for registration by September 28, 2010. |
|||||||
If the person or company did not start operating in the exempt market until after September 28, 2009, they must register by March 28, 2010, which is when the registration exemptions in NI 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions expire. The person or company should apply for registration well in advance of March 28, 2010 to ensure that registration is granted by that date. |
||||||||
When will the jurisdictions that are participating in the "alternative approach to regulating certain intermediaries in the exempt market" described in Appendix D to the CSA Notice of NI 31-103 (published on July 17, 2009) issue their exemptions from exempt market dealer (EMD) registration? |
The jurisdictions that have agreed to this alternative approach will issue local blanket orders to exempt certain intermediaries from EMD registration shortly before the registration exemptions in NI 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions expire (March 27, 2010). |
|||||||
16.11 |
Capital requirements |
If a firm was already registered when NI 31-103 was implemented, will it lose the benefit of the transitional exemptions set out in Part 16 if it adds registration in another category? |
No. A firm would not lose the benefit of the transitional exemptions provided in Part 16 for firms that are registered on the day NI 31-103 came into force (sections 16.8 [Registration of ultimate designated persons], 16.9 [Registration of chief compliance officers], 16.11 [Capital requirements] and 16.13 [Insurance requirements]) if it adds another registration category to what it had on the day when NI 31-103 came into force. |
|||||
16.13 |
Insurance requirements |
|||||||
Note also that subsection 16.4(3) provides a one-year transitional exemption from the investment fund manager (IFM) insurance requirement for a registered dealer or adviser that was acting as an IFM when NI 31-103 came into force. |
||||||||
FORMS |
||||||||
FORM 31-103F1 CALCULATION OF EXCESS WORKING CAPITAL |
How is "market value" determined? |
Where possible, market value is determined by reference to a quoted value on a recognized exchange or marketplace. If market value is not quoted on an exchange (e.g. bonds) market value may be determined by reference to quotes that are available through brokers. We recognize that it is not always possible to obtain a market value by these methods. In such cases, we will accept a valuation policy that is consistently applied and is based on measures considered reasonable in the industry, such as value at cost where there has been no material subsequent event (e.g. a market event or new capital raising by the issuer). |
||||||
What margin rate applies to securities (other than bonds and debentures) listed on exchanges in Canada or the United States? |
The Canadian and United States exchanges listed in clause (e)(ii) of Schedule 1 (50% margin) should not have been included there. Clause (e)(i) sets out the appropriate rates. |
|||||||
Who should sign the management certification at the end of Form 31-103F1 Calculation of Excess Working Capital? |
The most senior decision maker at the firm, who will typically have a title such as chief executive officer, president or managing partner, should be one of the signatories. The firm's chief financial officer or functional equivalent, if there is one, should also sign. If your firm has only one officer, then only one signature is necessary. |
|||||||
FORM 31-103F2 SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION AND APPOINTMENT OF AGENT FOR SERVICE |
If I am relying on the international adviser or international dealer exemptions in sections 8.18 and 8.26, respectively, how can I ensure my firm receives communications from the regulator in a timely manner? |
When submitting your firm's Form 31-103F2 Submission to Jurisdiction and Appointment of Agent for Service, include the name of the chief compliance officer or equivalent, their email address, and their telephone and fax numbers, as well as the firm's National Registration Database number, if it has one. |
||||||
NI 33-109 Registration Information
NI 33-109 |
QUESTION |
ANSWER |
|||||
SECTION |
|||||||
2.3 |
Reinstatement |
How can a permitted individual be reinstated on the National Registration Database (NRD) if their position at the new sponsoring firm is not identical to their position at the old sponsoring firm? |
For permitted individuals, NRD will not allow the individual to be reinstated with a sponsoring firm unless the position at the new sponsoring firm is identical to the position at the old sponsoring firm. So, if, for example, an officer wished to transfer to another sponsoring firm as an officer and director, the sponsoring firm would have to use one of two options: |
||||
1. |
Make a reactivation submission using Form 33-109F4Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals; or |
||||||
2. |
Submit Form 33-109F7 Reinstatement of Registered Individuals and Permitted Individuals to reinstate the individual for the officer position and Form 33-109F2 Change or Surrender of Individual Categories to add the director position. |
||||||
6.1 |
All registered firms to file Form 33-109F6 - September 30, 2010 |
What supporting documents must registered firms submit with their Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration within one year of implementation to their principal regulator (PR)? Must audited financial statements as per question 5.13 be included? |
If submitting Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration pursuant to this section, do not check off any of the boxes for question 1.3 as the reason for submitting the form. Simply make a note in your cover letter or email that you are submitting the form further to section 6.1 of NI 33-109. No supporting documents or audited financial statements are required. |
||||
FORM 33-109F4 REGISTRATION OF INDIVIDUALS AND REVIEW OF PERMITTED INDIVIDUALS |
Is there a requirement for individuals to update their Form 33-109F4 Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals, since there are updated questions in the form? |
An individual is only required to update the questions in items 12 to 17 if there is a change to the response previously provided. |
|||||
Do permitted individuals of investment fund managers (IFM) need to submit Form 33-109F4 Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals? |
Although individuals acting on behalf of a registered IFM are not required to register pursuant to section 2.3 of NI 31-103, permitted individuals of an IFM must nonetheless file Form 33-109F4Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals. |
||||||
"Permitted individual" is defined in section 1.1 of National Instrument 33-109 Registration Information. |
|||||||
When completing Schedule C of Form 33-109F4 Registration of Individuals and Review of Permitted Individuals, must a chief compliance officer (CCO) check off the "Officer -- specify title" box, or only the CCO box? |
If an individual's only officer title is CCO, then only the CCO box should be checked-off. However, if they also have an officer title that is listed in the definition of "permitted individual" in section 1.1 of NI 33-109 (CEO, CFO, COO or functional equivalent), then they should also check the "Officer" box and specify their title. |
||||||
In Québec, when should an authorized firm representative (AFR) submit a professional liability insurance policy and payment of fees payable to the Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF)? |
When an individual is seeking registration in Québec as a dealing representative of a mutual fund dealer or of a scholarship plan dealer who is not already registered in one of these categories. |
||||||
FORM 33-109F6 FIRM REGISTRATION |
If I am a new applicant filing a Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration (not a current registrant updating my information), when do I submit payment? |
After Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration is received, we will contact you and provide you with a submission number in order that you are able to make payment through the National Registration Database. |
|||||
What supporting documents must registered firms submit with their Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration if registering in an additional jurisdiction or adding a registration category, such as investment fund manager (IFM)? Must audited financial statements as per question 5.13 be included? |
Item 1.3 specifies the questions that must be responded to if adding a jurisdiction or category. As question 5.13 is not specified, audited financial statements are not required. |
||||||
However, we will require exempt market dealers (EMDs) registering for the first time (i.e., not already registered in another category in any jurisdiction) and former limited market dealers "mapped-over" to EMD in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador under section 16.3 of NI 31-103 to provide audited financial statements, since we will not already have them. |
|||||||
If my firm has audited annual financial statements prepared for its most recent year end, but those audited statements are more than 90 days old as of the date of our application for registration, must we have new audited financial statements prepared? |
In appropriate cases, where an applicant files audited annual financial statements prepared for its most recent year end, but those audited statements are more than 90 days old, we will accept unaudited financial statements for the period from the financial year end to the month end prior to application. |
||||||
Since these filings would be made as part of the initial application process, as attachments to the Form 33-109F6 Firm Registration, you may request the exemption at that time. No separate exemptive relief application need be filed in respect of this exercise of the Director's discretion. |
|||||||
Must a firm that has its head office outside of Canada be registered in the foreign jurisdiction where it is based? |
Foreign firms applying for registration are normally expected to be registered in a relevant category in their home jurisdiction. This is part of the fit and proper assessment to be registered in Canadian jurisdictions and is also relevant to our compliance oversight capabilities. |
||||||
FORM 33-109F7 REINSTATEMENT OF REGISTERED INDIVIDUALS AND PERMITTED INDIVIDUALS |
My firm recently hired an individual that had terms and conditions imposed on his/her registration. What does this mean for our firm? |
By signing Form 33-109F7 Reinstatement of Registered Individuals and Permitted Individuals, the authorized partner or officer of the new sponsoring firm certifies that the individual's terms and conditions remain in effect and agrees to assume any ongoing obligations that apply to the sponsoring firm in respect of the individual. |
|||||
Registration-related fees
QUESTION |
ANSWER |
||
Where can I get information on the fees payable to the regulators in different jurisdictions? |
There is a link to each of the CSA jurisdiction's fee schedules on the National Registration Database information website at www.nrd-info.ca. The schedules are located under the left-hand navigation bar labelled "Regulatory fees". |
||
CSA Staff Notice 62-305 -- Varying the Terms of Take-Over Bids
CANADIAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS' STAFF NOTICE 62-305
VARYING THE TERMS OF TAKE-OVER BIDS
As used in this notice, the term "Bid Regime" has the meaning ascribed to it in National Policy 62-203 Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids.
The Bid Regime is designed to protect the bona fide interests of offeree security holders while establishing a transparent, even-handed and predictable framework for the conduct of formal bids. An important underpinning of the Bid Regime is that offerors make offers that they are prepared to honour. Upon commencement of a formal take-over bid, the market price of the securities of the offeree issuer may be affected. This creates a legitimate expectation among security holders, other potential offerors, the offeree issuer and other market participants that the bid will be completed at the specified price provided that the conditions of the bid are satisfied.
This notice sets out the view of the staff of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA staff) regarding the ability of an offeror in a formal take-over bid to vary the terms of a bid in a manner that makes the bid less favourable to offeree security holders (a "negative variation"). Variations of this nature may include cases where the offeror:
(a) lowers the consideration offered under the bid,
(b) changes the form of consideration offered, other than to add to the consideration already offered,
(c) lowers the proportion of outstanding securities subject to the bid, or
(d) adds new conditions.
CSA staff are concerned that some market participants have expressed the view that an offeror is entitled, at its discretion and at any time, to withdraw a bid or to vary a bid by reducing the offer price or otherwise making the bid less favourable to offeree security holders.
Does an offeror have the right to reduce its offer price or add new offer conditions for any reason, and at any time, prior to expiry of the bid?
The Bid Regime provides that the bid shall remain open for acceptance for at least 35 days and that securities are to be taken up and paid for under the bid, at the bid price, if the conditions of the bid have been satisfied or waived. The Bid Regime requires that an offeror have the funds in place to pay the consideration offered.
Accordingly, in the view of CSA staff, the Bid Regime does not contemplate the unilateral "withdrawal" of a formal take-over bid, or if all terms and conditions of a bid have been satisfied or waived, the offeror varying the offer price downwards or introducing new conditions.
CSA staff have noted that offer documents and bid circulars occasionally contain language to the effect that the offeror may vary the bid at any time in its sole discretion, including by reducing the consideration offered. CSA staff are of the view that such language may be inconsistent with the requirements of the Bid Regime.
Does an offeror have the right to reduce its offer price or add new conditions where all of the conditions of the offer have not yet been satisfied, or in response to the failure of a condition?
Where the terms and conditions of an offer have not been satisfied, an offeror is entitled to allow its bid to expire and not take up and pay for securities deposited under the bid. The offeror is then entitled to make a new offer on different terms. Where the terms and conditions of an offer have not been satisfied by the expiry of the bid or clearly will not be satisfied during the offer period, staff will not object to an offeror varying its bid by adding new conditions or reducing the consideration offered, provided such variation is not prejudicial to security holders.
National Policy 62-203 Take-Over Bids and Issuer Bids provides that negative variations are subject to review to ensure such variations are not prejudicial to security holders. In determining whether to challenge a negative variation, CSA staff will consider whether such a variation: (a) is in response to the failure of a bona fide condition of the offer; (b) is effected as an alternative to allowing the bid to expire unsuccessfully; (c) provides sufficient procedural protections to offeree security holders and other market participants affected by the variation; and (d) would not be abusive to offeree security holders.
In reviewing such a variation, CSA staff may request submissions and confirmation from the offeror as to the circumstances justifying the position that a bona fide condition of the offer has not been or will not be satisfied. This includes whether the offeror has informed the market in a timely manner as to such failure of a condition and the events giving rise to the failure, and the reasonableness of the procedural protections being put in place for the benefit of the offeree security holders and other affected market participants. The notice of variation to be filed by the offeror should disclose this information.
Where the onus is being placed on security holders to take active steps to withdraw securities tendered to an offer following a variation of that offer, there is a risk that some security holders may not become aware of the variation and would not have tendered on the varied terms. An offeror should consider and address this risk in deciding whether to vary a bid rather than to commence a new bid and in implementing the procedural protections to be provided to offeree security holders in the event it elects to proceed with a negative variation. The procedural protections, including period of extension, should also provide the offeree board of directors with sufficient time to assess the revised offer and communicate its views to its security holders. The time period must also provide sufficient time for other potential offerors to evaluate the revised offer and determine whether to participate in an auction for the offeree issuer.
In CSA staff's view, the offeror's conditions to a formal take-over bid should be bona fide, and should be interpreted in good faith and on a reasonable basis. If they are not, staff may take the position that reliance on a condition undermines the statutory requirement that shares be taken up under an offer where the terms and conditions have been satisfied. Where the failure of a condition is being relied upon to vary a bid or where a condition is expressed such that the offeror has sole judgment or discretion as to whether the condition has been satisfied, staff may intervene where necessary to ensure that such judgment or discretion is exercised in a reasonable manner. This is irrespective of whether it is stated in the bid circular that the offeror has sole discretion as to whether conditions are satisfied. In CSA staff's view, an offeror reserving "sole discretion" with respect to a condition should act honestly, in good faith and on reasonable grounds such that the exercise of such discretion is not capricious or arbitrary.
A negative variation should not be used to avoid the obligation on the offeror to have funds available to pay the consideration offered under a bid. For example, it would be a contravention of the Bid Regime to commence a bid at a specific price, but arrange financing at a lower price with the intention that the bid price will ultimately be reduced. In examining negative variations, staff may request documentation evidencing that funds were available to pay the initially offered consideration at the time the offer was made.
Questions
Questions may be referred to:
December 18, 2009
Notice of Ministerial Approval of Memorandum of Understanding Respecting the Oversight of Exchanges and Quotation and Trade Reporting Systems and Commission Approval of List of Exchanges
NOTICE OF MINISTERIAL APPROVAL
OF
AN AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING RESPECTING
THE OVERSIGHT OF EXCHANGES AND QUOTATION AND TRADE REPORTING SYSTEMS
AND COMMISSION APPROVAL OF THE LIST OF EXCHANGES
On November 27, 2009, the Minister of Finance approved the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) among certain members of the Canadian Securities Administrators about the oversight of exchanges and quotation and trade reporting systems (QTRSs). The MOU amends an existing MOU, which came into effect in Ontario in November 2002. The MOU was previously published on October 2, 2009 at (2009) 32 OSCB 7764 and will become effective on January 1, 2010.
The MOU references a list of the lead and exempting regulators for each exchange or QTRS (List of Exchanges). As indicated on the List of Exchanges, there is currently no exempting regulator for ICE Futures Canada Inc. However, this is a temporary situation since this exchange has filed for an exemption from the requirement to be recognized as an exchange in some jurisdictions. The List of Exchanges dated as of January 1, 2010 has been approved by the Commission. The final MOU and List of Exchanges are published in this Bulletin.
December 18, 2009
Memorandum of Understanding
respecting the Oversight of Exchanges and Quotation and Trade Reporting Systems
among:
Alberta Securities Commission (ASC)
Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF)
British Columbia Securities Commission (BCSC)
Manitoba Securities Commission (MSC)
Ontario Securities Commission (OSC)
Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission (SFSC)
(each a Party, collectively the Parties)
The Parties agree as follows:
1. Underlying Principles
(a) Lead Regulator Model
(i) Each recognized exchange (Exchange) and recognized quotation and trade reporting system (QTRS) subject to this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has a lead regulator (Lead Regulator) responsible for its oversight and one or more exempting regulators (Exempting Regulator).
(ii) The Exempting Regulator of an Exchange or QTRS exempts it from recognition as an Exchange or QTRS on the basis that:
(A) the Exchange or QTRS is and will continue to be recognized by the Lead Regulator as an Exchange or QTRS;
(B) the Lead Regulator is responsible for conducting the regulatory oversight of the Exchange or QTRS; and
(C) the Lead Regulator will inform the Exempting Regulator of its oversight activities and the Exempting Regulator will have the opportunity to raise issues concerning the oversight of the Exchange or QTRS with the Lead Regulator in accordance with this MOU.
(iii) The Lead Regulator is responsible for conducting an oversight program (the Oversight Program) of the Exchange or QTRS that will include the purpose and matters described in section 3.
(iv) The Parties will act in good faith to resolve issues raised by any Exempting Regulator in connection with the Oversight Program carried out by the Lead Regulator.
(b) Scope
The terms of this MOU are applied by the Parties in respect of the oversight of an Exchange or QTRS identified on a list entitled "List of Exchanges, Lead Regulators and Exempting Regulators in relation to the Memorandum of Understanding respecting the Oversight of Exchanges and Quotation and Trade Reporting Systems" ("List of Exchanges"), published concurrently with this MOU by each Party. The List of Exchanges does not form part of this MOU. It may be amended from time to time and will be published by each Party after any such amendment.
(c) Previous Memorandum of Understanding
This MOU supersedes any prior Memorandum of Understanding about the Oversight of Exchanges and Quotation and Trade Reporting Systems among the ASC, Commission des valeurs mobilières du Québec, now the AMF, BCSC, MSC and OSC.
2. Definition
"Lead Regulator" means the Party that is designated on the List of Exchanges from time to time as being the Lead Regulator responsible for the oversight of a particular Exchange or QTRS by consensus of the Parties that have either recognized or exempted from recognition this Exchange or QTRS or are in the process of doing so.
3. Oversight Program
(a) The purpose of the Oversight Program{1} is to ensure that each Exchange and QTRS meets appropriate standards for market operation and regulation based on the type of activities carried out by the Exchange or QTRS. Where applicable, those standards will include:
(i) fair representation in corporate governance and rule-making;
(ii) effective management of conflicts of interests;
(iii) adequate ownership/control structure;
(iv) financial viability;
(v) sufficient resources to carry out market and regulatory functions;
(vi) fair access for market participants and issuers;
(vii) orderly markets through appropriate review of traded products, trading rules and financial requirements for market participants;
(viii) transparency through timely access to accurate information on orders and trades;
(ix) market integrity through the adoption of rules that are not contrary to the public interest, prohibit unfair trading practices, prevent market manipulation and customer and market abuses and promote just and equitable principles of trades;
(x) monitoring of the conduct of the market participants and enforcement of the rules and requirements governing such conduct;
(xi) proper identification and management of risks;
(xii) effective clearing and settlement arrangements and systems;
(xiii) information sharing and regulatory cooperation;
(xiv) appropriate listed or quoted company regulation;
(xv) adequate financial products and instruments development process;
(xvi) specific trading and position limits;
(xvii) appropriate inventory and stock delivery management procedures; and
(xviii) appropriate coordination regarding the market surveillance of the underlying securities.
(b) The Lead Regulator will establish and conduct the Oversight Program.{1} At a minimum, the Oversight Program will include the following:
(i) Review of information filed by the Exchange or QTRS on critical financial and operational matters, risk management and significant changes to operations, including information filed under National Instrument 21-101 - Marketplace Operation, related to:
(A) corporate governance;
(B) rules;
(C) systems and operations;
(D) access;
(E) listing criteria and/ or financial instrument development;
(F) fees;
(G) financial viability; and
(H) regulation.
(ii) Review and approval, where applicable, of changes to Exchange or QTRS bylaws, rules, policies, and other similar instruments (Rules) under the procedures established by the Lead Regulator from time to time.
(iii) Periodic oversight review of Exchange or QTRS functions, including to the extent applicable:
(A) corporate finance policies: policies relating to minimum listing or quoting requirements, continuing listing or quoting requirements or tier maintenance requirements, sponsorship and continuous disclosure;
(B) trading halts, suspensions and de-listing procedures;
(C) co-ordination with the markets of the underlying securities;
(D) monitoring of trading and position limits;
(E) surveillance and enforcement: procedures for detection of non-compliance and resolution of outstanding issues;
(F) access: requirements for access to the facilities of the Exchange or QTRS and fair application of those requirements;
(G) information transparency: procedures for the dissemination of market information;
(H) corporate governance: corporate governance procedures, including policy and rule making process;
(I) risk management; and
(J) systems and technology.
(c) The Lead Regulator will retain sole discretion regarding the manner in which the Oversight Program is carried out, including determining the order and timing of its oversight review of the functions under section 3(b)(iii). However, the Lead Regulator will perform the oversight reviews of these functions at least once every three years. Once it has obtained the necessary internal approval and when the final report of the oversight review performed under section 3(b)(iii) is sent to the Exchange or QTRS, the Lead Regulator will also provide a copy of the final report and any responses of the Exchange or QTRS to the report to each Exempting Regulator.
(d) If issuers or parties that are directly affected by a decision of the Exchange or QTRS in the jurisdiction of an Exempting Regulator appeal that decision to the Lead Regulator or request a hearing and review of that decision by the Lead Regulator, the Lead Regulator will provide videoconferencing facilities or other electronic equipment as necessary and appropriate to permit and facilitate the participation of the parties in the proceedings in the jurisdiction of the Exempting Regulator. The Lead Regulator will also provide simultaneous translation facilities or other facilities necessary and appropriate to permit the participation of the parties in the proceedings in French or English, at their request.
(e) The Lead Regulator will inform each Exempting Regulator in writing of any material changes in how it performs its obligations under this MOU.
4. Involvement of an Exempting Regulator
(a) The Lead Regulator acknowledges that an Exempting Regulator may require that the Exchange or QTRS provide to that Exempting Regulator:
(i) copies of information filed by the Exchange or QTRS pursuant to section 3(b)(i) at the same time that the Exchange or QTRS files the information with the Lead Regulator; and
(ii) copies of all Rules that the Exchange or QTRS files with the Lead Regulator under the Lead Regulator's procedures referred to in section 3(b)(ii) at the same time that the Exchange or QTRS files the Rules with the Lead Regulator,
(iii) copies of all final Rules once approved by the Lead Regulator under the Lead Regulator's procedures referred to in section 3(b)(ii);
(iv) in the specific context of an investigation by an Exempting Regulator and upon a specific request from that Exempting Regulator, information in writing about the marketplace participants, the shareholders or the market operations of the Exchange or QTRS.
(b) If an Exempting Regulator advises the Lead Regulator that it has specific concerns regarding the operations of the Exchange or QTRS in the jurisdiction of the Exempting Regulator and requests that the Lead Regulator perform an oversight review of the Exchange or QTRS in that jurisdiction, the Lead Regulator may determine to conduct an oversight review of:
(i) the office of the Exchange or QTRS in the jurisdiction of the Exempting Regulator; or
(ii) a function performed by an Exchange or QTRS office in that jurisdiction.
The Exempting Regulator may, as part of its request, ask that the Lead Regulator include staff of the Exempting Regulator in the Lead Regulator's oversight review. The Lead Regulator may, as a condition of performing the oversight review, request the assistance of staff of the Exempting Regulator in which case the Exempting Regulator will use its best efforts to provide this assistance.
(c) If the Lead Regulator advises the Exempting Regulator that it cannot or will not conduct the oversight review referred to in section 4(b), the Exempting Regulator may conduct the oversight review without the participation of the Lead Regulator. In that case, the Exempting Regulator will provide copies of the results of the oversight review to the Lead Regulator at the same time it sends the results to the Exchange or QTRS.
5. Information Sharing
(a) The Lead Regulator will, upon written request from an Exempting Regulator, provide or request the Exchange or QTRS to provide to the Exempting Regulator any information about the marketplace participants, the shareholders and the market operations of the Exchange or QTRS. This would include shareholder and participating organization lists, product and trading information and disciplinary decisions.
(b) In addition, to the extent practicable and as appropriate in the particular circumstances, the Lead Regulator will inform the Exempting Regulators in advance of any material events, or material decisions taken either by the Lead Regulator or the Exchange or QTRS, that may have a significant impact on the operations or activities of the Exchange or QTRS
6. Oversight Committee
(a) An oversight committee will continue to have the mandate to act as a forum and venue for the discussion of issues, concerns and proposals related to the oversight of marketplaces by the Parties (Oversight Committee).
(b) The Oversight Committee will include staff representatives from each of the Parties who have responsibility and/or expertise in the areas of marketplace oversight and market regulation.
(c) The Oversight Committee will meet at least once annually in person and will conduct conference calls at least quarterly.
(d) At least quarterly, the Parties will provide to the Oversight Committee a summary report on their oversight activities conducted during the period that will include a summary description of any material changes made to their oversight program, including the procedures for the review and approval of Exchange or QTRS Rules.
(d) At least annually, the Oversight Committee will provide to the Canadian Securities Administrators a written report of the oversight activities of the committee members during the previous period.
7. Issues Forum
(a) The Parties acknowledge that:
(i) more than one Exchange or QTRS may file the same Rules to different Lead Regulators for review and approval at the same time;
(ii) one Exchange or QTRS may file a Rule to its Lead Regulator for review and approval that is the same as an existing Rule adopted by a different Exchange or QTRS with a different Lead Regulator; or
(iii) an Exempting Regulator may have material concerns regarding a Rule that the Exchange or QTRS has filed for review and approval with the Lead Regulator under the Lead Regulator's procedures referred to in section 3(b)(ii).
(b) In the event the circumstances set out in section 7(a) arise, the Lead Regulators will act in good faith to resolve the issues or concerns raised by any of the parties involved in a dispute or disagreement in order to either achieve consistent results among the Lead Regulators or to address the concerns of the Exempting Regulator.
(c) The Parties to this MOU will establish a committee of the Chairs or other senior executives of the parties involved (the "Issues Forum") that will attempt to reach a consensus between the parties on any issue in dispute or disagreement under section 7(a). The Issues Forum will make recommendations to the various parties. Staff of any of the parties involved in a dispute or disagreement may submit the issue in dispute or the matter causing the disagreement to the Issues Forum.
(d) The Issues Forum will include the Chair or another senior executive of each Party involved in a dispute or disagreement under 7(a). For purposes of this section and if there are joint Lead Regulators of an Exchange or QTRS, the joint Lead Regulators of the Exchange or QTRS will be considered to be separate parties.
8. Waiver and Termination
(a) The provisions of this MOU may be waived by mutual agreement of the Parties.
(b) If the Lead Regulator or an Exempting Regulator of an Exchange or QTRS believes that another Party is not satisfactorily performing its obligations under this MOU, it may give written notice to the other Party stating that belief and providing particulars in reasonable detail of the alleged failure to perform. If the Party receiving the notice has not satisfied the notifying Party within two months of the delivery of the notice either that its performance is satisfactory or that it has taken or will take acceptable steps to rectify its performance, the notifying Party may by written notice to the other Party terminate this MOU as it relates to that Exchange or QTRS on a date not less than six months following delivery of the notice of termination. In that case, the notifying Party will send to the Exchange or QTRS a copy of its notice of termination at the same time it sends the notice to all the other Parties.
(c) In the event any significant change to the ownership, structure or operations of an Exchange or QTRS affects the oversight of the Exchange or QTRS, a Lead Regulator or any Exempting Regulator may give written notice to the other Parties stating its concerns. If a resolution cannot be reached within two months of the delivery of the notice, the notifying Party may by written notice to the other Parties terminate this MOU as it relates to the Exchange or QTRS on a date not less than six months following delivery of the notice of termination. In that case, the notifying Party will send to the Exchange or QTRS a copy of its notice of termination at the same time it sends the notice to all the other Parties.
(d) For purposes of this section and if applicable, the joint Lead Regulators of the Exchange or QTRS will be considered one party.
9. Amendments to and Withdrawal from this MOU
(a) This MOU may be amended from time to time as mutually agreed upon by the Parties. Any amendments must be in writing and approved by the duly authorized representatives of each Party. Any amendment of this MOU is subject to Ministerial approval in Ontario and to Governmental approval in Québec. For clarity, the List of Exchanges does not form part of this MOU.
(b) The Parties acknowledge that the securities regulators of any other jurisdiction where an Exchange or QTRS is recognized or exempted from recognition may become a Party to this MOU.
(c) Each Party can, at any time, withdraw from this MOU on at least 90 days written notice to all other Parties.
10. Effective Date
This MOU comes into effect on January 1, 2010.
List of Exchanges, Lead Regulators and Exempting Regulators
in relation to the
Memorandum of Understanding respecting the
Oversight of Exchanges and Quotation and Trade Reporting Systems
As of January 1, 2010
EXCHANGE - QTRS |
LEAD REGULATOR |
EXEMPTING REGULATOR |
|||
Bourse de Montréal Inc. |
• |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
• |
Ontario Securities Commission |
|
CNSX Markets Inc. |
• |
Ontario Securities Commission |
• |
Alberta Securities Commission |
|
• |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
||||
• |
British Columbia Securities Commission |
||||
• |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
||||
ICE Futures Canada Inc. |
• |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
|||
Natural Gas Exchange Inc. |
• |
Alberta Securities Commission |
• |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
|
• |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
||||
• |
Ontario Securities Commission |
||||
TSX Venture Exchange Inc. |
• |
Alberta Securities Commission |
• |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
|
• |
British Columbia Securities Commission |
• |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
||
• |
Ontario Securities Commission |
||||
TSX Inc. |
• |
Ontario Securities Commission |
• |
Alberta Securities Commission |
|
• |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
||||
• |
British Columbia Securities Commission |
||||
{1} The matters outlined in the Oversight Program are intended to set out the minimum level of oversight exercised in respect of an Exchange or QTRS. The Lead Regulator may conduct additional review procedures.
OSC Notice 51-717 -- Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure
OSC NOTICE 51-717
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE
Purpose of this notice
The purpose of this notice is to communicate the Ontario Securities Commission's (OSC) plans regarding disclosure of corporate governance and environmental matters by reporting issuers (other than investment funds).
Corporate governance disclosure review
During 2010, we will conduct a review of compliance with the requirements of National Instrument 58-101 Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices. The review will build on the results of our 2007 review, described in CSA Staff Notice 58-303 Corporate Governance Disclosure Compliance Review. Our review will involve assessing the adequacy of corporate governance disclosure in information circulars (or annual information forms or annual management's discussion & analysis, if applicable) filed by issuers in spring 2010.
Environmental disclosure guidance
During 2010, we intend to issue a staff notice providing guidance on compliance with existing environmental disclosure requirements under National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations. In developing the notice, we plan to consult with our advisory committees and other experts in this area. We intend to publish the notice by December 2010 so that reporting issuers will have sufficient time to consider the guidance when preparing their 2010 annual continuous disclosure documents.
Background
These actions are the outcome of our corporate sustainability reporting initiative, which was undertaken in response to a broad resolution introduced by MPP Laurel Broten and unanimously approved by the Ontario Legislature on April 9, 2009. The non-binding resolution called on the OSC to undertake a broad consultation to establish best practice corporate social responsibility and environmental, social and governance reporting standards.
Following the approval of the resolution, the Ministry of Finance and the OSC agreed that the OSC would:
• review existing disclosure requirements under Ontario securities legislation for reporting issuers (other than investment funds) regarding corporate governance and environmental matters
• consult with investors, issuers, advisors and other stakeholders on these matters, and
• make recommendations to the Minister of Finance by January 1, 2010 regarding "next steps" to enhance disclosure of these matters, if determined necessary and appropriate.
In developing the mandate, a number of factors were considered, including the areas of concern expressed by investors and other stakeholders, various international developments and the relatively short timeline to complete this initiative. In light of those factors, the OSC and the Ministry of Finance agreed that the OSC should focus on the disclosure of corporate governance and environmental matters at this time. The Hennick Centre for Business and Law at York University (the Hennick Centre) is currently undertaking a review of disclosure requirements for social matters and will report to the Minister of Finance. As part of that initiative, the Hennick Centre and Jantzi-Sustainalytics hosted a roundtable on corporate social reporting on December 7, 2009, to which they invited representatives from government agencies (including the OSC), non-profit organizations and business.
As part of our initiative, we consulted with stakeholders, our Continuous Disclosure Advisory Committee, our Securities Advisory Committee and the Prospectors & Developers Association of Canada. We also held a roundtable discussion on September 18, 2009, to which we invited representatives of investors, issuers and professional bodies, analysts, legal and accounting advisors and academics. A consultation paper was distributed to the roundtable participants to seek their input on the initiative. An updated version of that paper is attached to our report to the Minister of Finance, which is being published concurrently with this notice.
The OSC's plans regarding disclosure of corporate governance and environmental matters as described in this notice and our report to the Minister of Finance reflect the feedback we received on this initiative during the consultation process.
The OSC will invite staff at other Canadian Securities Administrators to participate in the corporate governance compliance review and the development of the guidance for environmental disclosures.
Questions
If you have questions with respect to this initiative, please contact one of the following individuals:
December 18, 2009
Chi-X Canada ATS Limited Notice of Proposed Changes
CHI-X CANADA ATS LIMITED NOTICE OF PROPOSED CHANGES
Chi-X Canada ATS Limited ("Chi-X") has announced its plans to implement the changes described below on February 2, 2010. It is publishing this Notice of Proposed Changes in accordance with the requirements set out in OSC Staff Notice 21-703 (October 9, 2009) 32 OSCB 8007.
Sweep and Cross Order
Description of Proposed Changes and Reasons for Changes
The Sweep and Cross Order is being introduced to facilitate customers trying to execute an intentional cross. This order type will facilitate an intentional cross by displacing any better priced orders on protected markets. Chi-X will route immediate or cancel orders ("IOC's") to all protected markets that contain displayed prices that are better than the customer's limit price. The IOC's will be sent to all markets simultaneously and carry the bypass marker. Once Chi-X has attempted to execute against all better prices on the protected markets, it will send a "cross" order to the Chi-X books.
Impact of the Changes
The automation of a process generally done manually by brokerage firms in Canada will result in efficiencies and less errors when customers are executing a cross.
Consultations
The introduction of this order type is being made in response to several customer requests.
Consideration of Alternatives
No other alternatives were considered.
Existence of Proposed Change in the Market
No other marketplace in Canada currently offers this type of order.
Post Only Order
Description of Proposed Changes and Reasons for Changes
The Post Only Order will replace the Liquidity Provision Order that Chi-X currently offers to customers. Chi-X will offer its subscribers the option of designating an order as liquidity providing only. An order marked as Post Only will post on Chi-X if it will add liquidity otherwise it will be passively re-priced one tick increment and booked. The Post Only order will not interact with hidden liquidity. The change is that if a Post Only Order is immediately executable and therefore would immediately remove liquidity, the order will be re-priced one tick increment rather than being cancelled which is presently the case with the immediately executable Liquidity Provision Order.
Impact of the Changes
This type of order is used by clients trying to avoid the increased costs associated with removing liquidity. Re-pricing the orders rather than rejecting the order is expected to increase the efficiency and usage of this order type.
Consultations
The introduction of this order type is being made in response to several customer requests.
Consideration of Alternatives
No other alternatives were considered.
Existence of Proposed Change in the Market
At present, at least one other marketplace in Canada offers a "Post Only" order type with orders immediately executable being rejected. Only Chi-X Canada ATS Limited offers the capability for this order type being re-priced to avoid just being rejected in the Canadian marketplace.
Notice and Request for Feedback -- Proposed Changes to the Operations of Chi-X Canada ATS Limited
CHI-X CANADA ATS LIMITED
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE OPERATIONS OF CHI-X CANADA ATS LIMITED TO INTRODUCE TWO NEW ORDER
TYPES: THE SWEEP AND CROSS ORDER AND THE POST ONLY ORDER
NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR FEEDBACK
On December 18, 2009, Chi-X Canada ATS Limited published notice of proposed changes to its operations to introduce two new order types: the Sweep and Cross Order and the Post Only Order. A copy of this notice is reproduced at Chapter 1 of this Bulletin.
Pursuant to OSC Staff Notice 21-703 -- Transparency of the Operations of Stock Exchanges and Alternative Trading Systems, Commission Staff invite market participants to provide the Commission with feedback on the proposed changes.
Feedback on the proposed changes should be in writing and submitted by January 18, 2010 to:
Market Regulation Branch
Ontario Securities Commission
Suite 1903, Box 55
20 Queen Street West
Toronto, ON M5H 3S8
Fax: 416-595-8940
e-mail: marketregulation@osc.gov.on.ca
and to:
Kenneth J. Keplacki, Managing Director
Chi-X Canada ATS Limited
The Exchange Tower, Suite 2105
130 King Street West
Toronto, ON M5X 1E3
Fax: 416-368-2562
e-mail: Ken.Klepacki@instinet.com
If the proposed changes do not raise any regulatory concerns, Chi-X Canada ATS Limited may implement the proposed changes by February 2, 2010.
OSC Announces Plans to Enhance Compliance with Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure Requirements for 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 18, 2009
OSC ANNOUNCES PLANS TO ENHANCE COMPLIANCE WITH
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE REQURIEMENS
FOR 2010
TORONTO -- The Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) today issued Notice 51-717 Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure, which communicates the OSC's plans to enhance compliance by reporting issuers (other than investment funds) with corporate governance and environmental disclosure requirements.
This Notice is part of the OSC's corporate sustainability reporting initiative developed in response to a resolution of the Ontario Legislature, passed on April 9, 2009, calling on the OSC to undertake a broad consultation to consider best practice corporate social responsibility and environmental, social and governance disclosure standards. In response, the OSC held consultations with various stakeholders, including a roundtable discussion on September 18, 2009 with respect to its governance and environmental disclosure requirements. The OSC then prepared a report and recommendations that were submitted today to the Ontario Minister of Finance.
"We received valuable feedback from stakeholders and this has formed the basis for the initiatives that we are taking in 2010," said James Turner, Vice-Chair of the OSC. "During the consultations, we heard support for the existing regulatory requirements as well as recommendations for the OSC to provide more guidance to issuers in order to improve the information disclosed to investors and the marketplace. For example, stakeholders said additional guidance would be welcome in respect of disclosure of climate change risk."
In 2010, the OSC will conduct a compliance review of corporate governance disclosure filed by issuers in spring 2010. The OSC will also develop guidance for issuers on compliance with existing environmental disclosure requirements, which are currently set out in National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations. The OSC intends to consult stakeholders in connection with the development of that guidance and to publish the guidance by December 2010, giving reporting issuers sufficient time to consider it when preparing their 2010 annual continuous disclosure documents.
The OSC will invite staff at other Canadian Securities Administrators to participate inthe corporate governance compliance review and the development of the guidance for environmental disclosures.
Notice 51-717 Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure, along with the OSC report to the Minister of Finance and a consultation paper previously prepared by OSC staff, are available on the OSC website, www.osc.gov.on.ca.
For Media Inquiries: |
Wendy Dey |
Director, Communications |
|
& Public Affairs |
|
416-593-8120 |
|
Robert Merrick |
|
Senior Communications Specialist |
|
416-593-2315 |
|
Theresa Ebden |
|
Senior Communications Specialist |
|
416-593-8307 |
|
For Investor Inquiries: |
OSC Contact Centre |
416-593-8314 |
|
1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free) |
|
Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Responses to Frequently Asked Questions About the New National Registration Regime
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 18, 2009
CANADIAN SECURITIES REGULATORS
PUBLISH RESPONSES TO
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
NEW NATIONAL REGISTRATION REGIME
Toronto -- The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) today published Staff Notice 31-313, containing answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs) about the new Canada-wide registration regime.
The FAQ list was created from public enquiries that CSA members received concerning the new regime for the registration of firms and individuals who deal in securities, provide investment advice or manage investment funds.
The key components of the new regime, which came into force on September 28, 2009, include National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions and amendments to National Instrument 33-109 Registration Information. Staff Notice 31-313 was compiled in FAQ format in order to assist those working with these instruments. The Notice will be available on various CSA members' websites and may be updated from time to time.
The CSA, the council of the securities regulators of Canada's provinces and territories, co-ordinates and harmonizes regulation for the Canadian capital markets.
For more information:
Theresa Ebden |
Sylvain Théberge |
Ontario Securities Commission |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
416-593-2361 |
514-940-2176 |
Mark Dickey |
Ken Gracey |
Alberta Securities Commission |
British Columbia Securities Commission |
403-297-4481 |
604-899-6577 |
Ainsley Cunningham |
Wendy Connors-Beckett |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
New Brunswick Securities Commission |
204-945-4733 |
506-643-7745 |
Natalie MacLellan |
Barbara Shourounis |
Nova Scotia Securities Commission |
Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission |
902-424-8586 |
306-787-5842 |
Janice Callbeck |
Doug Connolly |
PEI Securities Office |
Financial Services Regulation Div. |
Office of the Attorney General |
Newfoundland and Labrador |
902-368-6288 |
709-729-2594 |
Fred Pretorius |
Louis Arki |
Yukon Securities Registry |
Nunavut Securities Office |
867-667-5225 |
867-975-6587 |
Donn MacDougall |
|
Northwest Territories |
|
Securities Office |
|
867-920-8984 |
|
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership et al.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
OVERSEA CHINESE FUND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, WEIZHEN TANG AND
ASSOCIATES INC., WEIZHEN TANG CORP.
AND WEIZHEN TANG
TORONTO -- The Commission issued its Decision following a hearing held on November 13, 2009 in the above named matter.
A copy of the Decision dated December 10, 2009 is available at www.osc.gov.on.ca.
For media inquiries: |
Wendy Dey |
Director, Communications |
|
& Public Affairs |
|
416-593-8120 |
|
Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington |
|
Assistant Manager, |
|
Public Affairs |
|
416-593-2361 |
|
For investor inquiries: |
OSC Contact Centre |
416-593-8314 |
|
1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free) |
|
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
IRWIN BOOCK, STANTON DEFREITAS, JASON
WONG, SAUDIA ALLIE, ALENA DUBINSKY,
ALEX KHODJIAINTS, SELECT AMERICAN
TRANSFER CO., LEASESMART, INC.,
ADVANCED GROWING SYSTEMS, INC.,
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LTD., NUTRIONE
CORPORATION, POCKETOP CORPORATION,
ASIA TELECOM LTD., PHARM CONTROL LTD.,
CAMBRIDGE RESOURCES CORPORATION,
COMPUSHARE TRANSFER CORPORATION,
FEDERATED PURCHASER, INC.,
TCC INDUSTRIES, INC., FIRST NATIONAL
ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION,
WGI HOLDINGS, INC. AND ENERBRITE
TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
TORONTO -- The Commission issued an Order in the above named matter which provides that the dates for the hearing of this matter on the merits shall commence on February 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. and shall continue for four weeks excluding the dates of February 2, 15 and 16 or such other dates as may be determined by the parties and the Office of the Secretary.
A copy of the Order dated December 10, 2009 is available at www.osc.gov.on.ca.
For media inquiries: |
Wendy Dey |
Director, Communications |
|
& Public Affairs |
|
416-593-8120 |
|
Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington |
|
Assistant Manager, |
|
Public Affairs |
|
416-593-2361 |
|
For investor inquiries: |
OSC Contact Centre |
416-593-8314 |
|
1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free) |
|
Gold-Quest International et al.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
GOLD-QUEST INTERNATIONAL,
HEALTH AND HARMONEY, IAIN BUCHANAN,
AND LISA BUCHANAN
TORONTO -- The Commission issued an Order which provides that the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents is extended until the completion of the Hearing on the Merits.
A copy of the Order dated December 10, 2009 is available at www.osc.gov.on.ca.
For media inquiries: |
Wendy Dey |
Director, Communications |
|
& Public Affairs |
|
416-593-8120 |
|
Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington |
|
Assistant Manager, |
|
Public Affairs |
|
416-593-2361 |
|
For investor inquiries: |
OSC Contact Centre |
416-593-8314 |
|
1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free) |
|
Gold-Quest International et al.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
GOLD-QUEST INTERNATIONAL,
1725587 ONTARIO INC. carrying on business as
HEALTH AND HARMONEY, HARMONEY CLUB
INC., DONALD IAIN BUCHANAN, LISA
BUCHANAN AND SANDRA GALE
TORONTO -- The Commission issued an Order in the above matter which provides that the Hearing is adjourned to March 25, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. for a full day and March 26, 2010 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., or such other dates as are agreed to by the parties and determined by the Office of the Secretary, for the purpose of considering sanctions for certain of the Respondents and for any other purpose that the parties may advise the Office of the Secretary; and, that the motion for leave of the Commission to withdraw brought by counsel for Sandra Gale is granted and leave of the Commission is granted for counsel to withdraw.
A copy of the Order dated December 10, 2009 is available at www.osc.gov.on.ca
For media inquiries: |
Wendy Dey |
Director, Communications |
|
& Public Affairs |
|
416-593-8120 |
|
Carolyn Shaw-Rimmington |
|
Assistant Manager, |
|
Public Affairs |
|
416-593-2361 |
|
For investor inquiries: |
OSC Contact Centre |
416-593-8314 |
|
1-877-785-1555 (Toll Free) |
|
Canadian Hydro Developers, Inc.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 -- Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Application for an order that the issuer is not a reporting issuer -- issuer has no publicly held securities -- issuer did not provide British Columbia Securities Commission with a notice of surrender of its reporting issuer status -- issuer is in default of certain continuous disclosure obligations.
Ontario Statutes
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., s. 1(10).
December 9, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
BRITISH COLUMBIA, ALBERTA, SASKATCHEWAN,
MANITOBA, ONTARIO, QUÉBEC,
NEW BRUNSWICK, NOVA SCOTIA AND
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
(the Jurisdictions)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
CANADIAN HYDRO DEVELOPERS, INC.
(the Filer)
DECISION
Background
The securities regulatory authority or regulator in each of the Jurisdictions (Decision Maker) has received an application from the Filer under the securities legislation of the Jurisdictions (the Legislation) for a decision under the Legislation to be deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer in the Jurisdictions (the Exemptive Relief Sought).
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a coordinated review application):
(a) the Alberta Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application, and
(b) the decision is the decision of the principal regulator and evidences the decision of each other Decision Maker.
Interpretation
Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions have the same meaning if used in this decision, unless otherwise defined.
Representations
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:
1. The Filer was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (the ABCA).
2. The head office of the Filer is located in Calgary, Alberta.
3. On October 23, 2009, 1478860 Alberta Ltd. (the Offeror) acquired, pursuant to an offer and accompanying take-over bid circular dated July 22, 2009, as amended by a notice of extension dated August 27, 2009, a notice of extension dated September 9, 2009, a notice of extension dated September 21, 2009, a notice of extension dated October 2, 2009, a notice of variation and extension dated October 8, 2009 and a notice of extension dated October 20, 2009 (the Offer), approximately 125,339,544 common shares of the Filer representing approximately 87.1% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Filer (the Common Shares).
4. On November 4, 2009 the Offeror acquired an additional 9,155,361 Common Shares representing, along with the previously acquired 125,339,544 Common Shares, approximately 93.5% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares pursuant to the Offer.
5. On November 4, 2009, the Offeror acquired the balance of the issued and outstanding Common Shares that were not acquired by the Offeror under the Offer pursuant to the compulsory acquisition provisions of Part 16 of the Business Corporations Act (Alberta).
6. Following completion of the Offer on November 4, 2009, the Filer became a wholly-owned subsidiary of 1478860 Alberta Ltd.
7. Prior to the Offer, the authorized capital of the Filer consisted of an unlimited number of Common Shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares (the Preferred Shares), issuable in series, of which 143,801,223 Common Shares and Nil Preferred Shares were issued and outstanding.
8. The Common Shares were delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange on November 9, 2009 and the Filer does not have any other securities listed on any stock exchange.
9. The Filer has no intention to seek public financing by way of an offering of its securities.
10. The outstanding securities of the Filer, including debt securities, are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by fewer than 15 security holders in each of the jurisdictions in Canada and fewer than 51 security holders in total in Canada.
11. No securities of the Filer are traded on a marketplace as defined in National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation.
12. The Filer is applying for a decision that it is not a reporting issuer in all of the jurisdictions in Canada in which it is currently a reporting issuer.
13. The Filer is not in default of any of its obligations under the Legislation as a reporting issuer, other than its obligation to file its interim financial statements and related management's discussion and analysis for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 and the interim certificates under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers' Annual and Interim Filings in respect of its interim filings for the interim period ended September 30, 2009 which were due on November 15, 2009.
14. The Filer was not eligible to use the simplified procedure under CSA Staff Notice 12-307 Applications for a Decision that an Issuer is not a Reporting Issuer as it is a reporting issuer in British Columbia.
15. Upon grant of the Exemptive Relief Sought, the Filer will not be a reporting issuer or the equivalent in any jurisdiction of Canada.
Decision
Each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that he decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the Decision maker to make the decision.
The decision of the Decision Makers under the Legislation is that the Exemptive Relief Sought is granted.
Arise Technologies Corporation and Haverstock Master Fund, Ltd.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Application by a TSX-listed issuer and foreign resident purchaser for exemptive relief in relation to a proposed distribution of securities by the issuer by way of a committed equity facility (often referred to as an "equity line of credit"). A draw down under an equity line may be considered to be an indirect distribution of securities of the issuer to purchasers in the secondary market through the equity line purchaser acting as underwriter. Relief granted to the issuer and purchaser from certain registration and prospectus requirements, subject to terms and conditions, including a 10% restriction on the number of securities that may be distributed under an equity line in any 12-month period, certain restrictions on the permitted activities of the purchaser and certain notification and disclosure requirements.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, ss. 25(1), 25(2), 71(1), 71(2), 74(1), 133 and 147.
National Instrument 44-101 Short Form Prospectus, s. 8.1.
Form 44-101 Short Form Prospectus, item 20.
National Instrument 44-102 Shelf Distributions, ss. 5.5.2, 5.5.3, 11.1.
December 10, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
ONTARIO
(THE JURISDICTION)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
ARISE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(THE ISSUER)
AND
HAVERSTOCK MASTER FUND, LTD.
(THE SUBSCRIBER)
DECISION
BACKGROUND
The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application from the Issuer and the Subscriber (the Filers) for a decision (the Exemption Sought) under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the Legislation) that:
1. in connection with the distribution or distributions (the Distribution) by the Issuer of the ELOC Shares (as defined below) through the Subscriber, as underwriter, to purchasers (TSX Purchasers) who purchase ELOC Shares directly from the Subscriber on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) during the period (the Distribution Period) that commences on the date of commencement of the Pricing Period (as defined below) under a Draw Down Notice (as defined below) delivered under the Committed Equity Facility (as defined below) and ends on the date that is the earlier of:
(a) the date on which the Subscriber notifies the Issuer that the distribution of the ELOC Shares purchased from the Issuer on the Settlement Date (as defined below) has ended, and
(b) the 40th day after the Settlement Date,
the Issuer be exempted from the requirements in the Legislation to include the following information in a prospectus (collectively, the Prospectus Form Requirements):
(i) the statement respecting statutory rights of withdrawal and rescission or damages in the form prescribed in item 20 of Form 44-101F1 Short Form Prospectus (Form 44-101F1) under National Instrument 44-101 Short Form Prospectus Distributions (NI 44-101),
(ii) the second sentence of the disclosure required by section 5.5.2 of National Instrument 44-102 Shelf Distributions (NI 44-102), and
(iii) the statement in section 5.5.3 of NI 44-102;
2. in connection with the Distribution, the Subscriber and its directors, officers and employees be exempted from the requirements in the Legislation that prohibit a person or company from engaging in or holding himself, herself or itself out as engaging in the business of trading in securities unless the person or company is registered as a dealer or is a representative registered as a dealing representative of a registered dealer and is acting on behalf of the registered dealer (the Dealer Registration Requirements);
3. in connection with the Distribution, the Subscriber and its directors, officers and employees be exempted from the requirements in the Legislation that prohibit a person or company from acting as an underwriter unless the person or company is registered as a dealer and is authorized to act as an underwriter in the circumstances or is a representative registered as a dealing representative of such a registered dealer and is acting on behalf of the registered dealer (the Underwriter Registration Requirements); and
4. in connection with the Distribution, the Subscriber and any dealers through whom the Subscriber distributes the ELOC Shares (each a Selling Agent) be exempted from the requirements in the Legislation that a dealer not acting as agent of the purchaser who receives an order to subscribe for or purchase a security offered in a distribution deliver to the purchaser or its agent the prospectus and any amendment to the prospectus not later than the second working day after the subscription or purchase (the Prospectus Delivery Requirements) so, as a consequence, no rights of withdrawal or rights of rescission or damages for non-delivery of the prospectus arise.
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission (the Commission) is the principal regulator for this application; and
(b) the Filers have provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System (MI 11-102) is intended to be relied upon in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories and Nunuvat.
INTERPRETATION
Terms defined in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions and MI 11-102 have the same meaning if used in this decision, unless otherwise defined.
REPRESENTATIONS
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filers:
The Issuer
1. The Issuer is a corporation incorporated and validly existing under the Canada Business Corporations Act. The principal office of the Issuer is located in Waterloo, Ontario.
2. The Issuer is a reporting issuer under the legislation of Ontario, British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, Yukon Territory, Northwest Territories and Nunavut (the Reporting Jurisdictions). The Issuer is not in default of securities legislation in any jurisdiction.
3. The outstanding common shares of the Issuer (the Shares) are listed and posted for trading on the TSX under the symbol APV. The Issuer is authorized to issue an unlimited number of Shares. As of November 24, 2009, there were 133,442,762 Shares issued and outstanding and the aggregate market value of the outstanding Shares was $38.7 million.
4. The Issuer is not currently subject to the reporting requirements of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the 1934 Act).
5. The Issuer is eligible to file a short form prospectus under NI 44-101.
6. The Issuer has filed in the Reporting Jurisdictions and received a decision document dated October 2, 2009 for its unallocated short form base shelf prospectus dated September 29, 2009 (the Base Shelf Prospectus).
The Subscriber
7. The Subscriber is a Cayman Islands company, whose principal business office is located at 1044 Northern Boulevard Roslyn, New York.
8. Neither the Subscriber nor any affiliate of the Subscriber is a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction in Canada or a registrant under US securities legislation. Neither the Subscriber nor any affiliate of the Subscriber is registered with any U.S. or Canadian regulator or other securities regulatory authority as a dealer, advisor or in any other capacity under the legislation in any jurisdiction and is not a member of or participant in any other marketplace (as defined National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation) or of any other self-regulatory organization. In particular, the Subscriber is not (a) a dealer-member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, (b) a participating organization of the TSX, a member of the TSX Venture Exchange, or a member or dealer of the Canadian National Stock Exchange, Pure Trading, Alpha ATS, Chi-X Canada ATS or the Canadian Investor Protection Fund, (c) a broker-dealer registered with the United States Securities Exchange Commission under the 1934 Act, or (d) a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. The Subscriber is not in default of securities legislation in any jurisdiction.
9. The Subscriber has been established to purchase and sell, as principal, securities of public companies, including, without limitation, the purchase of equity securities pursuant to equity draw down facilities like the Committed Equity Facility. Neither the Subscriber, nor any affiliate of the Subscriber, currently participates in equity line financings or similar arrangements with US-listed issuers.
10. The investment manager of the Subscriber is Haverstock Offshore Manager, LLC, a Delaware corporation. As of the date hereof, the share capital of Haverstock Offshore Manager, LLC is owned as follows:
(a) 50% by the N.I.R. Group, LLC, a New York limited liability company which is principally owned and managed by Mr. Corey Ribotsky;
(b) 40% by Targum Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which is owned and managed by Mr. David Ratzker; and
(c) 10% by Eagle Ridge Capital Corporation, an Alberta corporation which is owned and managed by Mr. Cory Gelmon and Mr. Michael Gelmon.
Proposed Distribution of ELOC Shares
11. The Issuer and the Subscriber will enter into an amended and restated committed equity facility agreement (the Committed Equity Facility), whereby the Issuer may, from time to time, require the Subscriber to purchase from treasury Shares (the ELOC Shares) on the following basis (subject always to the Committed Equity Facility becoming effective in accordance with its terms):
(a) During the 36 months after the date of the Committed Equity Facility and subject to certain conditions set forth in the Committed Equity Facility, the Issuer may, in its sole discretion, require the Subscriber to complete one or more subscriptions for up to $500,000 in ELOC Shares (each such issue and sale of ELOC Shares is a Draw Down) by delivering to the Subscriber a Draw Down notice for each Draw Down (each a Draw Down Notice). The Issuer may not deliver another Draw Down Notice until all ELOC Shares issuable pursuant to the prior Draw Down have been delivered to, or to the direction of, the Subscriber. Furthermore, the maximum aggregate subscription amount under the Committed Equity Facility is $10 million.
(b) Pursuant to each Draw Down Notice, the Subscriber will be required to subscribe for and purchase the number of ELOC Shares as is equal to the dollar amount set forth in the Draw Down Notice (the Draw Down Amount), subject to certain adjustments and conditions for the Subscriber's benefit as set out in the Committed Equity Facility.
(c) In each Draw Down Notice, the Issuer is to specify a minimum price for the Subscriber's purchase of ELOC Shares pursuant the applicable Draw Down (the Minimum Price).
(d) The Draw Down Amount for a Draw Down is to be allocated equally over the five consecutive trading days (the Pricing Period) beginning on the commencement date specified in the Draw Down Notice. The number of ELOC Shares that the Subscriber is obligated to purchase for each trading day during the Pricing Period is established by the purchase price for ELOC Shares determined under the Committed Equity Facility.
(e) Under the Committed Equity Facility, the applicable purchase price for the ELOC Shares to be paid by the Subscriber for a trading day during the Pricing Period (Trading Day) is to be the higher of (i) 93.5% of the volume weighted average price of the Shares for the Trading Day (VWAP) or (ii) the Minimum Price (the Trading Day Purchase Price). The number of ELOC Shares to be purchased by the Subscriber for each Trading Day is equal to the Draw Down Amount proportionately allocated to such Trading Day divided by the Trading Day Purchase Price, subject to the Subscriber's right under the Committed Equity Facility to reduce its obligation to subscribe for the Draw Down Amount for such Trading Day, in whole or in part, where the VWAP for the Trading Day is below the Minimum Price (any such reduction of the Subscriber's obligation is a Draw Down Reduction).
(f) In addition to a Draw Down Reduction, the Draw Down Amount for which the Subscriber is obligated in subscribing for ELOC Shares (and, accordingly, the number of ELOC Shares) pursuant to any Draw Down is to be reduced pursuant to the Committed Equity Facility to ensure that the Draw Down Amount does not exceed 5% of the market capitalization of the issued and outstanding Shares as of the applicable closing for the Draw Down (where the market capitalization is determined by multiplying the number of Shares outstanding by the VWAP as at the Settlement Date (as defined below)).
(g) The purchase and sale of ELOC Shares for each Draw Down is to be completed on later of (i) the second TSX trading day after filing of the Pricing Supplement (as defined below) or (ii) the seventh TSX trading day following the Pricing Period (each such closing is a Settlement Date).
12. Forthwith after entering into the Committed Equity Facility, the Issuer will issue a news release and file the agreement on SEDAR. The news release will disclose the material terms and conditions of the Committed Equity Facility, that the agreement and the Base Shelf Prospectus have been filed on SEDAR, when the prospectus supplement and pricing supplements will be filed and how TSX Purchasers may obtain a copy of the Prospectus. A copy of the news release will also be posted on the website of the Issuer.
13. Certain fees are payable by the Issuer to the Subscriber in connection with the Committed Equity Facility. Such fees shall not be satisfied by the issuance of Shares by the Issuer to the Subscriber.
14. Within two business days after entering into the Committed Equity Facility and prior to delivering any Draw Down Notice or completing any distribution of ELOC Shares pursuant to a Draw Down, the Issuer will file in each Reporting Jurisdiction a prospectus supplement to the Base Shelf Prospectus describing the terms of the Committed Equity Facility and relating to the qualification of the distribution of ELOC Shares pursuant to the shelf prospectus procedures prescribed by Parts 8 and 9 of NI 44-102 in connection with the Distribution (the Prospectus Supplement). The Prospectus Supplement will:
(a) qualify the distribution of ELOC Shares to the Subscriber,
(b) qualify the sale of ELOC Shares to TSX Purchasers; and
(c) include the disclosure required by subsection 9.1(3) of NI 44-102 that no underwriter or dealer involved in the Distribution, no affiliate of such an underwriter or dealer and no person or company acting jointly or in concert with such an underwriter or dealer has over-alloted, or will over-allot, securities in connection with the Distribution or effect any other transactions that are intended to stabilize or maintain the market price of the Shares.
15. Within two TSX trading days after the end of the Pricing Period for a particular Draw Down and, in any case, prior to completing any distribution of ELOC Shares pursuant to a Draw Down, the Issuer will file on SEDAR a copy of its pricing supplement to the Base Shelf Prospectus prepared in accordance with the shelf prospectus procedures prescribed by Part 8 and 9 of NI 44-102 and describing the terms and conditions applicable to the distribution of ELOC Shares pursuant to the Draw Down Notice delivered to the Subscriber under the Committed Equity Facility that are not disclosed in the Base Shelf Prospectus, including without limitation, disclosure of the number of ELOC Shares issued and sold pursuant to the Draw Down to the Subscriber and the Subscriber's average purchase price per ELOC Share, all as determined in accordance with the Committed Equity Facility after completion of the Pricing Period (such a pricing supplement to the Base Shelf Prospectus is a Pricing Supplement) (the Base Shelf Prospectus together with the Prospectus Supplement and the applicable Pricing Supplement, as may be amended or restated from time to time, are referred to in this decision as the Prospectus).
16. The Committed Equity Facility will provide that during the term of the Committed Equity Facility neither the Subscriber nor any of its affiliates will sell Shares other than those (a) that the Subscriber reasonably expects to have the obligation to purchase under the terms of the Committed Equity Facility or (b) held in any accounts directly or indirectly managed by the Subscriber.
17. After receipt of a Draw Down Notice, the Subscriber may seek to sell the ELOC Shares purchased under the Draw Down, or engage in hedging strategies, in order to reduce the economic risk associated with the purchase of securities of the Issuer.
18. Under the Committed Equity Facility, the Subscriber, its affiliates, associates, partners and insiders, will agree not to hold a net short position in Shares during the term of the Committed Equity Facility. Accordingly, the Subscriber may sell Shares to hedge their obligation to purchase ELOC Shares under a Draw Down Notice provided that:
(a) The Subscriber complies with applicable TSX regulations and securities legislation;
(b) The Subscriber will not during a Pricing Period, together with any affiliate, associate, subsidiaries, partners or insiders, sell that number of Shares which exceeds that number of ELOC Shares the Subscriber will be required to purchase in connection with the Draw Down Notice.
19. The Subscriber may, but is not obligated to, sell ELOC Shares it has acquired under a Draw Down on a non-fixed price basis during the Distribution Period.
20. The Subscriber may be considered to be acting as an underwriter (as defined in the Legislation) in connection with the Distribution and a Draw Down under the Committed Equity Facility may be considered to be an indirect distribution of the ELOC Shares by the Issuer to TSX Purchasers with the Subscriber acting as the underwriter of the Distribution.
21. A person or company acting as an underwriter is subject to the Underwriter Registration Requirements.
22. The Subscriber and the Selling Agents will affect all sales of ELOC Shares during the Distribution Period, other than those made to a lender of Shares, through the TSX.
23. The Committed Equity Facility will provide that, at the time of each Draw Down Notice and each sale of ELOC Shares, the Issuer will make a representation to the Subscriber that the Prospectus contains full, true and plain disclosure of all material facts relating to the Issuer and the ELOC Shares being distributed. The Issuer would therefore be unable to proceed with sales of ELOC Shares when it is in possession of undisclosed information that would constitute a material fact or a material change in respect of the ELOC Shares.
Disclosure of Distribution of ELOC Shares
24. Upon issuing a Draw Down Notice, the Issuer will disseminate a news release disclosing the issuance of the Draw Down Notice and specifying that the Base Shelf Prospectus and the Prospectus Supplement are filed on SEDAR. In addition, if the Issuer determines that the sale of the number of ELOC Shares specified in the Draw Down Notice constitutes a material fact or material change, the Issuer will simultaneously file a material change report.
25. On or before each Settlement Date, the Issuer is to have disseminated a news release regarding the issue and sale of ELOC Shares for that Draw Down. The news release is to specify the number of ELOC Shares and the Subscriber's average purchase price for each ELOC Share that has been issued and sold under the Draw Down, all as determined in accordance with the Committed Equity Facility after completion of the Pricing Period, indicate that the Pricing Supplement in respect of the Draw Down has been filed on SEDAR, and specify where and how prospective TSX Purchasers may obtain a copy of the Committed Equity Facility, the Base Shelf Prospectus, the Prospectus Supplement applicable to the Committed Equity Facility, and the Pricing Supplement applicable to the Draw Down. The Issuer is to post copies of the Draw Down news releases on its website.
26. In determining whether the sale of the number of ELOC Shares specified in the Draw Down Notice would constitute a material fact or material change, the Issuer will take into account a number of factors, including, without limitation: (a) the parameters of the Draw Down Notice including the number of ELOC Shares proposed to be sold; (b) the percentage of the outstanding Shares that the number of ELOC Shares represents; (c) the difference between the recent market price of the Shares and the Minimum Price specified in the Draw Down Notice (d) trading volume and volatility of Shares; (e) recent developments in the business, affairs and capital structure of the Issuer; and (f) prevailing market conditions generally.
Prospectus Qualification of the Distribution of ELOC Shares
27. The Base Shelf Prospectus, as supplemented by the Prospectus Supplement, as amended, will qualify the Distribution of the ELOC Shares to TSX Purchasers during the Distribution Period.
28. The Base Shelf Prospectus, as supplemented by the Prospectus Supplement, as amended, and the Pricing Supplement will qualify the Distribution of the Shares to the Subscriber as described in the Pricing Supplement.
29. The Prospectus Supplement will contain an underwriter's certificate in the form set out in section 2.2(b) of Appendix B to NI 44-102 signed by the Subscriber.
30. A dealer not acting as agent of the purchaser who sells securities offered in a distribution to which the prospectus requirement applies is subject to the Prospectus Delivery Requirements.
31. The Subscriber is seeking an exemption from the Prospectus Delivery Requirements on behalf of itself and Selling Agents through whom it sells the ELOC Shares because TSX Purchasers will not be readily identifiable as the Selling Agent acting on behalf of the Subscriber may combine the sell orders made under the Prospectus with other sell orders and the dealer acting on behalf of a TSX Purchaser may combine a number of purchase orders.
32. The Issuer will disclose the number and price of ELOC Shares sold to the Subscriber under the Committed Equity Facility in its annual financial statements and MD&A filed on SEDAR.
DECISION
The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.
The decision of the principal regulator under the Legislation is that the Exemption Sought is granted provided that:
1. in connection with a Distribution, the Issuer is exempted from the Prospectus Form Requirements so long as:
(a) the number of Shares distributed by the Issuer under one or more equity lines of credit, including the Committed Equity Facility, during any 12-month period in the term of the Committed Equity Facility does not exceed 10 per cent of the aggregate number of Shares outstanding at the beginning of such 12-month period;
(b) the Issuer issues a news release immediately:
(i) upon entering into the Committed Equity Facility, disclosing certain terms of the Committed Equity Facility including the aggregate maximum issue price of the ELOC Shares that may be distributed under the Committed Equity Facility, and
(ii) upon delivery of a Draw Down Notice to the Subscriber if the maximum dollar value of ELOC Shares the Subscriber may be obligated to purchase exceeds 2 per cent of the aggregate market value of the Shares issued and outstanding at the date of delivery of the Draw Down Notice;
(c) the Issuer files the Prospectus Supplement that (i) qualifies the distribution of the ELOC Shares to the Subscriber and the distribution of the ELOC Shares to the TSX Purchasers during the Distribution Period; and (ii) includes the disclosure required by section 9.1(3) of NI 44-102;
(d) the Issuer files a Pricing Supplement within two business days after the end of the Pricing Period with respect to each Draw Down disclosing the number of ELOC Shares sold pursuant to that Draw Down to the Subscriber and the price per ELOC Share;
(e) the Issuer delivers to the Commission and the TSX, upon request, a copy of each Draw Down notice delivered by the Issuer to the Subscriber under the Committed Equity Facility; and
(f) in lieu of the statement respecting statutory rights of withdrawal and rescission or damages in the form prescribed in item 20 of Form 44-101F1, the Issuer includes in the Prospectus Supplement the following statement:
"Securities legislation in the jurisdictions provides purchasers with the right to withdraw from an agreement to purchase securities and with remedies for rescission or damages if the prospectus, prospectus supplements relating to securities purchased by a purchaser and any amendment are not delivered to the purchaser, provided that the remedies are exercised by the purchaser within the time limit prescribed by securities legislation.
However, TSX Purchasers of ELOC Shares will not have any right to withdraw from an agreement to purchase the ELOC Shares and will not have remedies of rescission or damages for non-delivery of the Prospectus because the Prospectus relating to ELOC Shares purchased by a TSX Purchaser will not be delivered as permitted under a decision document granting exemptive relief dated •, 2009.
Securities legislation in the jurisdictions also provides purchasers with remedies for rescission or damages if the prospectus, prospectus supplements relating to securities purchased by a purchaser and any amendment contain a misrepresentation, provided that the remedies are exercised by the purchaser within the time limit prescribed by securities legislation. Any remedies under securities legislation in the jurisdictions that a TSX Purchaser of ELOC Shares may have against the Issuer or the Subscriber for rescission or damages if the prospectus, prospectus supplements relating relating to securities purchased by a purchaser and any amendment contain a misrepresentation remain unaffected by the non-delivery of the Prospectus and the decision document referred to above.
TSX Purchasers should refer to the applicable provisions of the securities legislation and the decision document referred to above for the particulars of their rights or consult with a legal adviser."
2. in connection with a Distribution, the Subscriber and its officers, directors and employees are exempted from the Dealer Registration Requirements and the Underwriter Registration Requirements so long as:
(a) the Subscriber does not solicit offers to purchase the ELOC Shares in any Reporting Jurisdictions and effects all Distributions of ELOC Shares during Distribution Period through the TSX using a dealer unaffiliated with the Subscriber or the Issuer;
(b) no extraordinary commission or consideration is paid by the Subscriber to a person or company in respect of the Distribution of ELOC Shares; and
(c) the Subscriber makes available to the Commission, upon request, full particulars of trading and hedging activities by the Subscriber (and, if relevant, trading and hedging activities by affiliates of the Subscriber) in relation to securities of the Issuer during the term of the Committed Equity Facility;
3. in connection with a Distribution, the Subscriber and any Selling Agents through whom the Subscriber distributes the ELOC Shares are exempted from the Prospectus Delivery Requirements so long as the conditions in the immediately preceding paragraph 2 are met; and
4. this decision will terminate on the date that is 25 months after the date on which the Prospectus Supplement is filed in the Jurisdiction.
As to the Exemption Sought from the Prospectus Form Requirements:
As to the Exemption Sought from the Dealer Registration Requirements, the Underwriter Registration Requirements and the Prospectus Delivery Requirements:
Selkirk Metals Corp. -- s. 1(10)
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Issuer deemed to no longer be a reporting issuer under securities legislation.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., s. 1(10).
Citation: Selkirk Metals Corp., Re, 2009 ABASC 611
December 9, 2009
Attention: Brian W. Lindsay
Dear Sir:
Re: |
Selkirk Metals Corp.(the Applicant) -- Application for a decision under the securities legislation of British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario and Québec (the Jurisdictions) that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer |
The Applicant has applied to the local securities regulatory authority or regulator (the Decision Maker) in each of the Jurisdictions for a decision under the securities legislation (the Legislation) of the Jurisdictions to be deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer in the Jurisdictions.
As the Applicant has represented to the Decision Makers that:
(a) the outstanding securities of the Applicant, including debt securities, are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by fewer than 15 security holders in each of the jurisdictions in Canada and fewer than 51 security holders in total in Canada;
(b) no securities of the Applicant are traded on a marketplace as defined in National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation;
(c) the Applicant is applying for a decision that it is not a reporting issuer in all of the jurisdictions in Canada in which it is currently a reporting issuer; and
(d) the Applicant is not in default of any of its obligations under the Legislation as a reporting issuer,
each of the Decision Makers is satisfied that the test contained in the Legislation that provides the Decision Maker with the jurisdiction to make the decision has been met and orders that the Applicant is deemed to have ceased to be a reporting issuer and that the Applicant's status as a reporting issuer is revoked.
Big 8 Split Inc. and TD Securities Inc.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 -- Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- subdivided offering -- in connection with offering of Class C preferred shares -- the prohibitions contained in the Legislation against trading in portfolio shares by persons or companies having information concerning the trading programs of mutual funds shall not apply to administrator with respect to certain principal trades with the issuer in securities comprising the Issuer's portfolio -- issuer's portfolio consisting of shares of five Canadian banks and three Canadian insurance companies.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., ss. 119, 121(2)(a)(ii).
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
ONTARIO
(the "Jurisdiction")
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
BIG 8 SPLIT INC.
(the "Filer")
AND
TD SECURITIES INC.
("TD Securities")
DECISION
Background
The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application from the Filer under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the "Legislation") for a decision that the prohibitions contained in Section 119 of the Securities Act (Ontario) (the "OSA") against trading in portfolio shares by persons or companies having information concerning the trading programs of mutual funds shall not apply to TD Securities in connection with Principal Sales and Principal Purchases (each defined below) with respect to the public offering (the "Offering") of class C preferred shares (the "Class C Preferred Shares") of the Filer (the "Exemption Sought").
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application; and
(b) the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multinational Instrument 11-102 Passport System ("MI 11-102") is intended to be relied upon in the jurisdictions of Alberta, Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador.
Interpretation
Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions and MI 11-102 have the same meaning if used in this decision unless otherwise defined.
Representations
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:
The Filer
1. The Filer was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on June 26, 2003 and became a reporting issuer under the OSA by filing a final prospectus dated August 28, 2003 relating to an initial public offering of class A capital shares (the "Capital Shares") and class A preferred shares completed on September 3, 2003.
2. The authorized capital of the Filer consists of an unlimited number of Capital Shares, an unlimited number of Class A preferred shares, an unlimited number of Class B, Class C and Class D preferred shares issuable in series, an unlimited number of Class B, Class C and Class D capital shares issuable in series, and an unlimited number of Class E voting shares ("Class E Shares").
3. Currently there are 1,204,980 Capital Shares and 1,204,980 Class B preferred shares, Series 1 (the "Class B Preferred Shares") issued and outstanding.
4. The Filer is offering Class C Preferred Shares and Capital Shares pursuant to a final prospectus (the "Prospectus"). Immediately prior to closing of the Offering, the Filer intends to pay a dividend in Capital Shares to holders of Capital Shares (the "Share Dividend"). As a result, and in order to maintain the same number of Capital Shares and preferred shares of all classes outstanding, the Filer is offering a greater number of Class C Preferred Shares than Capital Shares. However, after giving effect to this Offering and the Share Dividend, there will be an equal number of Capital Shares and preferred shares of the Filer outstanding.
5. The Filer filed the Prospectus in each of the provinces of Canada on December 8, 2009 (SEDAR Project No. 1489705).
6. The Capital Shares and the Class B Preferred Shares will continue to be listed and posted for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX"). The TSX has conditionally approved the listing of the Class C Preferred Shares and the additional Capital Shares.
7. The Class E Shares are the only voting shares in the capital of the Filer. There are currently 100 Class E Shares issued and outstanding. All of the issued and outstanding Class E Shares are owned by Big 8 Split Trust, a trust established for holders from time to time of preferred shares and Capital Shares of the Filer.
8. The Capital Shares and Class C Preferred Shares may be surrendered for retraction at any time in the manner described in the Prospectus.
9. The Filer has a board of directors (the "Board of Directors") which currently consists of five directors, three of which are independent directors who are not employees of TD Securities. Also, the offices of President/Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer/Secretary of the Filer are held by employees of TD Securities.
10. The Filer is a passive investment company whose principal investment objective is to invest in a portfolio of common shares (the "Portfolio Shares") of Bank of Montreal, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Great-West Lifeco Inc., Manulife Financial Corporation and Sun Life Financial Inc. (collectively, the "Financial Institutions") in order to generate fixed cumulative preferential distributions for holders of the Filer's Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares, and to allow the holders of the Filer's Capital Shares to participate in the capital appreciation of the Portfolio Shares after payment of administrative and operating expenses of the Filer. It will be the policy of the Board of Directors to pay dividends on the Capital Shares in an amount equal to the dividends received by the Filer on the Portfolio Shares minus the distributions payable on the Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares and all administrative and operating expenses of the Filer.
11. Class C Preferred Share distributions will be funded from the dividends received on the Portfolio Shares. If necessary, any shortfall in the distributions on the Class C Preferred Shares will be funded by proceeds from the sale of Portfolio Shares.
12. The record date for the payment of Class C Preferred Share distributions, Capital Share dividends or other distributions of the Filer will be set in accordance with the applicable requirements of the TSX.
13. Any outstanding Capital Shares and preferred shares will be redeemed by the Filer on December 15, 2013.
14. The Filer is considered to be a mutual fund, as defined in the Legislation. Since the Filer does not operate as a conventional mutual fund, it is making an application for a waiver from certain requirements of National Instrument 81-102 -- Mutual Funds.
15. The policy of the Filer is to maintain a fixed portfolio and not engage in trading except in limited circumstances, including to fund retractions of preferred shares and Capital Shares.
16. The Portfolio Shares are listed and traded on the TSX.
17. The Filer is not, and will not upon the completion of the Offering be, an insider of the Financial Institutions within the meaning of the Legislation.
The Offering
18. The net proceeds from the Offering will be used by the Filer to fund the purchase of additional Portfolio Shares.
19. The Prospectus discloses selected financial information and dividend and trading history of the Portfolio Shares.
20. As discussed above, the TSX has conditionally approved the listing of the Class C Preferred Shares and additional Capital Shares on the TSX and all of the Capital Shares and preferred shares outstanding will be redeemed by the Filer on December 15, 2013.
TD Securities
21. TD Securities was incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and is a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of The Toronto-Dominion Bank. TD Securities is registered under the Legislation as a dealer in the categories of "broker" and "investment dealer" and is a member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada and a participant in the TSX.
22. Pursuant to an agency agreement made between the Filer and TD Securities and other agents appointed by the Filer (the "Agents"), the Filer appointed the Agents, as its agents, to offer the Capital Shares and the Class C Preferred Shares of the Filer on a best efforts basis and the Prospectus qualifying the Offering contains a certificate signed by the Agents, in accordance with the Legislation.
23. Pursuant to an administration agreement between TD Sponsored Companies Inc. ("TD SCI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of TD Securities, and the Filer, the Filer retained TD SCI to administer the ongoing operations of the Filer and will pay TD SCI a monthly fee of 1/12 of 0.25% of the market value of the Portfolio Shares held by the Filer from and after December 15, 2008.
24. TD SCI and TD Securities' economic interest in the Filer and in the material transactions involving the Filer are disclosed in the Prospectus under the heading "Interests of Management and Others in Material Transactions" and include the following:
(a) agency fees with respect to the Offering;
(b) commissions in respect of the disposition of Portfolio Shares to fund a redemption, retraction or purchase for cancellation of the Capital Shares and preferred shares;
(c) interest and reimbursement of expenses, in connection with any acquisition of Portfolio Shares; and
(d) amounts in connection with Principal Sales and Principal Purchases (as described below).
The Principal Trades
25. Through TD Securities, the Filer may purchase Portfolio Shares in the market on commercial terms or from non-related parties with whom TD Securities and the Filer deal at arm's length. Subject to regulatory approval, certain of such Portfolio Shares may also be purchased from TD Securities, as principal (the "Principal Sales").
26. TD Securities may receive commissions not exceeding normal market rates in respect of its purchase of Portfolio Shares, as agent on behalf of the Filer, and the Filer will pay any carrying costs or other expenses incurred by TD Securities, on behalf of the Filer, in connection with its purchase of Portfolio Shares, as agent on behalf of the Filer. In respect of any Principal Sales made to the Filer by TD Securities as principal, TD Securities may realize a financial benefit to the extent that the proceeds received from the Filer exceed the aggregate cost to TD Securities of such Portfolio Shares. Similarly, the proceeds received from the Filer may be less than the aggregate cost to TD Securities of the Portfolio Shares and TD Securities may realize a financial loss.
27. The Prospectus discloses that any Principal Sales will be made in accordance with the rules of the applicable stock exchange and the price paid to TD Securities (inclusive of all transaction costs, if any) will not be greater than the price which would have been paid (inclusive of all transaction costs, if any) if the acquisition had been made through the facilities of the principal stock exchange on which the Portfolio Shares are listed and posted for trading at the time of the purchase from TD Securities.
28. TD Securities will not receive any commissions from the Filer in connection with the Principal Sales and all Principal Sales will be approved by the independent directors of the Filer. In carrying out the Principal Sales, TD Securities will deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with the Filer.
29. TD Securities may sell Portfolio Shares to fund retractions of Capital Shares, Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares prior to the Redemption Date and upon liquidation of the Portfolio Shares in connection with the final redemption of Capital Shares and Class C Preferred Shares on the Redemption Date. These sales will be made by TD Securities as agent on behalf of the Filer, but in certain circumstances, such as where a small number of Capital Shares, Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares have been surrendered for retraction, TD Securities may purchase Portfolio Shares as principal (the "Principal Purchases") subject to receipt of all regulatory approvals.
30. In connection with any Principal Purchases, TD Securities will comply with the rules, procedures and policies of the applicable stock exchange of which they are members and in accordance with orders obtained from all applicable securities regulatory authorities. The Prospectus discloses that TD Securities may realize a gain or loss on the resale of such securities.
31. TD Securities will take reasonable steps, such as soliciting bids from other market participants or such other steps as TD Securities, in its discretion, considers appropriate after taking into account prevailing market conditions and other relevant factors, to enable the Filer to obtain the best price reasonably available for the Portfolio Shares so long as the price obtained (net of all transaction costs, if any) by the Filer from TD Securities is at least as advantageous to the Filer as the price which is available (net of all transaction costs, if any) through the facilities of the applicable stock exchange at the time of the trade.
32. TD Securities will not receive any commissions from the Filer in connection with Principal Purchases and, in carrying out the Principal Purchases, TD Securities shall deal fairly, honestly and in good faith with the Filer.
Decision
The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.
The decision of the principal regulator under the Legislation is that the Exemption Sought is granted.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 -- Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Exemptive relief granted to an exchange traded fund from certain mutual fund requirements and restrictions on calculation and payment of redemptions in connection with offering of Class C preferred shares -- Since investors will generally buy and sell units through the TSX, there are adequate protections and it would not be prejudicial to investors -- National Instrument 81-102 -- Mutual Funds.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
National Instrument 81-102 Mutual Funds, ss. 10.3, 10.4(1).
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
ONTARIO
(the "Jurisdiction")
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PROCESS FOR EXEMPTIVE RELIEF
APPLICATIONS IN MULTIPLE JURISDICTIONS
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
BIG 8 SPLIT INC.
DECISION
Background
The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application from Big 8 Split Inc. (the "Filer") for a decision under the securities legislation of the Jurisdiction of the principal regulator (the "Legislation") for relief from the following sections of National Instrument 81-102 Mutual Funds ("NI 81-102") with respect to the class C preferred shares (the "Class C Preferred Shares") proposed to be issued by the Filer as described in a prospectus dated December 8, 2009 (the "Prospectus"):
(a) section 10.3, which requires that the redemption price of a security of a mutual fund to which a redemption order pertains shall be the net asset value of a security of that class, or series of class, next determined after the receipt by the mutual fund of the order; and
(b) subsection 10.4(1), which requires that a mutual fund shall pay the redemption price for securities that are the subject of a redemption order within three business days after the date of calculation of the net asset value per security used in establishing the redemption price
("Exemption Sought").
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application, and
(b) the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multinational Instrument 11-102 Passport System ("MI 11-102") is intended to be relied upon in the jurisdictions of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador.
Interpretation
Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions and MI 11-102 have the same meaning if used in this decision unless otherwise defined.
Representations
This decision is based on the following facts represented by the Filer:
The Filer
1. The Filer was incorporated under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) on June 26, 2003 and completed an initial public offering of capital shares ("Capital Shares") and preferred shares on September 3, 2003.
2. Currently there are 1,204,980 Capital Shares and 1,204,980 Class B Preferred Shares issued and outstanding.
3. The Filer is offering Class C Preferred Shares and Capital Shares pursuant to the Prospectus (the "Offering"). Immediately prior to closing of the Offering, the Filer intends to declare and pay a dividend in Capital Shares to holders of Capital Shares (the "Share Dividend"). As a result, and in order to maintain the same number of Capital Shares and preferred shares of all classes outstanding, the Filer is offering a greater number of Class C Preferred Shares than Capital Shares. However, after giving effect to this Offering and the Share Dividend, there will be an equal number of Capital Shares and preferred shares of the Filer outstanding.
4. The Capital Shares and the Class B Preferred Shares will continue to be listed and posted for trading on The Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX"). The TSX has conditionally approved the listing of the Class C Preferred Shares and the additional Capital Shares.
5. The Filer is a passive investment company whose principal investment objective is to invest in a portfolio (the "Portfolio") of common shares (the "Portfolio Shares") of Bank of Montreal, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, Great-West Lifeco Inc., Manulife Financial Corporation and Sun Life Financial Inc. in order to generate fixed cumulative preferential distributions for holders of the Filer's Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares, and to allow the holders of the Filer's Capital Shares to participate in the capital appreciation of the Portfolio Shares after payment of administrative and operating expenses of the Filer. It will be the policy of the Board of Directors of the Filer to pay dividends on the Capital Shares in an amount equal to the dividends received by the Filer on the Portfolio Shares minus the distributions payable on the Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares and all administrative and operating expenses of the Filer.
6. The net proceeds from the Offering will be used by the Filer to fund the purchase of additional Portfolio Shares. Holders of Class B Preferred Shares, Class C Preferred Shares and Capital Shares will have no voting rights with respect to the Portfolio Shares.
7. The policy of the Filer is to maintain a fixed portfolio and not engage in trading except in limited circumstances, including to fund retractions of preferred shares and Capital Shares.
8. Class B Preferred Share distributions and Class C Preferred Share distributions will be funded from the dividends received on the Portfolio Shares. If necessary, any shortfall in the distributions on the Class B Preferred Shares and Class C Preferred Shares will be funded by proceeds from the sale of Portfolio Shares.
9. The record date for the payment of Class B Preferred Share and Class C Preferred Share distributions, Capital Share dividends or other distributions of the Filer will be set in accordance with the applicable requirements of the TSX.
10. The Class C Preferred Shares may be surrendered for retraction at any time. Retraction payments for Class C Preferred Shares will be made on the Retraction Payment Date (as defined in the Prospectus) provided the Class C Preferred Shares have been surrendered for retraction at least 10 business days prior to the Retraction Payment Date (as defined in the Prospectus). While the Filer's Unit Value (as defined in the Prospectus) is calculated weekly, the retraction price for the Class C Preferred Shares will be determined based on the Unit Value in effect as at the Valuation Date (as defined in the Prospectus).
11. Any outstanding Capital Shares or preferred shares will be redeemed by the Filer on December 15, 2013.
Decision
The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.
The decision of the principal regulator is that the Exemption Sought is granted as follows:
(a) section 10.3 -- to permit the Filer to calculate the retraction price for the Class C Preferred Shares in the manner described in the Prospectus and on the applicable Valuation Date as defined in the Prospectus; and
(b) subsection 10.4(1) -- to permit the Filer to pay the retraction price for the Class C Preferred Shares on the Retraction Payment Date, as defined in the Prospectus.
Invesco Trimark Ltd. and Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.
Headnote
National Policy 11-203 Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions -- Relief granted from the Act and NI 31-103 to permit registered portfolio managers to engage the pooled funds they advise, in fund-of-fund investments and in in-species transactions -- the portfolio managers advise both the top and bottom funds and one portfolio manager acts or may act as trustee of the top and bottom funds -- pooled funds are 'associates' of one of the portfolio managers - reporting relief also granted from the monthly reporting requirements under the Act.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act (Ontario), ss. 111(2)(b), 111(3), 113, 117(1)(a), 117(2).
National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, ss. 13.5(2)(b)(ii) and (iii), 15.1.
December 11, 2009
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES LEGISLATION OF
ONTARIO
(the Jurisdiction)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
INVESCO TRIMARK LTD.
(Invesco)
AND
INVESCO INSTITUTIONAL (N.A.), INC.
(Invesco N.A.)
(Invesco and Invesco N.A. collectively, the Filers)
DECISION
Background
The principal regulator in the Jurisdiction has received an application from the Filers on their behalf and on behalf of the mutual funds set out in Schedule A hereto (the Existing Pooled Funds, and individually, an Existing Pooled Fund) and other mutual funds that may be established and managed by Invesco from time to time (the Future Pooled Funds, together with the Existing Pooled Funds, the Pooled Funds) for a decision under the securities legislation of the principal regulator (the Legislation):
(a) pursuant to section 15.1 of National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions (NI 31-103), exempting the Filers from the prohibitions contained in section 13.5(2)(b)(ii) and (iii) of NI 31-103 that prohibit a registered adviser from knowingly causing an investment portfolio managed by it, including an investment fund for which it acts as an adviser, to purchase or sell a security from or to the investment portfolio of an "associate" of a "responsible person" as defined in the Legislation, or from or to an investment fund for which the responsible person acts as an adviser, to permit the purchase and sale of portfolio securities between:
(i) the Trimark Balanced Pool (the Balanced Pool) and the Invesco Core Canadian Fixed Income Pool (to be established on or about December 15, 2009) (the Canadian Fixed Income Pool);
(ii) the Balanced Pool and the Trimark Canadian Equity Pool (Canadian Equity Pool); and
(iii) any other Pooled Funds managed by Invesco in respect of which the Filers act as registered advisers,
(each an In-Specie Transaction, and the above section (a) is collectively, the In-Species Relief); and
(b) pursuant to section 113 of the Act for relief from the following provisions:
(i) section 111(2)(b) of the Act which prohibits a mutual fund in Ontario against knowingly making an investment in a person or company in which the mutual fund, alone or together with one or more related mutual funds, is a substantial security holder; and
(ii) section 111(3) of the Act, which prohibits a mutual fund in Ontario or its management company or its distribution company against knowingly holding an investment described in (i) above,
to permit:
(iii) the Balanced Pool to invest in the Canadian Equity Pool and the Canadian Fixed Income Pool;
(iv) an Existing Pooled Fund to invest in one or more other Existing Pooled Funds or Future Pooled Funds; and
(v) a Future Pooled Fund, to invest in one or more Existing Pooled Funds or Future Pooled Funds
(the above section (b) is collectively, the Related Issuer Relief); and
(c) pursuant to section 117(2) of the Act for relief from the requirement under section 117(1)(a) of the Act to file a report of every transaction of purchase or sale of securities between a mutual fund and any related person or company ( collectively, the Reporting Relief).
Under the Process for Exemptive Relief Applications in Multiple Jurisdictions (for a passport application):
(a) the Ontario Securities Commission is the principal regulator for this application; and
(b) in respect of the In-Species Relief, the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of Multilateral Instrument 11-102 Passport System (MI 11-102) is intended to be relied upon in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia , Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador;
(c) in respect of the Related Issuer Relief and the Reporting Relief, the Filer has provided notice that section 4.7(1) of MI 11-102 is intended to be relied upon in Alberta.
Interpretation
Defined terms contained in National Instrument 14-101 Definitions have the same meaning in this decision unless they are defined in this decision.
Representations
1. Invesco is a corporation amalgamated under the laws of the Province of Ontario and has its registered head office in Toronto, Ontario.
2. Invesco is registered in Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador as a dealer in the category of exempt market dealer and as an adviser in the category of portfolio manager, and is registered in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island as an adviser in the category of portfolio manager.
3. Invesco is the trustee, manager and portfolio manager of the Existing Pooled Funds and will be the trustee, manager and portfolio manager of the Future Pooled Funds.
4. Invesco N.A. is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of Delaware, U.S.A.
5. Invesco N.A. is registered as an adviser in the category of portfolio manager in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Ontario and Newfoundland and Labrador and is registered in the United States as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.
6. Invesco N.A. provides investment advisory services to the Pooled Funds in connection with the cash portion of their assets.
7. Securities of the Pooled Funds are, or will be, sold solely to investors in Canada pursuant to exemptions from the prospectus requirements in accordance with National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus and Registration Exemptions (NI 45-106).
8. Each of the Pooled Funds is, or will be, a "mutual fund" and a "mutual fund in Ontario" as defined in the Ontario Act and a "mutual fund" as defined in the Alberta Act.
9. None of the Pooled Funds is, or will become, a "reporting issuer", as defined in the Act. Each Pooled Fund is not in default of securities legislation in any province or territory of Canada.
10. The Filers are not reporting issuers in any jurisdiction of Canada and are not in default of securities legislation in any province or territory of Canada.
In-Specie Transactions:
11. The Filers wish to engage in In-Specie Transactions pursuant to which:
(a) the Balanced Pool will purchase units of the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and as payment for the units make good delivery to the Canadian Fixed Income Pool of debt securities (the Debt Securities);
(b) the Balanced Pool will purchase units of the Canadian Equity Pool and as payment for the units make good delivery to the Canadian Equity Pool of equity securities (the Equity Securities); and
(c) a Pooled Fund will purchase units of another Pooled Fund and as payment for the units make good delivery of securities that meet the investment criteria of that Pooled Fund.
12. The investment objective of the Balanced Pool is to achieve strong capital growth and current income over the long-term by investing primarily in a diversified portfolio of equity and debt securities.
13. The investment objective of the Canadian Equity Pool is to achieve strong capital growth over the long-term by investing primarily in equity securities of Canadian issuers.
14. The investment objective of the Canadian Fixed Income Pool is to achieve a combination of current income and capital growth over the long-term by investing primarily in high-quality Canadian government and corporate debt securities.
15. The Debt Securities and the Equity Securities meet the investment criteria of the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and Canadian Equity Pool respectively. The Filer considers an investment by the Balanced Fund in units of the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and the Canadian Equity Pool by way of In-Specie Transaction, to be a more cost effective and efficient way for the Balanced Fund to achieve exposure to the Debt Securities and the Equity Securities than a direct investment in those securities.
16. In the circumstances, instead of the Balanced Pool disposing of the Debt Securities and the Equity Securities and the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and Canadian Equity Pool respectively purchasing the same securities and incurring unnecessary brokerage costs, the Debt Securities and the Equity Securities would, pursuant to each In-Specie Transaction, be acquired by the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and Canadian Equity Pool respectively.
17. The Filers also consider an investment by one or more Pooled Funds in units of other Pooled Funds by way of In-Specie Transaction, to be a more cost effective and efficient way for the Pooled Funds to acquire and dispose of securities with other Pooled Funds.
18. It is anticipated that each In-Specie Transaction will be executed by Invesco or by one of its affiliates.
19. None of the securities which are the subject of each In-Specie Transaction will be securities of related issuers of the Filers.
20. As the Filers are portfolio managers of the Balanced Pool, the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and the Canadian Equity Pool, and are or may be portfolio managers of other Pooled Funds, each Filer would be considered to be a "responsible person" within the meaning of the applicable provisions of NI 31-103. As Invesco is the trustee of the Balanced Pooled, the Canadian Fixed Income Pool and the Canadian Equity Pool, and is or will be the trustee of other Pooled Funds, each Pooled Fund will be an "associate" of a responsible person within the meaning of the applicable provisions of the Legislation. Accordingly, without the In-Species Relief, the Filers would be prohibited from engaging the Pooled Funds in each In-Specie Transaction.
21. Each In-Specie Transaction will represent the business judgment of the Filers uninfluenced by considerations other than the best interests of the Pooled Funds concerned.
Fund-on-Fund Structure
22. Invesco wishes to cause the Balanced Pool to invest in units of the Canadian Equity Pool and the Canadian Fixed Income Pool. Invesco may from time to time, also wish to cause other Pooled Funds to invest in units of one or more of the Pooled Funds. A Pooled Fund that invests in another Pooled Fund is referred to as the Top Fund and the Pooled Fund that a Top Fund invests in is referred to as the Underlying Fund (each investment by a Top Fund in an Underlying Fund is a Fund-of-Fund Structure).
23. The investment objectives of the Balanced Pool, the Canadian Equity Pool and the Canadian Fixed Income Pool are set out in paragraphs 8 to 10 above.
24. The amounts invested from time to time in an Underlying Fund by a Top Fund may exceed 20% of the outstanding voting securities of any single Underlying Fund. Accordingly, each Top Fund could, either alone or together with the other Top Funds, become a substantial securityholder of an Underlying Fund. The Pooled Funds are, or will be, related mutual funds by virtue of the common management of the Pooled Funds by Invesco.
25. In the absence of the Related Issuer Relief, each Top Fund would be precluded from investing in an Underlying Fund due to the investment prohibitions in paragraph 111(2)(b) and subsection 111(3) of the Act.
26. Each investment by a Top Fund in an Underlying Fund represents the business judgment of responsible persons uninfluenced by considerations other than the best interests of the Pooled Funds.
Filing of Reports
27. In the absence of the Reporting Relief, Invesco would be required to file a report for every transaction between a Top Fund and an Underlying Fund under section 117(1)(a) of the Ontario Act.
Decision
In-Species Relief
The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.
The decision of the principal regulator is that the In-Species Relief is granted provided that in connection with each In-Specie Transaction between the Balanced Pool and the Canadian Fixed Income Pool, between the Balanced Pool and the Canadian Equity Pool, and between any other Pooled Funds managed by Invesco in respect of which the Filers act as registered advisers:
(a) where a Pooled Fund purchases units of another Pooled Fund:
(i) the Pooled Fund acquiring securities as payment, would be permitted to purchase the securities;
(ii) the securities are acceptable to the applicable Filer, as portfolio manager of the Pooled Fund, and consistent with the investment objective of the Pooled Fund acquiring the securities;
(iii) the value of the securities is at least equal to the issue price of the securities of the Pooled Fund for which they are payment, valued as if the securities were portfolio assets of that Pooled Fund; and
(iv) each Pooled Fund will keep written records of each In-Specie Transaction in a financial year of a Pooled Fund reflecting the details of securities delivered to the Pooled Fund and the value assigned to such securities, for a period of five years after the end of the fiscal year, the most recent two years in a reasonably accessible place;
(b) where a Pooled Fund redeems units of another Pooled Fund:
(i) the securities are acceptable to the applicable Filer as portfolio manager of the Pooled Fund which redeems units, and are consistent with the investment objective of that Pooled Fund;
(ii) the value of the securities is equal to the amount at which those securities were valued in calculating the net asset value per security used to establish the redemption price;
(iii) each Pooled Fund will keep written records of each In-Specie Transaction in a financial year of a Pooled Fund reflecting the details of securities delivered to the Pooled Fund and the value assigned to such securities, for a period of five years after the end of the fiscal year, the most recent two years in a reasonably accessible place; and
(c) the Filers do not receive any compensation in respect of any In-Specie Transaction and, in respect of any delivery of securities further to an In-Specie Transaction, the only charge paid by the Pooled Fund is the commission charged by the dealer executing the trade and/or any administrative charges levied by the custodian.
Reporting Relief and Related Issuer Relief
The principal regulator is satisfied that the decision meets the test set out in the Legislation for the principal regulator to make the decision.
The decision of the principal regulator is that the Reporting Relief is granted.
The decision of the principal regulator is that the Related Issuer Relief is granted provided that:
(a) units of a Top Fund are distributed in Canada solely pursuant to exemptions from the prospectus requirements in NI 45-106;
(b) the investment by a Top Fund in an Underlying Fund is compatible with the fundamental investment objectives of a Top Fund;
(c) no management fees or incentive fees are payable by a Top Fund that, to a reasonable person, would duplicate a fee payable by an Underlying Fund for the same service;
(d) no sales or redemption fees are payable by a Top Fund in relation to its purchases or redemptions of units of an Underlying Fund;
(e) the Filers will not vote the units of an Underlying Fund held by a Top Fund at any meeting of holders of such units;
(f) if available, the offering memorandum (or other similar document) of a Top Fund will disclose:
(i) that a Top Fund may purchase units of an Underlying Fund;
(ii) the fact that the Filers are the investment advisers to both the Top Funds and the Underlying Funds; and
(iii) the approximate or maximum percentage of net assets of the Top Fund that it is intended be invested in securities of the Underlying Fund.
SCHEDULE A
LIST OF EXISTING POOLED FUNDS
1. Invesco Core Canadian Fixed Income Pool (to be established on or about December 15, 2009)
2. Invesco Global Real Estate Pool
3. Invesco International Equity Fund
4. Invesco Structured Core U.S. Equity Fund
5. Trimark Balanced Pool (to be renamed Invesco Balanced Pool effective on or about December 16, 2009)
6. Trimark Canadian Equity Pool (to be renamed Invesco Canadian Equity Pool effective on or about December 16, 2009)
7. Trimark Global Equity Pool (to be renamed Invesco Global Equity Pool effective on or about December 16, 2009)
Irwin Boock et al. -- ss. 127, 127.1
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
IRWIN BOOCK, STANTON DEFREITAS, JASON
WONG, SAUDIA ALLIE, ALENA DUBINSKY,
ALEX KHODJIAINTS, SELECT AMERICAN
TRANSFER CO., LEASESMART, INC.,
ADVANCED GROWING SYSTEMS, INC.,
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY LTD., NUTRIONE
CORPORATION, POCKETOP CORPORATION,
ASIA TELECOM LTD., PHARM CONTROL LTD.,
CAMBRIDGE RESOURCES CORPORATION,
COMPUSHARE TRANSFER CORPORATION,
FEDERATED PURCHASER, INC.,
TCC INDUSTRIES, INC., FIRST NATIONAL
ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION,
WGI HOLDINGS, INC. AND ENERBRITE
TECHNOLOGIES GROUP
ORDER
(Section 127 and 127.1)
WHEREAS on October 16, 2008, the Commission commenced the within proceeding by issuing a Notice of Hearing pursuant to sections 127 and 127.1 of the Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended (the "Act");
AND WHEREAS the hearing was adjourned from time to time until April 22, 2009 when the Commission ordered that the hearing of this matter on the merits was to be held on Monday, October 19, 2009 through to Friday, November 13, 2009, excluding Wednesday, November 11, 2009, commencing each day at 10:00 a.m. at the offices of the Commission on the 17th floor, 20 Queen Street West in Toronto;
AND WHEREAS on October 14, 2009 counsel for Stanton DeFreitas ("DeFreitas") attended before the Commission and requested that the hearing scheduled to commence on October 19, 2009 be adjourned for the purpose of bringing a motion to obtain further disclosure from Staff of the Commission;
AND WHEREAS on October 14, 2009 counsel for Staff of the Commission attended as did counsel for Irwin Boock ("Boock") and counsel for Jason Wong ("Wong");
AND WHEREAS on October 14, 2009 none of the other Respondents attended before the Commission nor did counsel for any of the other Respondents;
AND WHEREAS on October 14, 2009 counsel for Staff of the Commission did not oppose the adjournment request of counsel for DeFreitas, nor did counsel for Boock or counsel for Wong;
AND WHEREAS the temporary orders made by the Commission on April 22, 2009 remain in place until the completion of the hearing on the merits of this matter;
AND WHEREAS on October 15th, 2009, the Commission ordered that the hearing of this matter on the merits which was to commence on Monday, October 19, 2009 be vacated and that the hearing be adjourned until December 1, 2009, or such other date as determined by the parties and the Secretary's office, for the purpose of setting dates for the hearing on the merits;
AND WHEREAS on November 30, 2009, the Commission ordered that the hearing be adjourned until December 10, 2009 to ascertain when to set dates for the hearing on the merits;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, counsel for Boock, DeFrietas, and Wong and counsel for Staff appeared before the Commission and made submissions regarding the scheduling of the hearing on the merits;
AND WHEREAS the Commission is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to make this Order;
IT IS ORDERED THAT the dates for the hearing of this matter on the merits shall commence on February 1, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. and shall continue for four weeks excluding the dates of February 2, 15 and 16 or such other dates as may be determined by the parties and the Office of the Secretary.
DATED at Toronto this 10th day of December, 2010.
"James E. A. Turner"
Gold-Quest International et al. -- ss. 127(1), 127(8)
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
GOLD-QUEST INTERNATIONAL,
HEALTH AND HARMONEY, IAIN BUCHANAN,
AND LISA BUCHANAN
ORDER
(Subsections 127(1) and (8) of the Securities Act)
WHEREAS on the 1st day of April, 2008, the Ontario Securities Commission (the "Commission") ordered, pursuant to clause 2 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended (the "Act") that all trading in any securities of Gold-Quest International ("Gold-Quest") shall cease (the "Temporary Order");
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 2 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that all trading in any securities by Health and HarMONEY, Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan (the "Ontario Respondents") shall cease;
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 3 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that any exemptions contained in Ontario securities law do not apply to Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents;
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 3 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that any exemptions contained in Ontario securities law do not apply to Gold-Quest's officers, directors, agents or employees;
AND WHEREAS on April 8, 2008, the Commission issued a Notice of Hearing in this matter (the "Notice of Hearing");
AND WHEREAS Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents were served with the Temporary Order, the Notice of Hearing and the Evidence Brief of Staff of the Commission ("Staff") as set out in the Affidavit of Service of Dale Grybauskas dated April 14, 2008;
AND WHEREAS no correspondence has ever been sent to Staff on behalf of Gold-Quest and no one has ever appeared for Gold-Quest;
AND WHEREAS upon hearing submissions from counsel for Staff and on written consent of counsel for the Ontario Respondents dated April 11, 2008, the Commission extended the Temporary Order until July 14, 2008 or until further order of the Commission, subject to a carve-out to permit Iain Buchanan to trade in securities listed on a recognized public exchange only in his own existing account(s), for his own benefit, and through a dealer registered with the Commission, and a carve-out to permit Lisa Buchanan to trade in securities listed on a recognized public exchange only in her own existing account(s), for her own benefit, and through a dealer registered with the Commission (the "Amended Temporary Order");
AND WHEREAS on May 6, 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") filed an emergency civil enforcement action against Gold-Quest, and U.S. District Court Judge Lloyd D. George issued numerous orders against Gold-Quest and persons related to Gold-Quest, including orders prohibiting the trading in securities of Gold-Quest, freezing assets related to the sale of Gold-Quest securities and appointing a permanent receiver for Gold-Quest;
AND WHEREAS on July 14, 2008, counsel for Staff attended before the Commission while counsel for the Ontario Respondents did not attend but provided correspondence with respect to the Temporary Order;
AND WHEREAS on July 14, 2008, upon hearing submissions from counsel for Staff and considering the correspondence from counsel for the Ontario Respondents, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until October 8, 2008 and the hearing was adjourned to October 7, 2008;
AND WHEREAS on October 7, 2008, counsel for Staff and counsel for the Ontario Respondents did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order;
AND WHEREAS on October 7, 2008, upon considering the correspondence from counsel for the Ontario Respondents, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until December 10, 2008 and the hearing was adjourned to December 9, 2008;
AND WHEREAS on December 9, 2008, counsel for Staff and counsel for the Ontario Respondents did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order;
AND WHEREAS on December 9, 2008, upon considering the correspondence from counsel for the Ontario Respondents, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until February 11, 2009 and the hearing was adjourned to February 10, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on February 10, 2009, counsel for Staff and counsel for the Ontario Respondents did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order;
AND WHEREAS on February 10, 2009, upon considering the correspondence from counsel for the Ontario Respondents, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until March 20, 2009 and the hearing was adjourned to March 20, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on March 12, 2009, Staff of the Commission issued a Statement of Allegations against Gold-Quest, the Ontario Respondents, the Harmoney Club Inc., and Sandra Gale alleging breaches of the Act related to trades in the securities of Gold-Quest and the Harmoney Club Inc.;
AND WHEREAS on March 20, 2009, upon considering the correspondence from counsel for the Ontario Respondents, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until May 27, 2009 and adjourned the hearing into the extension of the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until May 26, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on May 26, 2009, as no counsel appeared for Gold-Quest and Health and HarMONEY, and upon being informed that counsel for Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order until June 25, 2009, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until June 25, 2009 and adjourned the hearing into the extension of the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until June 25, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on June 25, 2009, as no counsel appeared for Gold-Quest and Health and HarMONEY and counsel for Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order until August 21, 2009, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until August 21, 2009 and adjourned the hearing regarding the extension of the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until August 20, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on August 20, 2009, no counsel appeared for Gold-Quest and Health and HarMONEY and counsel for Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order until October 13, 2009, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until October 13, 2009 and adjourned the hearing regarding the extension of the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until October 9, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on October 9, 2009, no counsel appeared for Gold-Quest and Health and HarMONEY and counsel for Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order until December 11, 2009, the Commission extended the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until December 11, 2009 and adjourned the hearing regarding the extension of the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents until December 10, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, counsel for Staff and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan attended before the Commission;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, no counsel appeared for Gold-Quest and Health and HarMONEY;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, counsel for Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan did not oppose the extension of the Amended Temporary Order until the end of the Hearing on the Merits;
AND WHEREAS it is in the public interest to extend the Amended Temporary Order;
IT IS ORDERED THAT the Amended Temporary Order against Gold-Quest and the Ontario Respondents is extended until the completion of the Hearing on the Merits.
DATED at Toronto this 10th day of December, 2009
"Carol S. Perry"
Gold-Quest International et al. -- s. 127
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
GOLD-QUEST INTERNATIONAL,
1725587 ONTARIO INC. carrying on business as
HEALTH AND HARMONEY, HARMONEY CLUB
INC., DONALD IAIN BUCHANAN, LISA
BUCHANAN AND SANDRA GALE
ORDER
(Subsections 127(1) and (8) of the Securities Act)
WHEREAS on April 1, 2008, the Ontario Securities Commission (the "Commission") ordered, pursuant to clause 2 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as amended (the "Act") that all trading in any securities of Gold-Quest International (.Gold-Quest.) shall cease (the "Temporary Order");
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 2 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that all trading in any securities by Health and HarMONEY, Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan shall cease;
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 3 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that any exemptions contained in Ontario securities law do not apply to Gold-Quest, Health and HarMONEY, Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan;
AND WHEREAS the Commission further ordered as part of the Temporary Order that pursuant to clause 3 of subsection 127(1) and subsection 127(5) of the Act that any exemptions contained in Ontario securities law do not apply to Gold-Quest.s officers, directors, agents or employees;
AND WHEREAS on April 8, 2008, the Commission issued a Notice of Hearing to consider among other things, the extension of Temporary Order (the "TCTO Hearing");
AND WHEREAS April 11, 2008 the Temporary Order was extended by the Commission with some amendments (the "Amended Temporary Order");
AND WHEREAS the Amended Temporary Order has been extended from time to time, most recently until August 21, 2009, and the TCTO Hearing has been adjourned from time to time most recently until August 20, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on March 13, 2009, the Commission issued a Notice of Hearing of pursuant to sections 127 and 127.1 of the Act (the "Hearing") accompanied by a Statement of Allegations dated March 12, 2009, issued by Staff of the Commission ("Staff") with respect to Gold-Quest, 1725587 Ontario Inc. carrying on business as Health and HarMONEY, the Harmoney Club, Donald Iain Buchanan, Lisa Buchanan and Sandra Gale;
AND WHEREAS on March 20, 2009, upon hearing submissions from Sandra Gale, counsel for Staff and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan, it was ordered that the Hearing be adjourned to May 26, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on May 26, 2009, upon hearing submissions from Sandra Gale, counsel for Staff and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan, it was ordered that the Hearing be adjourned to June 25, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on June 25, 2009, counsel for Staff, counsel for Sandra Gale and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan attended before the Commission;
AND WHEREAS on June 25, 2009, no one appeared for Gold-Quest, Health and HarMONEY, or the Harmoney Club;
AND WHEREAS on June 25, 2009, upon hearing submissions from counsel for Staff, counsel for Sandra Gale, and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan, it was ordered that the Hearing be adjourned to August 20, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on August 20, 2009, no one appeared for Gold-Quest, Health and HarMONEY, or the Harmoney Club;
AND WHEREAS on August 20, 2009, upon hearing submissions from counsel for Staff and counsel for Sandra Gale requesting that a pre-hearing conference be held on October 9, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on October 9, 2009, a pre-hearing conference was commenced and counsel for Staff, counsel for Sandra Gale and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan attended before the Commission;
AND WHEREAS on October 9, 2009, no one appeared for Gold-Quest, Health and HarMONEY, or the Harmoney Club;
AND WHEREAS on October 9, 2009, counsel for Staff, counsel for Sandra Gale and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan requested the pre-hearing conference be continued on December 10, 2009;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, counsel for Staff, Sandra Gale, counsel for Sandra Gale, and counsel for Donald Iain Buchanan and Lisa Buchanan continued the pre-hearing conference and made submissions to the Commission;
AND WHEREAS on December 10, 2009, counsel for Sandra Gale appeared before the Commission and brought a motion before the Commission for leave of the Commission to withdraw as counsel for Sandra Gale;
AND WHEREAS Staff advised that certain of the parties intend to file an agreed statement of facts prior to the commencement of the Hearing scheduled to commence on March 25, 2010 to consider sanctions and other related matters;
IT IS ORDERED THAT the Hearing is adjourned to March 25, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. for a full day and March 26, 2010 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m., or such other dates as are agreed to by the parties and determined by the Office of the Secretary, for the purpose of considering sanctions for certain of the Respondents and for any other purpose that the parties may advise the Office of the Secretary;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the motion for leave of the Commission to withdraw brought by counsel for Sandra Gale is granted and leave of the Commission is granted for counsel to withdraw.
DATED at Toronto this 10th day of December, 2009
"Carol S. Perry"
ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. -- s. 144
Headnote
Section 144 -- application for variation of cease trade order -- issuer cease traded due to failure to file with the Commission interim financial statements -- issuer has applied for a variation of the cease trade order to permit certain trades in connection with a reorganization under Section 191 of the Canada Business Corporations Act -- Proposal to the Applicant's unsecured creditors approved by the Superior Court of Quebec and the Applicant's unsecured creditors -- partial revocation granted subject to conditions.
Applicable Legislative Provisions
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am., ss. 127, 144.
National Policy 12-202 Revocation of a Compliance-related Cease Trade Order.
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990 C. S.5, AS AMENDED
(THE "ACT")
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC.
ORDER
(Section 144)
WHEREAS the securities of ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. (the "Applicant") are subject to a temporary cease trade order made by the Director dated November 26, 2009 under subsections 127(1) and 127(5) of the Act and as extended by a further cease trade order made by the Director dated December 8, 2009 under subsection 127(1) of the Act directing that trading in the securities of the Applicant cease unless revoked by a further order of revocation (the "Cease Trade Order");
AND WHEREAS the Applicant has applied to the Ontario Securities Commission (the "Commission") pursuant to section 144 of the Act (the "Application") for a partial revocation of the Cease Trade Order;
AND WHEREAS the Applicant has represented to the Commission that:
1. The Applicant was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act, R.S.C. (1985), c. C-44 (the "CBCA") on October 13, 2006. Its head office is located at 2300, Alfred Nobel Boulevard, Montreal, Québec, H4S 2A4.
2. The Applicant offers molecular imaging products for the medical and pharmaceutical sectors.
3. The Applicant's authorized share capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares and an unlimited number of preferred shares, issuable in series. Currently there are (i) 94,540,592 common shares, (ii) 6,341,982 series 1 convertible preferred shares, (iii) 2,000,000 series 2 convertible preferred shares, (iii) 7,008,868 series 3 convertible preferred shares, and (iv) 46,092,428 series 4 and series 5 convertible preferred shares issued and outstanding.
4. The Applicant is a reporting issuer in all provinces and territories of Canada.
5. The Applicant's common shares, series 1 convertible preferred shares and series 2 convertible preferred shares (collectively, the "Listed Securities") are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the "TSX").
6. The Continued Listing Committee of the TSX determined to delist the Listed Securities effective at the close of market on December 11, 2009. The delisting was imposed due to the failure by the Applicant to meet the continued listing requirements of the TSX, as detailed in Part VII of the TSX Company Manual.
7. To date, the Applicant has not generated sufficient revenues to offset its research and development costs and accordingly has not generated positive cash flows or an operating profit.
8. The Cease Trade Order was issued due to the default of the Applicant to file interim financial statements and interim management's discussion and analysis as prescribed by National Instrument 51-102 -- Continuous Disclosure Obligations for the period ended September 30, 2009 (together, the "Q3 Financials") within the prescribed deadline. No further financial statements or management's discussion and analysis have been filed by the Applicant since that time.
9. The Applicant's failure to file the Q3 Financials was a result of financial distress. The Applicant does not have the human and financial resources in order to prepare the Q3 Financials in anticipation of closing of the transactions contemplated by the Proposal and Reorganization (as defined below) (the "Closing").
10. In addition to the Cease Trade Order, the Applicant is subject to the following cease trade orders, each of which was issued due to the failure of the Applicant to file its Q3 Financials:
(a) order issued by the British Columbia Securities Commission on November 20, 2009;
(b) order issued by the Manitoba Securities Commission on November 26, 2009; and
(c) order issued by the Autorité des marchés financiers on December 4, 2009.
11. On November 2, 2009, facing a serious cashflow crisis, the Applicant filed a notice of intention to make a proposal pursuant to Section 50.4 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (the "BIA").
12. KPMG Inc. was appointed trustee in respect of the Proposal (the "Trustee").
13. On October 18, 2009, KPMG Corporate Finance ("KPMG") was mandated by the Applicant to carry out a review of the Applicant's strategic options which included a recapitalization, the potential divestiture of some or all of the assets of the business, or a merger.
14. Following a sale process conducted by KPMG, the Applicant entered into a binding term sheet with Dorsky Worldwide Corp. ("Dorsky") on November 20, 2009. The binding term sheet was amended and restated on December 7, 2009 (the "Dorsky Offer").
15. The board of directors of the Applicant has unanimously determined that accepting the Dorsky Offer is in the best interests of the Applicant.
16. The Dorsky Offer provides for, inter alia:
(a) the transfer of all of the intellectual property assets of the Applicant, including trade-marks, patents and intellectual property licences, to Dorsky or its assignee free and clear of any liens or encumbrances;
(b) a restructuring of the Applicant implemented by way of a proposal to the Applicant's unsecured creditors under Section 58 of the BIA and a reorganization under Section 191 of the CBCA (the "Reorganization");
(c) a payment by Dorsky to the Trustee in the aggregate amount of $375,000.00 to be used by the Applicant to fund a distribution to its unsecured creditors;
(d) the payment or settlement of secured claims in accordance with the agreements to be entered into between the Applicant and its secured creditors;
(e) the payment by the Applicant of all amounts owing to the employees as at closing of the transaction in respect of vacation wages; and
(f) the release of the charge created pursuant to any and all security interests granted by the Applicant in favour of the Applicant's secured creditors.
17. Further to the execution of the Dorsky Offer, the Applicant filed a proposal for its creditors on November 23, 2009 and filed an amended proposal for its creditors on December 7, 2009 (the "Proposal"). The Trustee recommended the approval of the Proposal.
18. The Dorsky Offer and the transactions contemplated under the Dorsky Offer are conditional upon, inter alia, the approval of the proposal by the Applicant's unsecured creditors in accordance with the provisions of the BIA and by the Superior Court of Quebec (the "Court").
19. On December 7, 2009, the meeting of unsecured creditors was held and the unsecured creditors voted unanimously in favour of the Proposal. The Proposal was approved by the Court on December 9, 2009.
20. The implementation of the Proposal is subject to certain other conditions precedent, including, inter alia, approval by the Court of the articles of reorganization (the "Articles of Reorganization") of the Applicant to be filed with the Director pursuant to Section 191 of the CBCA, and the issuance of a certificate of amendment by the Director appointed under Section 260 of the CBCA reflecting the Articles of Reorganization, providing for:
(a) the addition to the terms of each class or series of common or preferred shares of the Applicant of a provision providing for the automatic redemption and cancellation at Closing of all outstanding shares of any class or series and of all rights related to them, without payment or consideration or any other right (the "Outstanding Shares Cancellation"); and
(b) the creation of a new class of voting common shares of the Applicant (the "Voting Common Shares") to be created pursuant to the Articles of Reorganization with the terms and conditions set forth in the Articles of Reorganization and issued to Dorsky at Closing, representing 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Applicant following Closing (the "Dorsky Issuance").
21. The Outstanding Shares Cancellation will result in the holders of the existing shares and equity of the Applicant not receiving any payment or other compensation with respect to such shares and equity. Upon the implementation of the Proposal and Reorganization, all such shares and equity will be automatically cancelled, without any vote or approval by, or payment to, the holders of such shares and equity.
22. In a press release dated November 20, 2009, the Applicant announced that holders of the existing equity of the Applicant will not receive any payment or other compensation with respect to such equity.
23. If the Proposal is implemented, Dorsky will be the sole shareholder of the Applicant. Dorsky is a private company controlled by Mr. Serge Huot and Société Paulista Consulting Group. Dorsky and its shareholders are not related parties of the Applicant and its shareholders.
24. If the Proposal is not implemented, the Applicant will become bankrupt. Under a bankruptcy scenario, taking into consideration the amounts owed to the secured creditors and the specialized nature of the assets and consequently their limited value under a liquidation scenario, the preferred and the unsecured creditors would likely receive nothing.
25. As the Proposal and Reorganization will involve trades in securities of the Applicant (including, for greater certainty, acts in furtherance of trades in securities of the Applicant), the Proposal and Reorganization cannot be completed without a variation of the Cease Trade Order.
26. The Proposal and Reorganization will be completed in accordance with all applicable laws.
27. Prior to the completion of the Proposal and Reorganization, Dorsky:
(a) will receive a copy of the Cease Trade Order;
(b) will receive a copy of this Order; and
(c) will receive a written notice from the Applicant, and will provide written acknowledgement to the Applicant, that all of the Applicant's securities, including the Voting Common Shares to be issued in connection with the Proposal and Reorganization, will remain subject to the Cease Trade Order until it is revoked and that the granting of this Order does not guarantee the issuance of a full revocation order in the future.
28. Following completion of the Reorganization, the Applicant intends to apply for a full revocation of the Cease Trade Order and an order that the Applicant is not a reporting issuer in each jurisdiction in which it is currently a reporting issuer.
29. The Applicant is not in default of any requirements of the Cease Trade Order or the Act or the rules and regulations made pursuant thereto, subject to the deficiencies that led to the issuance of the Cease Trade Order.
AND WHEREAS considering the Application and the recommendation of the staff of the Commission;
AND WHEREAS the Director being satisfied that to do so would not be prejudicial to the public interest;
IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 144 of the Act, that the Cease Trade Order is partially revoked solely to permit trades in securities of the Applicant in connection with the Reorganization as described in paragraph 20 and all other acts in furtherance of the Reorganization that may be considered to fall within the definition of "trade" within the meaning of the Act, provided that:
(a) prior to the completion of the Proposal and Reorganization, Dorsky:
(i) receives a copy of the Cease Trade Order;
(ii) receives a copy of this Order; and
(iii) receives a written notice from the Applicant, and provides a written acknowledgement to the Applicant, that all of the Applicant's securities, including the Voting Common Shares to be issued in connection with the Proposal and Reorganization, will remain subject to the Cease Trade Order until it is revoked, and that the granting of this Order does not guarantee the issuance of a full revocation order in the future; and
(b) the Applicant undertakes to make available copies of the written acknowledgments to staff of the Commission on request.
DATED December 11, 2009.
JovInvestment Management Inc. and ProShare Advisors LLC -- ss. 78(1), 80 of the CFA
Section 80 of the Commodity Futures Act (Ontario) -- Relief from the adviser registration requirements of subsection 22(1)(b) of the CFA granted to sub-adviser not ordinarily resident in Ontario in respect of advice regarding trades in commodity futures contracts and commodity futures options, subject to certain terms and conditions. Relief mirrors exemption available in section 7.3 of OSC Rule 35-502 -- Non-Resident Advisers (Rule 35-502) made under the Securities Act (Ontario).
Statutes Cited
Commodity Futures Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.20, as am., ss. 22(1)(b), 78, 80.
Securities Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, as am. -- Rule 35-502 -- Non Resident Advisers.
IN THE MATTER OF
THE COMMODITY FUTURES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.20, AS AMENDED
(the CFA)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
JOVINVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC.
AND
PROSHARE ADVISORS LLC
ORDER
(Section 78(1) and Section 80 of the CFA)
UPON the application (the Application) of JovInvestment Management Inc. (the Principal Adviser) and ProShare Advisors LLC (the Sub-Adviser) to the Ontario Securities Commission (the Commission) for an order:
(a) pursuant to section 78(1) of the CFA, revoking the exemption order granted by the Commission to the Sub-Adviser on December 15, 2006; and
(b) pursuant to section 80 of the CFA, that the Sub-Adviser be exempt, for a period of five years, from the adviser registration requirement in paragraph 22(1)(b) of the CFA when acting as an adviser for the Principal Adviser in respect of its Clients(as defined below) regarding commodity futures contracts and commodity futures options traded on commodity futures exchanges (collectively, the Commodity Instruments) and cleared through clearing corporations.
AND UPON considering the Application and the recommendations of staff of the Commission;
AND UPON the Sub-Adviser and the Principal Adviser having represented to the Commission that:
The Parties
1. The Principal Adviser is a corporation incorporated under the laws of Ontario and its principal business office is located in Toronto, Ontario.
2. The Principal Adviser is currently registered as:
(a) an adviser in the category of portfolio manager under the Securities Act (Ontario) (the Act); and
(b) as a commodity trading counsel and as a commodity trading manager under the CFA.
3. The Sub-Adviser is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, United States. The head office of the Sub-Adviser is located in Bethesda, Maryland.
4. The Sub-Adviser is registered as an investment adviser in the United States with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Clients
5. The Principal Adviser provides portfolio management services to its clients in Ontario including mutual funds and other investment vehicles (individually each Client, collectively, the Clients).
6. The Principal Adviser, pursuant to a written agreement with each Client:
(a) acts as an adviser in respect of trading securities and Commodity Instruments; and
(b) exercises discretionary authority in respect of the investment portfolio of each Client for the purchase and sale of securities and Commodity Instruments.
7. In connection with the Principal Adviser acting as an adviser to each Client in respect of the purchase or sale of Commodity Instruments, the Principal Adviser may, from time to time, pursuant to a written agreement made between the Principal Adviser and the Sub-Adviser, retain the Sub-Adviser to act as an adviser to it (the Proposed Advisory Services) by exercising discretionary authority on behalf of the Principal Adviser, in respect of the investment portfolio of each Client, including discretionary authority to buy or sell Commodity Instruments for the Client, provided that:
(a) in each case, the Commodity Instruments must be cleared through an acceptable clearing corporation; and
(b) such investments are consistent with the investment objectives and strategies of each Client.
8. Paragraph 22(1)(b) of the CFA prohibits a person or company from acting as an adviser unless the person or company is registered as an adviser under the CFA, or is registered as a partner or an officer of a registered adviser and is acting on behalf of a registered adviser. Under the CFA "adviser" means a person or company engaging in or holding himself, herself or itself out as engaging in the business of advising others as to trading in "contracts", and "contracts" means commodity futures contracts and commodity futures options.
9. By providing the Proposed Advisory Services, the Sub-Adviser will be acting as an adviser with respect to Commodity Instruments, and in the absence of being granted the requested relief, would be required to register as an adviser under the CFA.
10. There is presently no rule or other regulation under the CFA that provides an exemption from the adviser registration requirement in paragraph 22(1)(b) of the CFA for a person or company acting as an adviser in respect of Commodity Instruments that is similar to the exemption from the adviser registration requirement of paragraph 25(1)(c) of the Act for acting as an adviser (as defined in the Act) in respect of securities that is provided under section 7.3 of OSC Rule 35-502 Non Resident Advisers (OSC Rule 35-502).
11. The relationship among the Principal Adviser, the Sub-Adviser and the Clients will satisfy the requirements of section 7.3 of Rule 35-502.
12. As would be required under section 7.3 of OSC Rule 35-502 :
(a) the duties and obligations of the Sub-Adviser will be set out in a written agreement with the Principal Adviser;
(b) The Principal Adviser will contractually agree with each Client to be responsible for any loss that arises out of the failure of the Sub-Adviser:
(i) to exercise the powers and discharge the duties of its office honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Principal Adviser and the Clients; or
(ii) to exercise the degree of care, diligence and skill that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in the circumstances (together with (i), the Assumed Obligations); and
(c) the Principal Adviser cannot be relieved by the Clients from its responsibility for any loss that arises out of the failure of the Sub-Adviser to meet the Assumed Obligations.
13. The Sub-Adviser is not a resident of any province or territory of Canada.
14. The Sub-Adviser is appropriately registered or licensed, or is entitled to rely on appropriate exemptions from such registrations or licences, to provide advice to the Clients pursuant to the applicable legislation of the Sub-Adviser's principal jurisdictions.
15. The Sub-Adviser will only provide the Proposed Advisory Services so long as the Principal Adviser is, and remains registered under the CFA as a commodity trading counsel and as a commodity trading manager under the CFA.
16. Prior to purchasing any Commodity Instruments for Clients that reside in Ontario, each Client will receive written disclosure that includes:
(a) a statement that the Principal Adviser is responsible for any loss that arises out of the failure of the Sub-Adviser to meet the Assumed Obligations; and
(b) a statement that there may be difficulty in enforcing any legal rights against the Sub-Adviser (or the individual representatives of the Sub-Adviser) advising the relevant Client, because such entity is resident outside of Canada and all or substantially all of its assets are situated outside of Canada.
17. Pursuant to an order of the Commission dated December 15, 2006, reported at Re ProShare Advisors LLC (2006), 29 OSCB 10002 (the Previous Order), the Commission granted the Sub-Adviser an exemption from the adviser registration requirement in paragraph 22(1)(b) of the CFA in respect of advice regarding trades in Commodity Instruments provided on a sub-advisory basis to the Principal Adviser (formerly known, as Jove Investment Management Inc.), subject to certain terms and conditions. The Previous Order is scheduled to expire on December 15, 2009.
AND UPON the Commission being satisfied that it would not be prejudicial to the public interest for the Commission to grant the exemption requested on the basis of the terms and conditions proposed;
IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to section 78(1) of the CFA, that the Previous Order is revoked; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to section 80 of the CFA that the Sub-Adviser is exempted from the adviser registration requirement of paragraph 22(1)(b) of the CFA, in respect of the Proposed Advisory Services provided to the Principal Adviser for a period of five years, provided that at the relevant time that such activities are engaged in:
(a) the Principal Adviser is registered under the CFA as a commodity trading counsel and a commodity trading manager;
(b) the Sub-Adviser is appropriately registered or licensed, or is entitled to rely on appropriate exemptions from such registrations or licences, to provide advice to the Principal Adviser relating to Commodity Instruments pursuant to the applicable legislation of its principal jurisdiction;
(c) the duties and obligations of the Sub-Adviser are set out in a written agreement with the Principal Adviser;
(d) the Principal Adviser has contractually agreed with each Client to be responsible for any loss that arises out of any failure of the Sub-Adviser to meet the Assumed Obligations;
(e) the Principal Adviser cannot be relieved by the Clients from its responsibility for any loss that arises out of the failure of the Sub Adviser to meet the Assumed Obligations; and
(f) prior to purchasing any Commodity Instruments for Clients in Ontario, each Client will receive written disclosure that includes:
(i) a statement that the Principal Adviser is responsible for any loss that arises out of the failure of the Sub-Adviser to meet the Assumed Obligations; and
(ii) a statement that there may be difficulty in enforcing any legal rights against the Sub-Adviser (or the individual representatives of the Sub-Adviser) advising the relevant Client, because such entity is resident outside of Canada and all or substantially all of its assets are situated outside of Canada.
December 11, 2009
Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership et al.
IN THE MATTER OF
THE SECURITIES ACT,
R.S.O. 1990, C. S.5, AS AMENDED
AND
IN THE MATTER OF
OVERSEA CHINESE FUND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP, WEIZHEN TANG AND
ASSOCIATES INC., WEIZHEN TANG CORP.
AND WEIZHEN TANG
DECISION
Hearing: |
November 13, 2009 |
||
Decision: |
December 10, 2009 |
||
Panel: |
James E. A. Turner |
-- |
Vice-Chair and Chair of the Panel |
David L. Knight, FCA |
-- |
Commissioner |
|
Counsel: |
Hugh Craig |
-- |
For the Ontario Securities Commission |
Matthew Boswell |
|||
Loftus J. Cuddy |
-- |
For Oversea Chinese Fund Limited Partnership, |
|
Weizhen Tang and Associates Inc., Weizhen Tang Corp. |
|||
and Weizhen Tang |
|||
DECISION
[1] This is an application to permit Mr. Weizhen Tang to trade in foreign currencies, under the supervision of a portfolio manager yet to be identified, on his own behalf and on behalf of forty-two investors in Oversea Chinese Fund, LP ("Oversea") who have signed consents requesting that the Commission permit Mr. Tang to do so. We note that there are other investors opposed to permitting Mr. Tang to trade.
[2] Staff asks the Commission to extend the temporary cease trade order issued in this matter (the "Temporary Cease Trade Order") until the completion of a related criminal proceeding that is currently scheduled to begin on April 12, 2010, in the Ontario Court of Justice.
[3] Upon considering the evidence and submissions of the parties, we gave an oral ruling and issued an order extending the Temporary Cease Trade Order.
[4] The allegations against Mr. Tang in this matter are very serious. He has acknowledged to Staff that:
(i) he failed to disclose investment losses to investors;
(ii) he created misleading and untrue investor account statements reflecting significantly inflated investment values;
(iii) he made statements in which he significantly inflated the value of Oversea's assets under management; and
(iv) all invested funds have been dissipated such that no money is left.
[5] Staff alleges that Mr. Tang has made representations through his website that are untrue.
[6] Staff alleges that Oversea is a "Ponzi scheme" and that investor redemptions were paid from the investments made by others. It appears that as much as $30 million has been lost by investors as a result of Mr. Tang's activities.
[7] While these allegations by Staff have not yet been proven, they are very serious and a number of them have been admitted by Mr. Tang.
[8] We find that Mr. Tang has not met the onus on him to provide satisfactory information to Staff that would refute the allegations against him. To the contrary, he has admitted a number of very serious allegations.
[9] We are very sympathetic to the plight of investors who appear to have lost their entire investment in Oversea. We certainly understand why investors would hope to recoup some of that loss. If investors wish to invest further, there are ways for them to do so other than through Mr. Tang.
[10] Where there is credible evidence of serious harm to investors and our capital markets, the Commission must act to prevent further harm to existing or new investors.
[11] The order requested by Mr. Tang would permit him to continue to trade without registration in breach of the Act. It would allow Mr. Tang to accept more money from investors. It would permit him to potentially cause further harm to investors and to the integrity of capital markets. We cannot permit the risk of that occurring.
[12] Not only has Mr. Tang failed to satisfy us that the Temporary Cease Trade Order should be varied, but his affidavit filed in support of his motion and the investor authorizations he relies on assist us in concluding that we must continue the Temporary Cease Trade Order to protect the public interest.
[13] Accordingly, Mr. Tang's application was dismissed. The Temporary Cease Trade Order was extended to June 30, 2010. This matter shall return before the Commission at 10:00 a.m. on June 29, 2010.
DATED AT Toronto this 10th day of December, 2009.
"James E. A. Turner"
"David L. Knight"
Temporary, Permanent & Rescinding Issuer Cease Trading Orders
Company Name |
Date of Temporary Order |
Date of Hearing |
Date of Permanent Order |
Date of Lapse/Revoke |
|
||||
AAER Inc. |
04 Dec 09 |
16 Dec 09 |
18 Dec 09 |
|
|
||||
Production Enhancement Group Inc. |
10 Dec 09 |
22 Dec 09 |
||
|
||||
The Jenex Corporation |
14 Dec 09 |
24 Dec 09 |
||
Temporary, Permanent & Rescinding Management Cease Trading Orders
Company Name |
Date of Order or Temporary Order |
Date of Hearing |
Date of Permanent Order |
Date of Lapse/ Expire |
Date of Issuer Temporary Order |
|
|||||
THERE ARE NO ITEMS FOR THIS WEEK.
Outstanding Management & Insider Cease Trading Orders
Company Name |
Date of Order or Temporary Order |
Date of Hearing |
Date of Permanent Order |
Date of Lapse/ Expire |
Date of Issuer Temporary Order |
|
|||||
Sprylogics International Corp. |
02 June 09 |
15 June 09 |
15 June 09 |
||
|
|||||
Coalcorp Mining Inc. |
07 Oct 09 |
19 Oct 09 |
19 Oct 09 |
||
|
|||||
Garrison International Ltd. |
29 Oct 09 |
10 Nov 09 |
10 Nov 09 |
||
|
|||||
Toxin Alert Inc. |
06 Nov 09 |
18 Nov 09 |
18 Nov 09 |
||
CSA Notice of Technical Corrections to Amendments to NI 23-101 Trading Rules
CANADIAN SECURITIES ADMINISTRATORS
NOTICE OF TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO AMENDMENTS TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 23-101 TRADING RULES
I. INTRODUCTION
The Canadian Securities Administrators (the CSA or we) published on November 13, 2009 amendments (November 13 Amendments) to the following instruments:
1. National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation and related Companion Policy 21-101CP; and
2. National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules (NI 23-101) and related Companion Policy 23-101CP (23-101 CP)
The key part of the November 13 Amendments introduces a framework to require all visible, immediately accessible, better-priced limit orders to be filled before other limit orders at inferior prices, regardless of the marketplace where the order is entered (Order Protection Rule). Other parts of the November 13 Amendments include a prohibition on market participants intentionally entering an order that locks or crosses the market.
II. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS
The technical corrections are to the provisions in NI 23-101 and 23-101CP concerning locked and crossed orders (Locked and Crossed Order Provisions). The provisions prohibit a marketplace participant from intentionally locking or crossing a market by entering a protected order to buy a security at the same price or higher than the best protected offer or entering a protected order to sell a security at the same price or lower than the best protected bid.
The CSA intended to have the Locked and Crossed Order Provisions come into force on January 28, 2010. However, the November 13 Amendments contain a drafting error that does not implement this intention. Consequently, we have corrected this drafting error. As well, certain definitions in NI 23-101 and 23-101CP found in the November 13 Amendments will also be in force on January 28, 2010. The revised amendments are in Appendix A to this Notice.
There is no impact on the implementation date of the Order Protection Rule which remains February 1, 2011.
In Ontario, this corrected version of the Amendments was delivered by the Ontario Securities Commission to the Minister of Finance for approval on Monday, December 14, 2009.
III. QUESTIONS
Questions may be referred to any of:
Tracey Stern |
Sonali GuptaBhaya |
Ontario Securities Commission |
Ontario Securities Commission |
(416) 593-8167 |
(416) 593-2331 |
Elaine Lanouette |
Meg Tassie |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
British Columbia Securities Commission |
(514) 395-0337 ext.4356 |
(604) 899-6819 |
Serge Boisvert |
Doug Brown |
Autorité des marchés financiers |
Manitoba Securities Commission |
(514) 395-0337 ext.4358 |
(204) 945-0605 |
Lorenz Berner |
|
Alberta Securities Commission |
|
(403) 355-3889 |
|
December 18, 2009
APPENDIX A
AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 21-101 MARKETPLACE OPERATION
1.1 Amendments
(1) This Instrument amends National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation.
(2) The definitions in section 1.1 are amended as follows:
(a) the definition of "IDA" is repealed and replaced by the following "IIROC" means the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada";
(b) the definition of "inter-dealer bond broker" is amended by:
(i) striking out "IDA" and substituting "IIROC";
(ii) striking out "By-law No. 36" and substituting "Rule 36"; and
(iii) striking out "Regulation 2100" and substituting "Rule 2100";
(c) the definition of "recognized exchange" by repealing and replacing paragraph (b) and substituting with the following:
"(b) in Québec, an exchange recognized by the securities regulatory authority under securities or derivatives legislation as an exchange or self-regulatory organization"; and
(d) the definition of "recognized quotation and trade reporting system" is amended by
(i) adding "and Québec" between "British Columbia" and ", a quotation and trade reporting system" in paragraph (a);
(ii) striking out "and" at the end of paragraph (a) and adding "and" at the end of paragraph (b); and
(iii) adding the following:
"(c) in Québec, a quotation and trade reporting system recognized by the securities regulatory authority under securities or derivatives legislation as an exchange or a self-regulatory organization";
(3) The following subsection is added to section 1.4:
"(3) In Québec, the term "security", when used in this Instrument, includes a standardized derivative as this notion is defined in the Derivatives Act.".
(4) Part 10 is amended by:
(a) striking out "Disclosure of" in the title of Part 10; and
(b) adding the following section after section 10.2:
"10.3 Discriminatory Terms -- With respect to the execution of an order, a marketplace shall not impose terms that have the effect of discriminating between orders that are routed to that marketplace and orders that are entered on that marketplace.".
(5)
(a) Subsection 11.5(1) is amended by:
(i) adding "and" between "securities," and "a dealer";
(ii) striking out "and a regulation services provider monitoring the activities of marketplaces trading those securities"; and
(iii) adding "with the clock used by a regulation services provider monitoring the activities of marketplaces and marketplace participants trading those securities." at the end of the sentence; and
(b) subsection 11.5(2) is amended by:
(i) adding "and" between "securities," and "an inter-dealer bond broker";
(ii) striking out "and a regulation services provider monitoring the activities of marketplaces, inter-dealer bond brokers or dealers trading those securities"; and
(iii) adding "with the clock used by a regulation services provider monitoring the activities of marketplaces, inter-dealer bond brokers or dealers trading those securities." at the end of the sentence.
(6) Part 12 is repealed and replaced with the following:
"PART 12 CAPACITY, INTEGRITY AND SECURITY OF MARKETPLACE SYSTEMS
12.1 System Requirements -- For each of its systems that support order entry, order routing, execution, trade reporting, trade comparison, data feeds, market surveillance and trade clearing, a marketplace shall
(a) develop and maintain
(i) reasonable business continuity and disaster recovery plans;
(ii) an adequate system of internal control over those systems; and
(iii) adequate information technology general controls, including without limitation, controls relating to information systems operations, information security, change management, problem management, network support and system software support;
(b) in accordance with prudent business practice, on a reasonably frequent basis and, in any event, at least annually,
(i) make reasonable current and future capacity estimates;
(ii) conduct capacity stress tests to determine the ability of those systems to process transactions in an accurate, timely and efficient manner; and
(iii) test its business continuity and disaster recovery plans; and
(c) promptly notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority and, if applicable, its regulation services provider, of any material systems failure, malfunction or delay.
12.2 System Reviews --
(1) For each of its systems that support order entry, order routing, execution, trade reporting, trade comparison, data feeds, market surveillance and trade clearing, a marketplace shall annually engage a qualified party to conduct an independent systems review and prepare a report in accordance with established audit standards to ensure that it is in compliance with paragraph 12.1(a).
(2) A marketplace shall provide the report resulting from the review conducted under subsection (1) to
(a) its board of directors, or audit committee, promptly upon the report's completion, and
(b) the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, within 30 days of providing the report to its board of directors or the audit committee.
12.3 Availability of Technology Requirements and Testing Facilities --
(1) A marketplace shall make publicly available all technology requirements regarding interfacing with or accessing the marketplace in their final form,
(a) if operations have not begun, for at least three months immediately before operations begin; and
(b) if operations have begun, for at least three months before implementing a material change to its technology requirements.
(2) After complying with subsection (1), a marketplace shall make available testing facilities for interfacing with or accessing the marketplace,
(a) if operations have not begun, for at least two months immediately before operations begin; and
(b) if operations have begun, for at least two months before implementing a material change to its technology requirements.
(3) A marketplace shall not begin operations until it has complied with paragraphs (1)(a) and (2)(a).
(4) Subsections 12.3(1)(b) and (2)(b) do not apply to a marketplace if the change must be made immediately to address a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment if
(a) the marketplace immediately notifies the regulator, or in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, and, if applicable, its regulation services provider of its intention to make the change; and
(b) the marketplace publishes the changed technology requirements as soon as practicable.".
(7) Section 14.5 is repealed and replaced with the following:
"14.5 System Requirements -- An information processor shall
(a) develop and maintain
(i) reasonable business continuity and disaster recovery plans;
(ii) an adequate system of internal controls over its critical systems; and
(iii) adequate information technology general controls, including, without limitation, controls relating to information systems operations, information security, change management, problem management, network support, and system software support;
(b) in accordance with prudent business practice, on a reasonably frequent basis and in any event, at least annually,
(i) make reasonable current and future capacity estimates for each of its systems;
(ii) conduct capacity stress tests of its critical systems to determine the ability of those systems to process information in an accurate, timely and efficient manner; and
(iii) test its business continuity and disaster recovery plans;
(c) annually engage a qualified party to conduct an independent systems review and prepare a report in accordance with established audit standards to ensure that it is in compliance with paragraph (a);
(d) provide the report resulting from the review conducted under paragraph (c) to
(i) its board of directors or the audit committee promptly upon the report's completion, and
(ii) the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, within 30 days of providing it to the board of directors or the audit committee; and
(e) promptly notify the following of any failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment
(i) the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority; and
(ii) any regulation services provider, recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system monitoring trading of the securities about which information is provided to the information processor.".
1.2 Effective Date -- This Instrument comes into force on January 28, 2010.
AMENDMENTS TO COMPANION POLICY 21-101CP -- To National Instrument 21-101 Marketplace Operation
1.1 Amendments
(1) This instrument amends Companion Policy 21-101CP.
(2) Part 1 is amended by adding the following section as section 1.4:
"1.4 Definition of Regulation Services Provider -- The definition of regulation services provider is meant to capture a third party provider that provides regulation services to marketplaces. A recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system would not be a regulation services provider if it only conducts these regulatory services for its own marketplace or an affiliated marketplace.".
(3) Subsection 2.1(7) is amended by:
(a) striking out all references to the "IDA" and substituting "IIROC"; and
(b) striking out all references to "By-law No. 36" and substituting "Rule 36"; and
(c) striking out all references to "Regulation 2100" and substituting "Rule 2100".
(4) Subsection 3.4(5) is amended by striking out the reference to the "IDA" and substituting "IIROC".
(5) Subsection 6.1(6) is amended by striking out "any change to the operating platform of an ATS, the types of securities traded, or the types of subscribers." and substituting "a change to the information in Exhibits A, B, C, F, G, I, and J of Form 21-101F2.".
(6) Section 7.1 is repealed and replaced by the following:
"7.1 Access Requirements --
(1) Section 5.1 of the Instrument sets out access requirements that apply to a recognized exchange and a recognized quotation and trade reporting system. The Canadian securities regulatory authorities note that the requirements regarding access for members do not restrict the authority of a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system to maintain reasonable standards for access. The purpose of these access requirements is to ensure that rules, policies, procedures, fees and practices of the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system do not unreasonably create barriers to access to the services provided by the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system.".
(7) Section 7.1 is amended by adding the following after subsection (1):
"(2) For the purposes of complying with the order protection requirements in Part 6 of NI 23-101, a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system should permit fair and efficient access to
(a) a member or user that directly accesses the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system,
(b) a person or company that is indirectly accessing the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system through a member or user, or
(c) a marketplace routing an order to the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system.
The reference to "a person or company" in subsection (b) includes a system or facility that is operated by a person or company and a person or company that obtains access through a member or user.
(3) The reference to "services" in paragraph 5.1(b) of the Instrument means all services that may be offered to a person or company and includes all services relating to order entry, trading, execution, routing and data.
(4) Recognized exchanges and recognized quotation and trade reporting systems are responsible for ensuring that the fees they set are in compliance with section 5.1 of the Instrument. In assessing whether its fees unreasonably condition or limit access to its services, a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system should consider a number of factors, including
(a) the value of the security traded,
(b) the amount of the fee relative to the value of the security traded,
(c) the amount of fees charged by other marketplaces to execute trades in the market,
(d) with respect to market data fees, the amount of market data fees charged relative to the market share of the exchange or quotation and trade reporting system, and,
(e) with respect to order-execution terms, including fees, whether the outcome of their application is consistent with the policy goals of order protection.
The Canadian securities regulatory authorities will consider these factors, among others, in determining whether the fees charged by a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system unreasonably condition or limit access to its services. With respect to trading fees, our view is that a trading fee equal to or greater than the minimum trading increment as defined in IIROC's Universal Market Integrity Rules, as amended, would unreasonably condition or limit access to a recognized exchange's or recognized quotation and trade reporting system's services as it would be inconsistent with the policy goals of order protection. Trading fees below the minimum trading increment may also unreasonably condition or limit access to a recognized exchange's or recognized quotation and trade reporting system's services when taking into account factors including those listed above.".
(8) Section 8.2 is repealed and replaced by the following:
"8.2 Access Requirements --
(1) Section 6.13 of the Instrument sets out access requirements that apply to an ATS. The Canadian securities regulatory authorities note that the requirements regarding access do not prevent an ATS from setting reasonable standards for access. The purpose of these access requirements is to ensure that the policies, procedures, fees and practices of the ATS do not unreasonably create barriers to access to the services provided by the ATS.".
(9) Section 8.2 is amended by adding the following:
"(2) For the purposes of complying with the order protection requirements in Part 6 of NI 23-101, an ATS should permit fair and efficient access to
(a) a subscriber that directly accesses the ATS,
(b) a person or company that is indirectly accessing the ATS through a subscriber, or
(c) a marketplace routing an order to the ATS.
In addition, the reference to "a person or company" in subsection (b) includes a system or facility that is operated by a person or company and a person or company that obtains access through a subscriber that is a dealer.
(3) The reference to "services" in paragraph 6.13(b) of the Instrument means all services that may be offered to a person or company and includes all services related to order entry, trading, execution, routing and data.
(4) ATSs are responsible for ensuring that the fees they set are in compliance with section 6.13 of the Instrument. In assessing whether its fees unreasonably condition or limit access to its services, an ATS should consider a number of factors, including
(a) the value of the security traded,
(b) the amount of the fee relative to the value of the security traded,
(c) the amount of fees charged by other marketplaces to execute trades in the market,
(d) with respect to market data fees, the amount of market data fees charged relative to the market share of the ATS, and,
(e) with respect to order-execution terms, including fees, whether the outcome of their application is consistent with the policy goals of order protection.
The Canadian securities regulatory authorities will consider these factors, among others, in determining whether the fees charged by an ATS unreasonably condition or limit access to its services. With respect to trading fees, our view is that a trading fee equal to or greater than the minimum trading increment as defined in IIROC's Universal Market Integrity Rules, as amended, would unreasonably condition or limit access to an ATS's services as it would be inconsistent with the policy goals of order protection. Trading fees below the minimum trading increment may also unreasonably condition or limit access to an ATS's services when taking into account factors including those listed above.".
(10) Part 9 is amended by:
(a) striking out the first two sentences of subsection 9.1(1) and substituting the following:
"(1) Subsection 7.1(1) of the Instrument requires a marketplace that displays orders of exchange-traded securities to any person or company to provide accurate and timely information regarding those orders to an information processor or, if there is no information processor, to an information vendor that meets the standards set by a regulation services provider. Section 7.2 requires a marketplace to provide accurate and timely information regarding trades of exchange-traded securities to an information processor or, if there is no information processor, an information vendor that meets the standards set by a regulation services provider."; and
(b) repealing and replacing subsection 9.1(2) with the following:
"(2) In complying with sections 7.1 and 7.2 of the Instrument, a marketplace should not make the required order and trade information available to any other person or company on a more timely basis than it makes that information available to the information processor or information vendor. In addition, any information provided by a marketplace to an information processor or information vendor must include identification of the marketplace and should contain all relevant information including details as to volume, symbol, price and time of the order or trade.".
(11) Part 10 is amended by:
(a) striking out "; and" at the end of section 10.1(9); and
(b) adding the following as section 10.2:
"10.2 Availability of Information -- In complying with the requirements in sections 8.1 and 8.2 of the Instrument to provide accurate and timely order and trade information to an information processor or an information vendor that meets the standards set by a regulation services provider, a marketplace, an inter-dealer bond broker or dealer should not make the required order and trade information available to any other person or company on a more timely basis than it makes that information available to the information processor or information vendor.".
(12) The following is added as section 12.2:
"12.2 Discriminatory Terms -- Section 10.2 of the Instrument prohibits a marketplace from imposing terms that have the effect of discriminating between orders that are routed to that marketplace and orders that are entered on that marketplace.".
(13) Section 13.2 is repealed and replaced with the following:
"13.2 Synchronization of Clocks -- Subsections 11.5(1) and (2) of the Instrument require the synchronization of clocks with a regulation services provider that monitors the trading of the relevant securities on marketplaces, and by, as appropriate, inter-dealer bond brokers or dealers. The Canadian securities regulatory authorities are of the view that synchronization requires continual synchronization using an appropriate national time standard as chosen by a regulation services provider. Even if a marketplace has not retained a regulation services provider, its clocks should be synchronized with any regulation services provider monitoring trading in the particular securities traded on that marketplace. Each regulation services provider will monitor the information that it receives from all marketplaces, dealers and, if appropriate, inter-dealer bond brokers, to ensure that the clocks are appropriately synchronized. If there is more than one regulation services provider, in meeting their obligation to coordinate monitoring and enforcement under section 7.5 of NI 23-101, regulation services providers are required to agree on one standard against which synchronization will occur. In the event there is no regulation services provider, a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system are also required to coordinate with other recognized exchanges or recognized quotation and trade reporting systems regarding the synchronization of clocks.".
(14) Section 14.1 is repealed and replaced with the following:
"14.1 Systems Requirements -- This section applies to all the systems of a particular marketplace that are identified in the introduction to section 12.1 of the Instrument.
(1) Paragraph 12.1(a) of the Instrument requires the marketplace to develop and maintain an adequate system of internal control over the systems specified. As well, the marketplace is required to develop and maintain adequate general computer controls. These are the controls which are implemented to support information technology planning, acquisition, development and maintenance, computer operations, information systems support, and security. Recognized guides as to what constitutes adequate information technology controls include 'Information Technology Control Guidelines' from The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) and 'COBIT' from the IT Governance Institute.
(2) Paragraph 12.1(b) of the Instrument requires a marketplace to meet certain systems capacity, performance, business continuity and disaster recovery standards. These standards are consistent with prudent business practice. The activities and tests required in this paragraph are to be carried out at least once a year. In practice, continuing changes in technology, risk management requirements and competitive pressures will often result in these activities being carried out or tested more frequently.
(3) Subsection 12.2(1) of the Instrument requires a marketplace to engage a qualified party to conduct an annual independent assessment of the internal controls referred to in paragraph 12.1(a) of the Instrument. A qualified party is a person or company or a group of persons or companies with relevant experience in both information technology and in the evaluation of related internal controls in a complex information technology environment. Before engaging a qualified party, a marketplace should discuss its choice with the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority.
(4) Under section 15.1 of the Instrument, a regulator or the securities regulatory authority may consider granting a marketplace an exemption from the requirement to engage a qualified party to conduct an annual independent systems review and prepare a report under subsection 12.2(1) of the Instrument provided that the marketplace prepare a control self-assessment and file this self-assessment with the regulator or in Québec, the securities regulatory authority. The scope of the self-assessment would be similar to the scope that would have applied if the marketplace underwent an independent systems review. Reporting of the self-assessment results and the timeframe for reporting would be consistent with that established for an independent systems review.
In determining if the exemption is in the public interest, the regulator or securities regulatory authority may consider a number of factors including: the market share of the marketplace, the timing of the last independent systems review, and changes to systems or staff of the marketplace.".
(15) The following is added as section 14.2:
"14.2 Availability of Technology Specifications and Testing Facilities --
(1) Subsection 12.3(1) of the Instrument requires marketplaces to make their technology requirements regarding interfacing with or accessing the marketplace publicly available in their final form for at least three months. If there are material changes to these requirements after they are made publicly available and before operations begin, the revised requirements should be made publicly available for a new three month period prior to operations. The subsection also requires that an operating marketplace make its technology specifications publicly available for at least three months before implementing a material change to its technology requirements.
(2) Subsection 12.3(2) of the Instrument requires marketplaces to provide testing facilities for interfacing with or accessing the marketplace for at least two months immediately prior to operations once the technology requirements have been made publicly available. Should the marketplace make its specifications publicly available for longer than three months, it may make the testing available during that period or thereafter as long as it is at least two months prior to operations. If the marketplace, once it has begun operations, proposes material changes to its technology systems, it is required to make testing facilities publicly available for at least two months before implementing the material systems change.
(3) Subsection 12.3(4) of the Instrument provides that if a marketplace must make a change to its technology requirements regarding interfacing with or accessing the marketplace to immediately address a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment, it must immediately notify the regulator or, in Québec, the securities regulatory authority, and, if applicable, its regulation services provider. We expect the amended technology requirements to be made publicly available as soon as practicable, either while the changes are being made or immediately after.".
(16) Part 16 is amended by:
(a) repealing and replacing subsection 16.1(2) with the following:
"(2) An information processor is required under subsection 14.4(2) of the Instrument to provide timely, accurate, reliable and fair collection, processing, distribution and publication of information for orders for, and trades in, securities. The Canadian securities regulatory authorities expect that in meeting this requirement, an information processor will ensure that all marketplaces, inter-dealer bond brokers and dealers that are required to provide information are given access to the information processor on fair and reasonable terms. In addition, it is expected that an information processor will not give preference to the information of any marketplace, inter-dealer bond broker or dealer when collecting, processing, distributing or publishing that information.
(3) An information processor is required under subsection 14.4(5) of the Instrument to provide prompt and accurate order and trade information, and to not unreasonably restrict fair access to the information. As part of the obligation relating to fair access, an information processor is expected to make the disseminated and published information available on terms that are reasonable and not discriminatory. For example, an information processor will not provide order and trade information to any single person or company or group of persons or companies on a more timely basis than is afforded to others, and will not show preference to any single person or company or group of persons or companies in relation to pricing.";
(b) striking out "which are not unreasonably discriminatory" from paragraph 16.2(1)(b); and
(c) adding the following as section 16.4:
"16.4 System Requirements -- Section 14.1 of this Companion Policy contains guidance on the systems requirements as it applies to an information processor.".
1.2 Effective Date -- This instrument comes into force on January 28, 2010.
AMENDMENTS TO NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 23-101 TRADING RULES
1.1 Amendments
(1) This Instrument amends National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules.
(2) The following definitions are added to section 1.1:
"automated functionality" means the ability to
(a) immediately allow an incoming order that has been entered on the marketplace electronically to be marked as immediate-or-cancel;
(b) immediately and automatically execute an order marked as immediate-or-cancel against the displayed volume;
(c) immediately and automatically cancel any unexecuted portion of an order marked as immediate-or-cancel without routing the order elsewhere;
(d) immediately and automatically transmit a response to the sender of an order marked as immediate-or-cancel indicating the action taken with respect to the order; and
(e) immediately and automatically display information that updates the displayed orders on the marketplace to reflect any change to their material terms;
"protected bid" means a bid for an exchange-traded security, other than an option
(a) that is displayed on a marketplace that provides automated functionality; and
(b) about which information is required to be provided pursuant to Part 7 of NI 21-101 to an information processor or, if there is no information processor, to an information vendor that meets the standards set by a regulation services provider;
"protected offer" means an offer for an exchange-traded security, other than an option,
(a) that is displayed on a marketplace that provides automated functionality; and
(b) about which information is required to be provided pursuant to Part 7 of NI 21-101 to an information processor or, if there is no information processor, to an information vendor that meets the standards set by a regulation services provider; and
"protected order" means a protected bid or protected offer".
(2.1) The following definitions are added to section 1.1:
"calculated-price order" means an order for the purchase or sale of an exchange-traded security, other than an option, that is entered on a marketplace and for which the price of the security
(a) is not known at the time of order entry; and
(b) is not based, directly or indirectly, on the quoted price of an exchange-traded security at the time the commitment to execute the order was made;
"closing-price order" means an order for the purchase or sale of an exchange-traded security, other than an option, that is
(a) entered on a marketplace on a trading day; and
(b) subject to the conditions that
(i) the order be executed at the closing sale price of that security on that marketplace for that trading day; and
(ii) the order be executed subsequent to the establishment of the closing price;
"directed-action order" means a limit order for the purchase or sale of an exchange-traded security, other than an option, that,
(a) when entered on or routed to a marketplace is to be immediately
(i) executed against a protected order with any remainder to be booked or cancelled; or
(ii) placed in an order book;
(b) is marked as a directed-action order; and
(c) is entered or routed at the same time as one or more additional limit orders that are entered on or routed to one or more marketplaces, as necessary, to execute against any protected order with a better price than the order referred to in paragraph (a);
"non-standard order" means an order for the purchase or sale of an exchange-traded security, other than an option, that is entered on a marketplace and is subject to non-standardized terms or conditions related to settlement that have not been set by the marketplace on which the security is listed or quoted; and
"trade-through" means the execution of an order at a price that is,
(a) in the case of a purchase, higher than any protected offer, or
(b) in the case of a sale, lower than any protected bid.
(3) Subsection 3.1(2) is amended by adding "and the Derivatives Act" between "Securities Act" and "(Québec)".
(3.1) Part 6 is amended by adding the following:
(a) "and Locked or Crossed Orders" after "Trading Hours" in the title of Part 6; and
(b) 6.2 Locked or Crossed Orders -- A marketplace participant shall not intentionally
(a) enter on a marketplace a protected order to buy a security at a price that is the same as or higher than the best protected offer; or
(b) enter on a marketplace a protected order to sell a security at a price that is the same as or lower than the best protected bid.
(4) Part 6, as amended by subsection (3.1), is repealed and replaced by the following:
"PART 6 ORDER PROTECTION
6.1 Marketplace Requirements for Order Protection --
(1) A marketplace shall establish, maintain and ensure compliance with written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed
(a) to prevent trade-throughs on that marketplace other than the trade-throughs referred to in section 6.2; and
(b) to ensure that the marketplace, when executing a transaction that results in a trade-through referred to in section 6.2, is doing so in compliance with this Part.
(2) A marketplace shall regularly review and monitor the effectiveness of the policies and procedures required under subsection (1) and shall promptly remedy any deficiencies in those policies and procedures.
(3) At least 45 days before implementation, a marketplace shall file with the securities regulatory authority and, if applicable, its regulation services provider the policies and procedures, and any significant changes to those policies and procedures, established under subsection (1).
6.2 List of Trade-throughs -- The following are the trade-throughs referred to in paragraph 6.1(1)(a):
(a) a trade-through that occurs when the marketplace has reasonably concluded that the marketplace displaying the protected order that was traded through was experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data;
(b) the execution of a directed-action order;
(c) a trade-through by a marketplace that simultaneously routes a directed-action order to execute against the total displayed volume of any protected order that is traded through;
(d) a trade-though if, immediately before the trade-through, the marketplace displaying the protected order that is traded through displays as its best price a protected order with a price that is equal or inferior to the price of the trade-through;
(e) a trade-through that results when executing
(i) a non-standard order;
(ii) a calculated-price order; or
(iii) a closing-price order;
(f) a trade-through that was executed at a time when the best protected bid for the security traded through was higher than the best protected offer.
6.3 Systems or Equipment Failure, Malfunction or Material Delay --
(1) If a marketplace experiences a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems, equipment or its ability to disseminate marketplace data, the marketplace shall immediately notify
(a) all other marketplaces;
(b) all regulation services providers;
(c) its marketplace participants; and
(d) any information processor or, if there is no information processor, any information vendor that disseminates its data under Part 7 of NI 21-101.
(2) If executing a transaction described in paragraph 6.2(a), and a notification has not been sent under subsection (1), a marketplace that routes an order to another marketplace shall immediately notify
(a) the marketplace that it reasonably concluded is experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment or its ability to disseminate marketplace data;
(b) all regulation services providers;
(c) its marketplace participants; and
(d) any information processor disseminating information under Part 7 of NI 21-101.
(3) If a marketplace participant reasonably concludes that a marketplace is experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment or its ability to disseminate marketplace data, and routes an order to execute against a protected order on another marketplace displaying an inferior price, the marketplace participant must notify the following of the failure, malfunction or material delay
(a) the marketplace that may be experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment or its ability to disseminate marketplace data; and
(b) all regulation services providers.
6.4 Marketplace Participant Requirements for Order Protection --
(1) A marketplace participant must not enter a directed-action order unless the marketplace participant has established, and maintains and ensures compliance with, written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed
(a) to prevent trade-throughs other than the trade-throughs listed below:
(i) a trade-through that occurs when the marketplace participant has reasonably concluded that the marketplace displaying the protected order that was traded through was experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems or equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data;
(ii) a trade-through by a marketplace participant that simultaneously routes a directed-action order to execute against the total displayed volume of any protected order that is traded through;
(iii) a trade-through if, immediately before the trade-through, the marketplace displaying the protected order that is traded through displays as its best price a protected order with a price that is equal or inferior to the price of the trade-through transaction;
(iv) a trade-through that results when executing
(A) a non-standard order;
(B) a calculated-price order; or
(C) a closing-price order;
(v) a trade-through that was executed at a time when the best protected bid for the security traded through was higher than the best protected offer; and
(b) to ensure that when executing a trade-through listed in paragraphs (a)(i) to (a)(v), it is doing so in compliance with this Part.
(2) A marketplace participant that enters a directed-action order shall regularly review and monitor the effectiveness of the policies and procedures required under subsection (1) and shall promptly remedy any deficiencies in those policies and procedures.
6.5 Locked or Crossed Orders -- A marketplace participant shall not intentionally
(a) enter on a marketplace a protected order to buy a security at a price that is the same as or higher than the best protected offer; or
(b) enter on a marketplace a protected order to sell a security at a price that is the same as or lower than the best protected bid.
6.6 Trading Hours -- A marketplace shall set the hours of trading to be observed by marketplace participants.
6.7 Anti-Avoidance -- No person or company shall send an order to an exchange, quotation and trade reporting system or alternative trading system that does not carry on business in Canada in order to avoid executing against better-priced orders on a marketplace.
6.8 Application of this Part -- In Québec, this Part does not apply to standardized derivatives.".
(5) Part 7 is amended by:
(a) repealing paragraph 7.2(c) and replacing it with the following:
"(c) that the recognized exchange will transmit to the regulation services provider the information required by Part 11 of NI 21-101 and any other information reasonably required to effectively monitor:
(i) the conduct of and trading by marketplace participants on and across marketplaces, and
(ii) the conduct of the recognized exchange, as applicable; and"; and
(b) repealing paragraph 7.4(c) and replacing it with the following:
"(c) that the recognized quotation and trade reporting system will transmit to the regulation services provider the information required by Part 11 of NI 21-101 and any other information reasonably required to effectively monitor:
(i) the conduct of and trading by marketplace participants on and across marketplaces, and
(ii) the conduct of the recognized quotation and trade reporting system, as applicable; and"; and
(c) amending section 7.5 by striking out "under this Part" and substituting "under Parts 7 and 8".
(6) Paragraph 8.3(d) is repealed and replaced by the following:
"(d) that the ATS will transmit to the regulation services provider the information required by Part 11 of NI 21-101 and any other information reasonably required to effectively monitor:
(i) the conduct of and trading by marketplace participants on and across marketplaces, and
(ii) the conduct of the ATS; and".
(7) Section 9.3 is amended by striking out "IDA Policy No. 5 Code of Conduct for IDA Member Firms Trading in Domestic Debt Markets" and substituting "IIROC Rule 2800 Code of Conduct for Corporation Dealer Member Firms Trading in Wholesale Domestic Debt Markets".
1.2 Effective Date -
(1) This Instrument, other than subsections 1.1(2.1) and 1.1(4), comes into force on January 28, 2010.
(2) Subsections 1.1(2.1) and 1.1(4) come into force on February 1, 2011.
AMENDMENTS TO COMPANION POLICY 23-101CP -- To National Instrument 23-101 Trading Rules
1.1 Amendments
(1) This instrument amends Companion Policy 23-101CP.
(2) Part 1.1 is amended by adding the following after section 1.1.1:
"1.1.2 Definition of automated functionality -- Section 1.1 of the Instrument includes a definition of "automated functionality" which is the ability to: (1) act on an incoming order; (2) respond to the sender of an order; and (3) update the order by disseminating information to an information processor or information vendor. Automated functionality allows for an incoming order to execute immediately and automatically up to the displayed size and for any unexecuted portion of such incoming order to be cancelled immediately and automatically without being booked or routed elsewhere. Automated functionality involves no human discretion in determining the action taken with respect to an order after the time the order is received. A marketplace with this functionality should have appropriate systems and policies and procedures relating to the handling of immediate-or-cancel orders.
1.1.3 Definition of protected order --
(1) A protected order is defined to be a "protected bid or protected offer". A "protected bid" or "protected offer" is an order to buy or sell an exchange-traded security, other than an option, that is displayed on a marketplace that provides automated functionality and about which information is provided to an information processor or an information vendor, as applicable, pursuant to Part 7 of NI 21-101. The term "displayed on a marketplace" refers to the information about total disclosed volume on a marketplace. Volumes that are not disclosed or that are "reserve" or hidden volumes are not considered to be "displayed on a marketplace". The order must be provided in a way that enables other marketplaces and marketplace participants to readily access the information and integrate it into their systems or order routers.
(2) Subsection 5.1(3) of 21-101CP does not consider orders that are not immediately executable or that have special terms as "orders" that are required to be provided to an information processor or information vendor under Part 7 of NI 21-101. As a result, these orders are not considered to be "protected orders" under the definition in the Instrument and do not receive order protection. However, those executing against these types of orders are required to execute against all better-priced orders first. In addition, when entering a "special terms order" on a marketplace, if it can be executed against existing orders despite the special term, then the order protection obligation applies.".
(2.1) Part 1.1 is amended by adding the following after section 1.1.3:
"1.1.4 Definition of calculated-price order -- The definition of "calculated-price order" refers to any order where the price is not known at the time of order entry and is not based, directly or indirectly, on the quoted price of an exchange-traded security at the time the commitment to executing the order was made. This includes the following orders:
(a) a call market order -- where the price of a trade is calculated by the trading system of a marketplace at a time designated by the marketplace;
(b) an opening order -- where each marketplace may establish its own formula for the determination of opening prices;
(c) a closing order -- where execution occurs at the closing price on a particular marketplace, but at the time of order entry, the price is not known;
(d) a volume-weighted average price order -- where the price of a trade is determined by a formula that measures average price on one or more marketplaces; and
(e) a basis order -- where the price is based on prices achieved in one or more derivative transactions on a marketplace. To qualify as a basis order, this order must be approved by a regulation services provider or an exchange or quotation and trade reporting system that oversees the conduct of its members or users respectively.
1.1.5 Definition of directed-action order --
(1) An order marked as a directed-action order informs the receiving marketplace that the marketplace can act immediately to carry out the action specified by either the marketplace or marketplace participant who has sent the order and that the order protection obligation is being met by the sender. Such an order may be marked "DAO" by a marketplace or a marketplace participant. Senders can specify actions by adding markers that instruct a marketplace to:
(a) execute the order and cancel the remainder using an immediate-or-cancel marker,
(b) execute the order and book the remainder,
(c) book the order as a passive order awaiting execution, and
(d) avoid interaction with hidden liquidity using a bypass marker, as defined in IIROC's Universal Market Integrity Rules.
The definition allows for the simultaneous routing of more than one directed-action order in order to execute against any better-priced protected orders. In addition, marketplaces or marketplace participants may send a single directed-action order to execute against the best protected bid or best protected offer. When it receives a directed-action order, a marketplace can carry out the sender's instructions without checking for better-priced orders displayed by the other marketplaces and implementing the marketplace's own policies and procedures to reasonably prevent trade-throughs.
(2) Regardless of whether the entry of a directed-action order is accompanied by the bypass marker, the sender must take out all better-priced visible orders before executing at an inferior price. For example, if a marketplace or marketplace participant combines a directed-action order with a bypass marker to avoid executing against hidden liquidity, the order has order protection obligations regarding the visible liquidity. If a directed-action order interacts with hidden liquidity, the requirement to take out all better-priced visible orders before executing at an inferior price remains.
1.1.6 Definition of non-standard order -- The definition of "non-standard order" refers to an order for the purchase or sale of a security that is subject to terms or conditions relating to settlement that have not been set by the marketplace on which the security is listed or quoted. A marketplace participant, however, may not add a special settlement term or condition to an order solely for the purpose that the order becomes a non-standard order under the definition.".
(2.2) Part 6 is amended by adding the following:
(a) "and Locked or Crossed Markets" after "Trading Hours" in the tile of Part 6; and
(b) "6.2 Locked and Crossed Markets --
(1) Section 6.2 of the Instrument provides that a marketplace participant shall not intentionally lock or cross a market by entering a protected order to buy a security at a price that is the same as or higher than the best protected offer or entering a protected order to sell a security at a price that is the same as or lower than the best protected bid. The reference to a "protected order" means that when entering a visible, displayed order, a marketplace participant cannot lock or cross a visible, displayed order. It is not intended to prohibit the use of marketable limit orders.
(2) Section 6.2 of the Instrument prohibits a marketplace participant from intentionally locking or crossing a market. This would occur, for example, when a marketplace participant enters a locking or crossing order on a particular marketplace or marketplaces to avoid fees charged by a marketplace or to take advantage of rebates offered by a particular marketplace. There are situations where a locked or crossed market may occur unintentionally. For example:
(a) the locking or crossing order was displayed at a time when the marketplace displaying the locked or crossed order was experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems, equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data,
(b) the locking or crossing order was displayed at a time when a protected bid was higher than a protected offer;
(c) the locking or crossing order was posted after all displayed liquidity was executed and a reserve order generated a new visible bid above the displayed offer or offer below the displayed bid.".
(3) Part 6, as amended by subsection (2.2), is repealed and replaced with the following:
"PART 6 ORDER PROTECTION
6.1 Marketplace Requirements for Order Protection --
(1) Subsection 6.1(1) of the Instrument requires a marketplace to establish, maintain and ensure compliance with written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent trade-throughs by orders entered on that marketplace. A marketplace may implement this requirement in various ways. For example, the policies and procedures of a marketplace may reasonably prevent trade-throughs via the design of the marketplace's trade execution algorithms (by not allowing a trade-through to occur), or by voluntarily establishing direct linkages to other marketplaces. Marketplaces are not able to avoid their obligations by establishing policies and procedures that instead require marketplace participants to take steps to reasonably prevent trade-throughs.
(2) It is the responsibility of marketplaces to regularly review and monitor the effectiveness of their policies and procedures and take prompt steps to remedy any deficiencies in reasonably preventing trade-throughs and complying with subsection 6.1(2) of the Instrument. In general, it is expected that marketplaces maintain relevant information so that the effectiveness of its policies and procedures can be adequately evaluated by regulatory authorities. Relevant information would include information that describes:
(a) steps taken by the marketplace to evaluate its policies and procedures;
(b) any breaches or deficiencies found; and
(c) the steps taken to resolve the breaches or deficiencies.
(3) As part of the policies and procedures required in subsection 6.1(1) of the Instrument, a marketplace is expected to include a discussion of their automated functionality and how they will handle potential delayed responses as a result of an equipment or systems failure or malfunction experienced by another marketplace. In addition, marketplaces should include a discussion of how they treat a directed-action order when received and how it will be used.
(4) Order protection applies whenever two or more marketplaces with protected orders are open for trading. Some marketplaces provide a trading session at a price established by that marketplace during its regular trading hours for marketplace participants who are required to benchmark to a certain closing price. In these circumstances, under paragraph 6.2(e), a marketplace would not be required to take steps to reasonably prevent trade-throughs of orders on another marketplace.
6.2 Marketplace Participant Requirements for Order Protection --
(1) For a marketplace participant that wants to use a directed-action order, section 6.4 of the Instrument requires a marketplace participant to establish, maintain and ensure compliance with written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent trade-throughs. In general, it is expected that a marketplace participant that uses a directed-action order would maintain relevant information so that the effectiveness of its policies and procedures can be adequately evaluated by regulatory authorities. Relevant information would include information that describes:
(a) steps taken by the marketplace participant to evaluate its policies and procedures;
(b) any breaches or deficiencies found; and
(c) the steps taken to resolve the breaches or deficiencies.
The policies and procedures should also outline when it is appropriate to use a directed-action order and how it will be used as set out in paragraph 6.4(a) of the Instrument.
(2) Order protection applies whenever two or more marketplaces with protected orders are open for trading. Some marketplaces provide a trading session at a price established by that marketplace during its regular trading hours for marketplace participants who are required to benchmark to a certain closing price. In these circumstances, under paragraph 6.4(a)(iv)(C) of the Instrument, a marketplace participant would not be required to take steps to reasonably prevent trade-throughs of orders between marketplaces.
6.3 List of Trade-throughs -- Section 6.2 and paragraphs 6.4(a)(i) to (a)(v) of the Instrument set forth a list of "permitted" trade-throughs that are primarily designed to achieve workable order protection and to facilitate certain trading strategies and order types that are useful to investors.
(a)
(i) Paragraphs 6.2(a) and 6.4(a)(i) of the Instrument would apply where a marketplace or marketplace participant, as applicable, has reasonably concluded that a marketplace is experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems, equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data. A material delay occurs when a marketplace repeatedly fails to respond immediately after receipt of an order. This is intended to provide marketplaces and marketplace participants with flexibility when dealing with a marketplace that is experiencing systems problems (either of a temporary nature or a longer term systems issue).
(ii) Under subsection 6.3(1) of the Instrument, a marketplace that is experiencing systems issues is responsible for informing all other marketplaces, its marketplace participants, any information processor, or if there is no information processor, an information vendor disseminating its information under Part 7 of NI 21-101 and regulation services providers when a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems, equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data occurs. However, if a marketplace fails repeatedly to provide an immediate response to orders received and no notification has been issued by that marketplace that it is experiencing systems issues, the routing marketplace or a marketplace participant may, pursuant to subsections 6.3(2) and 6.3(3) of the Instrument respectively, reasonably conclude that the marketplace is having systems issues and may therefore rely on paragraph 6.2(a) or 6.4(a)(i) of the Instrument respectively. This reliance must be done in accordance with policies and procedures that outline processes for dealing with potential delays in responses by a marketplace and documenting the basis of its conclusion. If, in response to the notification by the routing marketplace or a marketplace participant, the marketplace confirms that it is not actually experiencing systems issues, the routing marketplace or marketplace participant may no longer rely on paragraph 6.2(a) or paragraph 6.4(a)(i) of the Instrument respectively.
(b) Paragraph 6.2(b) of the Instrument provides an exception from the obligation on marketplaces to use their policies and procedures to reasonably prevent trade-throughs when a directed-action order is received. Specifically, a marketplace that receives a directed-action order may immediately execute or book the order (or its remaining volume) and not implement the marketplace's policies and procedures to reasonably prevent trade-throughs. However, the marketplace will need to describe its treatment of a directed-action order in its policies and procedures. Paragraphs 6.2(c) and 6.4(a)(iii) of the Instrument provide an exception where a marketplace or marketplace participant simultaneously routes directed-action orders to execute against the total displayed volume of any protected order traded through. This accounts for the possibility that orders that are routed simultaneously as directed-action orders are not executed simultaneously causing one or more trade-throughs to occur because an inferior-priced order is executed first.
(c) Paragraphs 6.2(d) and 6.4(a)(ii) of the Instrument provide some relief due to moving or changing markets. Specifically, the exception allows for a trade-through to occur when immediately before executing the order that caused the trade-through, the marketplace on which the execution occurred had the best price but at the moment of execution, the market changes and another marketplace has the best price. The "changing markets" exception allows for the execution of an order on a marketplace, within the best bid or offer on that marketplace but outside the best bid or offer displayed across marketplaces in certain circumstances. This could occur for example:
(i) where orders are entered on a marketplace but by the time they are executed, the best bid or offer displayed across marketplaces changed; and
(ii) where a trade is agreed to off-marketplace and entered on a marketplace within the best bid and best offer across marketplaces, but by the time the order is executed on the marketplace (i.e. printed) the best bid or offer as displayed across marketplaces may have changed, thus causing a trade-through.
(d) The basis for the inclusion of calculated-price orders, non-standard orders and closing-price orders in paragraphs 6.2(e) and 6.4(a)(iv) of the Instrument is that these orders have certain unique characteristics that distinguish them from other orders. The characteristics of the orders relate to price (calculated-price orders and closing-price orders) and non-standard settlement terms (non-standard orders) that are not set by an exchange or a quotation and trade reporting system.
(e) Paragraphs 6.2(f) and 6.4(a)(v) of the Instrument include a transaction that occurred when there is a crossed market in the exchange-traded security. Without this allowance, no marketplace could execute transactions in a crossed market because it would constitute a trade-through. With order protection only applying to displayed orders or parts of orders, hidden or reserve orders may remain in the book after all displayed orders are executed. Consequently, crossed markets may occur. Intentionally crossing the market to take advantage of paragraphs 6.2(f) and 6.4(a)(v) of the Instrument would be a violation of section 6.5 of the Instrument.
6.4 Locked and Crossed Markets --
(1) Section 6.5 of the Instrument provides that a marketplace participant shall not intentionally lock or cross a market by entering a protected order to buy a security at a price that is the same as or higher than the best protected offer or entering a protected order to sell a security at a price that is the same as or lower than the best protected bid. The reference to a "protected order" means that when entering a visible, displayed order, a marketplace participant cannot lock or cross a visible, displayed order. It is not intended to prohibit the use of marketable limit orders. Paragraphs 6.2(f) and 6.4(a)(v) of the Instrument allow for the resolution of crossed markets that occur unintentionally.
(2) Section 6.5 of the Instrument prohibits a marketplace participant from intentionally locking or crossing a market. This would occur, for example, when a marketplace participant enters a locking or crossing order on a particular marketplace or marketplaces to avoid fees charged by a marketplace or to take advantage of rebates offered by a particular marketplace. There are situations where a locked or crossed market may occur unintentionally. For example:
(a) when a marketplace participant routes multiple directed-action orders that are marked immediate-or-cancel to a variety of marketplaces and because of latency issues, a locked or crossed market results,
(b) the locking or crossing order was displayed at a time when the marketplace displaying the locked or crossed order was experiencing a failure, malfunction or material delay of its systems, equipment or ability to disseminate marketplace data,
(c) the locking or crossing order was displayed at a time when a protected bid was higher than a protected offer;
(d) the locking or crossing order was posted after all displayed liquidity was executed and a reserve order generated a new visible bid above the displayed offer or offer below the displayed bid.
(3) If a marketplace participant using a directed-action order chooses to book the order or the remainder of the order, then it is responsible for ensuring that the booked portion of the directed-action order does not lock or cross the market. The Canadian securities regulatory authorities would consider a directed-action order or remainder of a directed-action order that is booked and that locks or crosses the market to be an intentional locking or crossing of the market and a violation of section 6.5 of the Instrument.
6.5 Anti-Avoidance Provision -- Section 6.7 of the Instrument prohibits a person or company from sending an order to an exchange, quotation and trade reporting system or alternative trading system that does not carry on business in Canada in order to avoid executing against better-priced orders on a marketplace in Canada. The intention of this section is to prevent the routing of orders to foreign marketplaces only for the purpose of avoiding the order protection regime in Canada.".
(4) Part 7 is amended by:
(a) striking out "IDA Policy No. 5 Code of Conduct for IDA Member Firms Trading in Domestic Debt Markets" and substituting "IIROC Rule 2800 Code of Conduct for Corporation Dealer Member Firms Trading in Wholesale Domestic Debt Markets" in section 7.3;
(b) adding the following as section 7.5:
"7.5 Agreement between a Marketplace and a Regulation Services Provider -- The purpose of subsections 7.2(c) and 7.4(c) of the Instrument is to facilitate the monitoring of trading by marketplace participants on and across multiple marketplaces by a regulation services provider. These sections of the Instrument also facilitate monitoring of the conduct of a recognized exchange and recognized quotation and trade reporting system for particular purposes. This may result in regulation services providers monitoring marketplaces that have retained them and reporting to a recognized exchange, recognized quotation and trade reporting system or securities regulatory authority if a marketplace is not meeting regulatory requirements or the terms of its own rules or policies and procedures. While the scope of this monitoring may change as the market evolves, we expect it to include, at a minimum, monitoring clock synchronization, the inclusion of specific designations, symbols and identifiers, order protection requirements and audit trail requirements.".
(c) adding the following as section 7.6:
"7.6 Coordination of Monitoring and Enforcement --
(1) Section 7.5 of the Instrument requires regulation services providers, recognized exchanges and recognized quotation and trade reporting systems to enter into a written agreement whereby they coordinate the enforcement of the requirements set under Parts 7 and 8. This coordination is required in order to achieve cross-marketplace monitoring.
(2) If a recognized exchange or recognized quotation and trade reporting system has not retained a regulation services provider, it is still required to coordinate with any regulation services provider and other exchanges or quotation and trade reporting systems that trade the same securities in order to ensure effective cross-marketplace monitoring.
(3) Currently, only IIROC is the regulation services provider for both exchange-traded securities, other than options and in Québec, other than standardized derivatives, and unlisted debt securities. If more than one regulation services provider regulates marketplaces trading a particular type of security, these regulation services providers must coordinate monitoring and enforcement of the requirements set.".
1.2 Effective Date --
(1) This instrument, other than subsections 1.1(2.1) and 1.1(3), comes into force on January 28, 2010.
(2) Subsections 1.1(2.1) and 1.1(3) come into force on February 1, 2011.
Notice and Request for Comment -- Proposed Amendments to NI 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities, Form 51-101F1 Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil And Gas Information, Form 51-101F2 Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor, Form 51-101F3 Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure and Companion Policy 51-101CP Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities
NOTICE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-101 STANDARDS OF DISCLOSURE FOR OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES,
FORM 51-101F1 STATEMENT OF RESERVES DATA AND OTHER OIL AND GAS INFORMATION,
FORM 51-101F2 REPORT ON RESERVES DATA BY
INDEPENDENT QUALIFIED RESERVES EVALUATOR OR AUDITOR,
FORM 51-101F3 REPORT OF MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS ON OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE AND
COMPANION POLICY 51-101CP STANDARDS OF DISCLOSURE FOR OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES
Background
We, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), are publishing for comment proposed amendments to National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities (NI 51-101), its related forms (the Forms) and companion policy (51-101CP) (collectively, the Instrument).{1}
NI 51-101 sets out the annual filing requirements for reporting issuers who are involved in oil and gas activities to report their estimates of reserves and resources. In addition, NI 51-101 sets out the general disclosure standards for reporting issuers who are reporting on their oil and gas activities. The disclosure standards apply to any disclosure made by a reporting issuer throughout the year.
Since the CSA implemented the Instrument in September 2003, we have monitored how it is working. As a result of CSA staff experience, we identified several areas in the Instrument which need to be amended.
We are publishing the proposed amendments to the Instrument with this Notice. You can find them on websites of CSA members, including the following:
• www.bcsc.bc.ca
• www.albertasecurities.com
• www.sfsc.gov.sk.ca
• www.msc.gov.mb.ca
• www.osc.gov.on.ca
• www.lautorite.qc.ca
We are publishing
• amending instruments for
• NI 51-101
• the Forms
• an amending document for 51-101CP
• an amending instrument for National Instrument 41-101 General Prospectus Requirements
We are also publishing a black-lined version of NI 51-101 and the Forms that integrate the proposed changes from the amending instrument.
Substance and purpose of the amendments
The proposed amendments to the Instrument fall into the following four broad categories:
1. Amendments to clarify some provisions of the Instrument.
2. Amendments to amend and add certain requirements to the annual filing requirements to provide for more comprehensive disclosure.
3. Amendments to certain provisions to provide new guidelines for disclosure of reserves and resources other than reserves.
4. Amendments to streamline requirements in the Instrument.
Summary of proposed amendments
We have summarized the significant proposed amendments in the Appendix. This is not a complete list of all the amendments.
We have clarified the signing requirements of Form 51-101F3. We have added a prohibition against adding across resource categories. This prohibition is intended to prevent misleading disclosure and to provide additional guidance to reporting issuers wishing to make meaningful and understandable disclosure of their oil and gas resources. We have added a requirement that the low estimate of reserves, contingent resources and prospective resources be included in the disclosure when the high estimate is disclosed.
We have amended the optional supplemental disclosure of reserves data in annual disclosure to allow for disclosure which is comparable to US disclosure. We have added a requirement in the annual disclosure to discuss the significant factors and uncertainties associated with properties for which no reserves have been developed.
We have removed the requirement to announce the annual filings with a press release and replaced it with the requirement to file a Form 51-101F4 notice on SEDAR.
We have removed definitions, requirements and guidance related to financial reporting to limit the scope of NI 51-101 to evaluation and disclosure practices related to reserves and resources other than reserves.
Alternatives considered
As discussed above, many of the amendments are intended to clarify the Instrument or to streamline requirements; however certain requirements are being introduced to assist reporting issuers in providing understandable oil and gas disclosure. One alternative to amending the Instrument was to issue a CSA Staff Notice to provide additional guidance on reserve and resource disclosure. However, CSA Staff Notice 51-327 already addresses several of the amendments noted above and CSA Staff continues to see misleading disclosure.
Anticipated costs and benefits
We believe that the proposed amendments to the Instrument will reduce issuers' costs, as the amendments will remove the requirement to disseminate a press release when filing annual disclosure. This requirement is replaced with a filing requirement on SEDAR, which would not have the dissemination costs associated with a press release. In addition, while the amendments do impose an additional mandatory requirement to discuss annually the significant uncertainties related to the reporting issuer's properties that have not been assigned reserves, we believe that given the growing importance of resources other than reserves to an oil and gas issuer's value, the value of this information to the public outweighs the costs of preparation. We also believe that the amendments will make reporting issuers' disclosure about oil and gas reserves and resources more meaningful and understandable to the public.
Consequential amendments
We propose to amend Item 5.5 of Form 41-101F1 Information Required in a Prospectus to remove the obligation to provide annual reports as at the year-end when an issuer is not engaged in oil and gas activities at its year-end. However, that issuer is required to provide an oil and gas report in accordance with the Form 51-101F1, Form 51-101F2 and Form 51-101F3 which is effective subsequent to the date on which the issuer engaged in oil and gas activities.
Related amendments
CSA Staff Notice 51-324 and CSA Staff Notice 51-327 will be amended to reflect changes to the Instrument.
Impact on investors
The proposed amendments will benefit investors in several important respects:
• By prohibiting the addition across resource categories, investors should receive more consistent, meaningful and understandable disclosure of oil and gas resources.
• By imposing a mandatory requirement to discuss annually the significant uncertainties related to the reporting issuer's properties that have not been assigned reserves, investors will receive additional disclosure about assets which have a growing importance to an oil and gas issuer's value.
Unpublished materials
In proposing amendments to the Instrument, we have not relied on any significant unpublished study, report, or other written materials.
Request for comments
We welcome your comments on the proposed amendments to the Instrument.
Please submit your comments on the proposed amendments to the Instrument in writing on or before March 19, 2010. If you are not sending your comments by email, you should also forward a diskette containing the submissions (in Windows format, Word).
Address your submission to all of the CSA member commissions, as follows:
Deliver your comments only to the addresses that follow. Your comments will be forwarded to the other CSA member jurisdictions.
We cannot keep submissions confidential because securities legislation in certain provinces requires publication of a summary of the written comments received during the comment period.
Questions
Please refer any questions you may have regarding this notice to the following people:
The text of the proposed amendments follows or can be found elsewhere on a CSA member website.
December 18, 2009
{1} In Ontario, paragraphs 143(1) 22, 24, 39 and 39.1 of the Securities Act provide the Ontario Securities Commission with authority to make the proposed amendments to the Instrument.
Appendix
Summary of proposed amendments
A. IFRS CHANGES
Accounting Terms or Phrases
We replaced the following terms used in NI 51-101 with the IFRS terms.
Original Term or Phrase |
IFRS Term or Phrase |
minority interest |
non-controlling interest |
B. OIL AND GAS DISCLOSURE CHANGES
National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities
We propose to amend NI 51-101 as follows:
Part 1 Application and Terminology
• by adding a definition of executive officer, which parallels the definition in National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations, in order to clarify the signing requirements outlined in paragraph 2.1(3)(e) of NI 51-101
• by adding a definition of Form 51-101F4 Notice of Filing of 51-101F1 Information
• by removing the word reservoirs from the definition of oil and gas activities and replacing it with the concept of subsurface, to allow for the broadest possible application
• by adding a definition of US oil and gas disclosure requirements that tracks changes to the US oil and gas securities regulatory regime to allow for supplemental reserves disclosure
Part 2 Annual Filing Requirements
• in paragraph 2.1(3)(e) by clarifying the Form 51-101F3 signing requirements
• in section 2.2 by removing the news release requirement and replacing it with a notice requirement
• in section 2.5 by providing additional Form 51-101F3 signing guidance, in particular for situations where the reporting issuer is not a corporation
Part 4 Measurement
• by deleting section 4.1
Part 5 Requirements Applicable to all Disclosure
• by clarifying that section 5.3 of NI 51-101 and the COGE Handbook apply to resources other than reserves
• by adding section 5.16 which prohibits addition across resources categories
• by adding section 5.17 which requires the disclosure of the low estimate when the high estimate is disclosed
Part 8 Exemptions
• by clarifying the application of section 8.2
Part 9 Instrument in Force
• by deleting section 9.2, as it is no longer relevant.
Form 51-101F1 Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information
We propose to amend the Form 51-101F1 as follows:
• by clarifying General Instruction (1)
• by including General Instruction (7) and (8) to assist reporting issuers in providing clear disclosure
• by modifying guidance related to the optional supplemental disclosure to allow for disclosure in accordance with US oil and gas disclosure requirements (in particular see Item 2.2 and Item 3.1)
• by clarifying that the information in Item 5.2 only applies to reserves data
• by providing guidance for calculating area where there are split-rights
• by adding a requirement to describe the significant factors and uncertainties related to the development of and production from properties without any reserves
• by requiring the disclosure of stratigraphic test wells
• by clarifying that Item 6.9 relates to gross daily production volumes
Form 51-101F2 Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor
We propose to amend Form 51-101F2 as follows:
• by clarifying the requirement that the evaluation must be done in accordance with the COGE Handbook, consistently applied.
Form 51-101F3 Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure
We propose to amend Form 51-101F3 as follows:
• by updating the form to mirror the changes to the signing requirements in NI 51-101 and the changes to the Form 51-101F2
51-101CP
The proposed amendments to 51-101CP reflect the changes to NI 51-101 described above and provide further guidance on how to interpret and apply NI 51-101.
C. GENERAL CHANGES
Resources to Resources Other than Reserves
"Resources" as defined in the COGE Handbook includes production and reserves. In order to clarify that certain guidance in NI 51-101, its related forms and companion policy currently only relates to resources other than reserves, where applicable, NI 51-101, its related forms and companion policy have been amended to change the term "resources" to "resources other than reserves".
Removal of Accounting References
We have removed definitions, requirements and guidance solely related to financial reporting by oil and gas issuers from NI 51-101 and related documents with the intention of focusing the regulatory scope of NI 51-101 and related forms on the technical evaluation and disclosure of reserves and resources other than reserves.
Term / Concept |
Explanation of Change |
CICA |
We removed the definition and references to CICA since the CICA is no longer relevant to |
NI 51-101 and related forms. |
|
CICA Accounting Guideline |
We removed the definition and references to CICA Accounting Guideline 16 as it will no |
16 |
longer be relied on for the purposes of NI 51-101 and related forms. |
CICA Handbook |
We removed the definition and references to CICA Handbook since it is no longer relevant |
to NI 51-101 and related forms. |
|
FAS 19 |
We removed the definition and references to FAS 19 since it is no longer relevant to the |
evaluation and disclosure prescribed by NI 51-101 and related forms. |
|
Full cost method of |
We removed section 4.1 of NI 51-101 on the basis that requirements as to the preparation |
accounting (section 4.1 of NI |
of financial statements are no longer within the scope NI 51-101. |
51-101) |
|
References to comparability |
We have removed these references to deemphasize the comparability of oil and gas |
of financial and reserves |
accounting and oil and gas technical evaluation practice. |
disclosure |
|
Section 3861 and Section |
We have removed this specific guidance as it will no longer be relied on for the purpose of |
3280 of CICA Handbook |
NI 51-101 and related forms. |
AMENDMENTS TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-101 STANDARDS OF DISCLOSURE FOR OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES
Although this amending instrument amends section headers in National Instrument 51-101, section headers do not form part of the instrument and are inserted for ease of reference only.
1. National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities is amended by this instrument.
2. Section 1.1 of National Instrument 51-101 is amended by
(a) repealing paragraph (c),
(b) repealing paragraph (d),
(c) repealing paragraph (e),
(d) adding the following after paragraph (h)
(h.1) "executive officer" means, for a reporting issuer, an individual who is
(i) a chair, vice-chair or president;
(ii) a vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function including sales, finance or production; or
(iii) performing a policy-making function in respect of the issuer;,
(e) repealing paragraph (i),
(f) adding the following after paragraph (n)
(n.1) "Form 51-101F4" means Form 51-101F4 Notice of Filing of 51-101F1 Information;,
(g) in clause (s)(i)(B), replacing "reservoirs on" with "the subsurface of",
(h) in clause (s)(i)(C), replacing "reservoirs" with "subsurface locations",
(i) in paragraph (aa), deleting "and" at the end of the paragraph,
(j) in paragraph (bb), by adding "and" at the end of the paragraph, and
(k) adding the following after paragraph (bb)
"US oil and gas disclosure requirements" means the disclosure requirements relating to reserves and oil and gas activities under US federal securities law and include disclosure requirements or guidelines imposed or issued by the SEC, as amended from time to time..
3. Paragraph 3(e) of section 2.1 of National Instrument 51-101 is replaced with the following
(e) is signed
(i) by
(A) the chief executive officer; and
(B) a person other than the chief executive officer that is an executive officer of the reporting issuer; and
(ii) on behalf of the board of directors, by
(A) any two directors of the reporting issuer, other than the persons referred to in subparagraph (i) above, or
(B) if the issuer has only three directors, two of whom are the persons referred to in subparagraph (i), all of the directors of the reporting issuer..
4. Section 2.2 of National Instrument 51-101 is replaced with the following
2.2 Notice of Filing of 51-101F1 Information -- A reporting issuer must, concurrently with filing a statement and reports under section 2.1, file with the securities regulatory authority a notice of filing of 51-101F1 information in accordance with Form 51-101F4..
5. Section 2.5 of National Instrument 51-101 is added after section 2.4 as follows
2.5 Reporting Issuer Not a Corporation -- if the reporting issuer is not a corporation, a report in accordance with Form 51-101F3 must be signed by the persons who, in relation to the reporting issuer, are in a similar position or perform similar functions to the persons required to sign under item 3 of section 2.1..
6. Section 4.1 of National Instrument 51-101 is repealed.
7. Section 5.3 of National Instrument 51-101 is replaced with the following
5.3 Classification of Reserves and of Resources Other than Reserves -- Disclosure of reserves or of resources other than reserves must apply the terminology and categories set out in the COGE Handbook and must relate to the most specific category of reserves or of resources other than reserves in which the reserves or resources other than reserves can be classified..
8. Section 5.9 of National Instrument 51-101 is amended by
(a) in the title, adding "Other than Reserves" after "Resources",
(b) in the preamble to subsection (2), adding "other than reserves" after "resources",
(c) replacing paragraph (2)(b) with the following
(b) relate to the most specific category of resources other than reserves as required by section 5.3;,
(d) adding the following after paragraph (2)(b)
(b.1) have been prepared or audited in accordance with the COGE Handbook; and.
9. Section 5.10 of National Instrument 51-101 is amended by replacing "5.2, 5.3 and 5.9" wherever it occurs with "5.2, 5.3, 5.9 and 5.16".
10. National Instrument 51-101 is amended by adding the following after section 5.15
5.16 Prohibition Against Addition Across Resource Categories
(1) A reporting issuer must not disclose a summation of any combination of an estimate of quantity or value of any two or more of the following:
(a) reserves;
(b) contingent resources;
(c) prospective resources;
(d) the unrecoverable portion of discovered petroleum initially-in-place;
(e) the unrecoverable portion of undiscovered petroleum initially-in-place;
(f) discovered petroleum initially-in-place; and
(g) undiscovered petroleum initially-in-place.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), a reporting issuer may disclose an estimate of total petroleum initially-in-place, discovered petroleum initially-in-place and undiscovered petroleum initially-in-place if:
(a) the estimate of quantity or value of all subcategories are also disclosed, including the unrecoverable portion(s); and
(b) there is a cautionary statement that is proximate to the estimate, in bold font, to the effect that:
"The [total petroleum initially-in-place, discovered petroleum initially-in-place or undiscovered petroleum initially-in-place,] includes unrecoverable volumes and is not an estimate of the [value or volume] of the substances that will ultimately be recovered.".
5.17 Disclosure of High- and Low-Case Estimates of Reserves and Resources other than Reserves
(1) If a reporting issuer discloses an estimate of proved + probable + possible reserves, the reporting issuer must also disclose the corresponding estimates of proved and proved + probable reserves.
(2) If a reporting issuer discloses a high-case estimate, the reporting issuer must also disclose the corresponding low- and best-case estimates..
11. Subsection 8.2(2) of National Instrument 51-101 is amended by replacing "in accordance with" with "under".
12. Section 9.2 of National Instrument 51-101 is repealed.
13. Form 51-101F1 Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information is amended by this instrument.
14. The General Instructions of Form 51-101F1 are amended as follows
(a) Instruction (3) is replaced by
(3) The numbering, headings and ordering of items included in this Form 51-101F1 are guidelines only. Information may be provided in tables.,
(b) Instruction (6) is followed by
(7) If a reporting issuer discloses financial information in a currency other than the Canadian dollar, clearly, and as frequently as is appropriate to avoid confusing or misleading readers, disclose the currency in which the financial information is disclosed.
(8) Reporting Issuers should refer to the COGE Handbook for the proper reporting of units of measurement. Reporting issuers should not, without compelling reason, switch between imperial units of measure (such as barrels) and Système International (SI) units of measurement (such as tonnes) within or between disclosure documents..
15. Instruction (1) of Item 1.1 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by deleting "It is the date of the balance sheet for the reporting issuer's most recent financial year (for example, "as at December 31, 20xx") and the ending date of the reporting issuer's most recent annual statement of income (for example, "for the year ended December 31, 20xx").".
16. Item 2.2 of Form 51-101F1 is replaced with
Item 2.2 Supplemental Disclosure of Reserves Data
The reporting issuer may supplement its disclosure of reserves data under Item 2.1 by also disclosing the components of Item 2.1, using prices and costs as determined in a manner consistent with the relevant US oil and gas disclosure requirements..
17. Items 2.3 and 2.4 of Form 51-101F1 are amended by replacing "minority interest" wherever it occurs with "non-controlling interest".
18. Instruction (3) of Item 2.4 of Form 51-101F1 is repealed.
19. Item 3.1 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by
(a) in the title, deleting "Constant Prices Used in", and
(b) replacing "operates, as at the last day of the reporting issuer's most recent financial year" with "operates as determined in a manner consistent with the relevant US oil and gas disclosure requirements".
20. Instruction (2) of Item 3.2 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by deleting "term" constant prices and costs "and the" and replacing "include" with "includes".
21. Item 5.2 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by
(a) in the title, adding "Affecting Reserves Data" after "Uncertainties",
(b) replacing "important" with "significant", and
(c) in the Instruction, deleting", the need to build a major pipeline or other major facility before production of reserves can begin,".
22. Form 51-101F1 is amended by adding the following after Section 2 of Item 6.2
INSTRUCTION
If a reporting issuer holds interests in different formations under the same surface area pursuant to separate leases, disclose the method of calculating the gross and net area. For example, if the reporting issuer has included the area of each of its leases in its calculation of net area despite the fact that certain leases will pertain to the same surface area, disclose that fact. A general description of the method of calculating the area will suffice.
Item 6.2.1 Significant Factors or Uncertainties Relevant to Properties With No Attributed Reserves
1. Identify and discuss significant economic factors or significant uncertainties that affect the anticipated development or production activities on properties with no attributed reserves.
2. Section 1 does not apply if the information is disclosed in the reporting issuer's financial statements for the financial year ended on the effective date.
INSTRUCTION
Examples of information that could warrant disclosure under this Item 6.2.1 include unusually high expected development costs or operating costs or the need to build a major pipeline or other major facility before production can begin..
23. Section 2 of Item 6.3 of Form 51-101F1 is replaced with
2. Section 1 does not apply to agreements specifically disclosed by the reporting issuer in its financial statements for the financial year ended on the effective date..
24. Paragraph 1(b) of Item 6.7 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by replacing "gas wells and service wells" with "gas wells, service wells and stratigraphic test wells".
25. Paragraph 1(a) of Item 6.9 of Form 51-101F1 is amended by adding "gross" between "average" and "daily" and by deleting ", before deduction of royalties".
26. Form 51-101F2 Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor is amended by this instrument.
27. Item 5 of Form 51-101F2 is amended by adding ", consistently applied" after "in accordance with the COGE Handbook".
28. Item 7 of Form 51-101F2 is amended by deleting "However, any variations should be consistent with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery.".
29. Form 51-101F3 Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure is amended by this instrument.
30. Form 51-101F3 is amended by
(a) deleting "However, any variations should be consistent with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery.", and
(b) replacing "a senior officer" with "an executive officer".
31. National Instrument 51-101 is amended by adding the following Form
FORM 51-101F4
NOTICE OF
FILING OF 51-101F1 INFORMATION
This is the form referred to in section 2.2 of National Instrument 51-101 Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities ("NI 51-101").
On [date of SEDAR Filing], [name of reporting issuer] filed its reports under section 2.1 of NI 51-101, which can be found [describe where a copy of the filed information can be found for viewing by electronic means].
32. This instrument comes into force on January 1, 2011.
AMENDMENTS TO
COMPANION POLICY 51-101CP STANDARDS OF DISCLOSURE FOR OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES
1. Companion Policy 51-101CP Standards of Disclosure for Oil and Gas Activities is amended.
2. Section 1.2 is amended by replacing "including disclosure of reserves and resources" with "including disclosure of reserves and of resources other than reserves".
3. Section 1.4 is amended by deleting "This concept of materiality is consistent with the concept of materiality applied in connection with financial reporting pursuant to the CICA Handbook.".
4. Section 2.3 is amended by replacing "The report of management and directors in Form 51-101F3 may be combined with management's report on financial statements, if any, in respect of the same financial year." with the following
A reporting issuer may supplement the annual disclosure required under NI 51-101 with additional information corresponding to that prescribed in Form 51-101F1, Form 51-101F2 and Form 51-101F3, but as at dates, or for periods, subsequent to those for which annual disclosure is required. However, to avoid confusion, such supplementary disclosure should be clearly identified as being interim disclosure and distinguished from the annual disclosure (for example, if appropriate, by reference to a particular interim period). Supplementary interim disclosure does not satisfy the annual disclosure requirements of section 2.1 of NI 51-101..
5. Subsection 2.4(2) is amended by replacing "A reporting issuer that elects to follow this approach should file its annual information form in accordance with the usual requirements of securities legislation, and at the same time on SEDAR in the category for NI 51-101 oil and gas disclosure, a notification that the information required under section 2.1 of NI 51-101 is included in the reporting issuer's filed annual information form. More specifically, the notification should be filed under SEDAR Filing Type: "Oil and Gas Annual Disclosure (NI 51-101)" and Filing Subtype/Document Type: "Oil and Gas Annual Disclosure Filing (Forms 51-101F1, F2 & F3)". Alternatively, the notification could be a copy of the news release mandated by section 2.2 of NI 51-101. If this is the case, the news release should be filed under SEDAR Filing Type: "Oil and Gas Annual Disclosure (NI 51-101)" and Filing Subtype/Document Type: "News Release (section 2.2 of NI 51-101)"." with "However, a reporting issuer that elects to follow this approach continues to be subject to the requirement to file, at the same time and on SEDAR, in the appropriate SEDAR category, the notice in accordance with Form 51-101F4 (see section 2.2 of NI 51-101).".
6. Section 2.7 is amended by
(a) replacing subsection (4), with the following
(4) Supplemental Disclosure of Future Net Revenue- In addition to requiring the disclosure of future net revenue using forecast prices and costs, Form 51-101 F1 gives reporting issuers the option of disclosing future net revenue based on prices and costs determined in accordance with the relevant US oil and gas disclosure requirements. In general, these prices and costs are assumed not to change, but rather to remain constant, throughout the life of a property, except to the extent of certain fixed or presently determinable future prices or costs to which the reporting issuer is legally bound by a contractual or other obligation to supply a physical product (including those for an extension period of a contract that is likely to be extended).,
(b) repealing subsection (5), and
(c) in subsection (7), deleting "Like a "subsequent event" note in a financial statement, the issuer should discuss this type of information even if it pertains to a period subsequent to the effective date.".
7. Subsection 2.8(2) is amended by replacing "Form 51-101F2 (and Form 51-101F3) contains a statement that variations between reserves data and actual results may be material but that any variations should be consistent with the fact that reserves are categorized according to the probability of their recovery." with "The report prescribed by Form 51-101F2 contains statements to the effect that variations between reserves data and actual results may be material but reserves have been determined in accordance with the COGE Handbook, consistently applied." and replacing "Any variations arising due to technical factors should be consistent" with "Any variations arising due to technical factors must be consistent".
8. Subsection 5.2(5) is replaced by the following
(5) Availability of Funding -- In assigning reserves to an undeveloped property, the reporting issuer is not required to have the funding available to develop the reserves, since they may be developed by means other than the expenditure of the reporting issuer's funds (for example by a farm-out or sale). Reserves must be estimated assuming that development of the properties will occur without regard to the likely availability of funding required for that property. The reporting issuer's evaluator is not required to consider whether the reporting issuer will have the capital necessary to develop the reserves. (See section 7 of COGE Handbook and subparagraph 5.2(a)(iv) of NI 51-101.)
However, item 5.3 of Form 51-101F1 requires a reporting issuer to discuss its expectations as to the sources and costs of funding for estimated future development costs as a part of its annual disclosure. If the issuer expects that the costs of funding would make development of a property unlikely, then even if reserves were assigned, it must also discuss that expectation and its plans for the property.
Disclosure of an estimate of reserves, contingent resources or prospective resources in respect of which timely availability of funding for development is not assured may be misleading if that disclosure is not accompanied, proximate to it, by a discussion (or a cross-reference to such a discussion in other disclosure filed by the reporting issuer on SEDAR) of the funding uncertainties and their anticipated effect on the timing or completion of such development (or on any particular stage of multi-stage development such as often observed in oilsands developments)..
9. Section 5.3 is replaced with the following
5.3 Classification of Reserves and of Resources Other than Reserves
Section 5.3 of NI 51-101 requires that any disclosure of reserves or of resources other than reserves must apply the categories and terminology set out in the COGE Handbook. The definitions of the various resource categories derived from the COGE Handbook are provided in the NI 51-101 Glossary. In addition, section 5.3 of NI 51-101 requires that disclosure of reserves and of resources other than reserves must relate to the most specific category of reserves or of resources other than reserves in which the reserves or resources other than reserves can be classified. For instance, there are several subcategories of discovered resources including reserves, contingent resources and discovered unrecoverable resources. Reporting issuers must classify discovered resources into one of the subcategories of discovered resources.
In addition, reserves can be estimated using three subcategories, namely proved, probable or possible reserves, according to the probability that such quantities will actually be produced. As described in the COGE Handbook proved, probable and possible reserves represent conservative, realistic and optimistic estimates of reserves, respectively. Therefore any disclosure of reserves must be broken down into one of the three subcategories of reserves, namely proved, probable or possible reserves. For further guidance on disclosure of reserves and of resources other than reserves please see sections 5.2 and 5.5 of this Companion Policy..
10. Section 5.5 is amended by, in the title, adding "Other than Reserves" after "Resources".
11. Subsection 5.5(1) is replaced with the following
(1) Disclosure of Resources Generally - The disclosure of resources, excluding proved and probable reserves, is not mandatory under NI 51-101, except that a reporting issuer must make disclosure concerning its unproved properties and resource activities in its annual filings as described in Part 6 of Form 51-101F1. Additional disclosure beyond this is voluntary and must comply with section 5.9 of NI 51-101 if anticipated results from the resources other than reserves are voluntarily disclosed.
For prospectuses, the general securities disclosure obligation of "full, true and plain" disclosure of all material facts would require the disclosure of reserves or of resources other than reserves that are material to the issuer, even if the disclosure is not mandated by NI 51-101. Any such disclosure should be based on supportable analysis.
Disclosure of resources other than reserves may involve the use of statistical measures that may be unfamiliar to a user. It is the responsibility of the evaluator and the reporting issuer to be familiar with these measures and for the reporting issuer to be able to explain them to investors. Information on statistical measures may be found in the COGE Handbook (section 9 of volume 1 and section 4 of volume 2) and in the extensive technical literature4 on the subject.
12. Subsection 5.5(2) is amended by replacing "A reporting issuer cannot aggregate properties across different categories of resources if a resource estimate referenced in subsection 5.9(2) is disclosed." with "A reporting issuer must not disclose an estimate reflecting a summation of different categories of resources (see section 5.16 of NI 51-101).".
13. Paragraph 5.5(3)(b) is replaced by the following
(b) Definitions of Resource Categories
For the purpose of complying with the requirement of defining the resource category, the reporting issuer must ensure that disclosure of the definition is consistent with the resource categories and terminology set out in the COGE Handbook, pursuant to section 5.3 of NI 51-101. Section 5 of volume 1 of the COGE Handbook and the NI 51-101 Glossary identify and define the various resource categories.
A reporting issuer may wish to report reserves or resources other than reserves of oil or gas as "in-place volumes". By definition, reserves of any type, contingent resources and prospective resources are estimates of volumes that are recoverable or potentially recoverable and, as such, cannot be described as being "in-place". Terms such as "potential reserves", "undiscovered reserves", "reserves in place", "in-place reserves" or similar terms must not be used because they are incorrect and misleading. The disclosure of reserves or of resources other than reserves must be consistent with the terminology and categories set out in the COGE Handbook, pursuant to section 5.3 of NI 51-101.
The reporting issuer can report other categories of resources, such as discovered petroleum initially-in-place, undiscovered petroleum initially-in-place and total petroleum initially-in-place. However, the additional disclosure required by section 5.16 of NI 51-101 must also be included..
14. These amendments become effective on January 1, 2011.
PROPOSED AMENDING INSTRUMENT TO
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 41-101 GENERAL PROSPECTUS REQUIREMENTS
1. National Instrument 41-101 General Prospectus Requirements is amended by this instrument.
2. Item 5.5 of Form 41-101F1 Information Required in a Prospectus is replaced with the following
5.5
(1) If the issuer is engaged in oil and gas activities as defined in NI 51-101 and any of the oil and gas information is material as contemplated under NI 51-101 in respect of the issuer, disclose that information in accordance with Form 51-101F1
(a) as at the end of, and for, the most recent financial year for which the prospectus includes an audited balance sheet of the issuer,
(b) in the absence of a completed financial year referred to in paragraph (a), as at the most recent date for which the prospectus includes an audited balance sheet of the issuer, and for the most recent financial period for which the prospectus includes an audited income statement of the issuer, or
(c) if the issuer was not engaged in oil and gas activities at the date set out in paragraphs (a) or (b), as of a date subsequent to the date the issuer first engaged in oil and gas activities as defined in NI 51-101 and prior to the date of the preliminary prospectus.
(2) Include with the disclosure under subsection (1) a report in the form of Form 51-101F2, on the reserves data included in the disclosure required under subsection (1).
(3) Include with the disclosure under subsection (1) a report in the form of Form 51-101F3 that refers to the information disclosed under subsection (1).
(4) To the extent not reflected in the information disclosed in response to subsection (1), disclose the information contemplated by Part 6 of NI 51-101 in respect of material changes that occurred after the applicable balance sheet referred to in subsection (1)..
This instrument comes into force on January 1, 2011.
NATIONAL INSTRUMENT 51-101
STANDARDS OF DISCLOSURE
FOR OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES
PART 1 APPLICATION AND TERMINOLOGY{1}
1.1 Definitions{2} -- In this Instrument:
(a) "annual information form" has the same meaning as "AIF" in NI 51-102;
(a.1) "analogous information" means information about an area outside the area in which the reporting issuer has an interest or intends to acquire an interest, which is referenced by the reporting issuer for the purpose of drawing a comparison or conclusion to an area in which the reporting issuer has an interest or intends to acquire an interest, which comparison or conclusion is reasonable, and includes:
(i) historical information concerning reserves;
(ii) estimates of the volume or value of reserves;
(iii) historical information concerning resources;
(iv) estimates of the volume or value of resources;
(v) historical production amounts;
(vi) production estimates; or
(vii) information concerning a field, well, basin or reservoir;
(a.2) "anticipated results" means information that may, in the opinion of a reasonable person, indicate the potential value or quantities of resources in respect of the reporting issuer's resources or a portion of its resources and includes:
(i) estimates of volume;
(ii) estimates of value;
(iii) areal extent;
(iv) pay thickness;
(v) flow rates; or
(vi) hydrocarbon content;
(b) "BOEs" means barrels of oil equivalent;
(c)
"CICA" means The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants;repealed;(d)
"CICA Accounting Guideline 16" means Accounting Guideline AcG-16 "Oil and gas accounting -- full cost" included in the CICA Handbook, as amended from time to time;repealed;(e)
"CICA Handbook" means the Handbook of the CICA, as amended from time to time;repealed;(f) "COGE Handbook" means the "Canadian Oil and Gas Evaluation Handbook" prepared jointly by The Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum (Petroleum Society), as amended from time to time;
(g) repealed;
(h) "effective date", in respect of information, means the date as at which, or for the period ended on which, the information is provided;
(h.1) "executive officer" means, for a reporting issuer, an individual who is
(i) a chair, vice-chair or president;
(ii) a vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function including sales, finance or production; or
(iii) performing a policy-making function in respect of the issuer;
(i)
"FAS 19" means United States Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19 "Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies", as amended from time to time;repealed;(j) "forecast prices and costs" means future prices and costs that are:
(i) generally accepted as being a reasonable outlook of the future;
(ii) if, and only to the extent that, there are fixed or presently determinable future prices or costs to which the reporting issuer is legally bound by a contractual or other obligation to supply a physical product, including those for an extension period of a contract that is likely to be extended, those prices or costs rather than the prices and costs referred to in subparagraph (i);
(k) "foreign geographic area" means a geographic area outside North America within one country or including all or portions of a number of countries;
(l) "Form 51-101F1" means Form 51-101F1 Statement of Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information;
(m) "Form 51-101F2" means Form 51-101F2 Report on Reserves Data by Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor;
(n) "Form 51-101F3" means Form 51-101F3 Report of Management and Directors on Oil and Gas Disclosure;
(n.1) "Form 51-101F4" means Form 51-101F4 Notice of Filing of 51-101F1 Information;
(o) "independent", in respect of the relationship between a reporting issuer and a person or company, means a relationship between the reporting issuer and that person or company in which there is no circumstance that could, in the opinion of a reasonable person aware of all relevant facts, interfere with that person's or company's exercise of judgment regarding the preparation of information which is used by the reporting issuer;
(p) "McfGEs" means thousand cubic feet of gas equivalent;
(q) "NI 14-101" means National Instrument 14-101 Definitions;
(r) repealed;
(r.1) "NI 51-102" means National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligations;
(s) "oil and gas activities"
(i) include:
(A) the search for crude oil or natural gas in their natural states and original locations;
(B) the acquisition of property rights or properties for the purpose of further exploring for or removing oil or gas from
reservoirs onthe subsurface ofthose properties;(C) the construction, drilling and production activities necessary to retrieve oil and gas from their natural
reservoirssubsurface locations, and the acquisition, construction, installation and maintenance of field gathering and storage systems including lifting the oil and gas to the surface and gathering, treating, field processing and field storage; and(D) the extraction of hydrocarbons from oil sands, shale, coal or other non-conventional sources and activities similar to those referred to in clauses (A), (B) and (C) undertaken with a view to such extraction; but
(ii) do not include:
(A) transporting, refining or marketing oil or gas;
(B) activities relating to the extraction of natural resources other than oil and gas and their by-products; or
(C) the extraction of geothermal steam or of hydrocarbons as a by-product of the extraction of geothermal steam or associated geothermal resources;
(t) "preparation date", in respect of written disclosure, means the most recent date to which information relating to the period ending on the effective date was considered in the preparation of the disclosure;
(u) "production group" means one of the following together, in each case, with associated by-products:
(i) light and medium crude oil (combined);
(ii) heavy oil;
(iii) associated gas and non-associated gas (combined); and
(iv) bitumen, synthetic oil or other products from non-conventional oil and gas activities.
(v) "product type" means one of the following:
(i) in respect of conventional oil and gas activities:
(A) light and medium crude oil (combined);
(B) heavy oil;
(C) natural gas excluding natural gas liquids; or
(D) natural gas liquids; and
(ii) in respect of non-conventional oil and gas activities:
(A) synthetic oil;
(B) bitumen;
(C) coal bed methane;
(D) hydrates;
(E) shale oil; or
(F) shale gas;
(w) "professional organization" means a self-regulatory organization of engineers, geologists, other geoscientists or other professionals whose professional practice includes reserves evaluations or reserves audits, that:
(i) admits members primarily on the basis of their educational qualifications;
(ii) requires its members to comply with the professional standards of competence and ethics prescribed by the organization that are relevant to the estimation, evaluation, review or audit of reserves data;
(iii) has disciplinary powers, including the power to suspend or expel a member; and
(iv) is either:
(A) given authority or recognition by statute in a Canadian jurisdiction; or
(B) accepted for this purpose by the securities regulatory authority or the regulator;
(x) "qualified reserves auditor" means an individual who:
(i) in respect of particular reserves data, resources or related information, possesses professional qualifications and experience appropriate for the estimation, evaluation, review and audit of the reserves data, resources and related information; and
(ii) is a member in good standing of a professional organization;
(y) "qualified reserves evaluator" means an individual who:
(i) in respect of particular reserves data, resources or related information, possesses professional qualifications and experience appropriate for the estimation, evaluation and review of the reserves data, resources and related information; and
(ii) is a member in good standing of a professional organization;
(z) "qualified reserves evaluator or auditor" means a qualified reserves auditor or a qualified reserves evaluator;
(z.1) "reserves" means proved, probable or possible reserves;
(aa) "reserves data" means an estimate of proved reserves and probable reserves and related future net revenue, estimated using forecast prices and costs;
and(bb) "supporting filing" means a document filed by a reporting issuer with a securities regulatory authority
.; and(cc) "US oil and gas disclosure requirements" means the disclosure requirements relating to reserves and oil and gas activities under US federal securities law and include disclosure requirements or guidelines imposed or issued by the SEC, as amended from time to time.
1.2 COGE Handbook Definitions
(1) Terms used in this Instrument but not defined in this Instrument, NI 14-101 or the securities statute in the jurisdiction, and defined or interpreted in the COGE Handbook, have the meaning or interpretation ascribed to those terms in the COGE Handbook.
(2) In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the definition of a term in this Instrument, NI 14-101 or the securities statute in the jurisdiction and the meaning ascribed to the term in the COGE Handbook, the definition in this Instrument, NI 14-101 or the securities statute in the jurisdiction, as the case may be, applies.
1.3 Applies to Reporting Issuers Only -- This Instrument applies only to reporting issuers engaged, directly or indirectly, in oil and gas activities.
1.4 Materiality Standard
(1) This Instrument applies only in respect of information that is material in respect of a reporting issuer.
(2) For the purpose of subsection (1), information is material in respect of a reporting issuer if it would be likely to influence a decision by a reasonable investor to buy, hold or sell a security of the reporting issuer.
PART 2 ANNUAL FILING REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Reserves Data and Other Oil and Gas Information -- A reporting issuer must, not later than the date on which it is required by securities legislation to file audited financial statements for its most recent financial year, file with the securities regulatory authority the following:
1.Statement of Reserves Data and Other Information -- a statement of the reserves data and other information specified in Form 51-101F1, as at the last day of the reporting issuer's most recent financial year and for the financial year then ended;
2. Report of Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor -- a report in accordance with Form 51-101F2 that is:
(a) included in, or filed concurrently with, the document filed under item 1; and
(b) executed by one or more qualified reserves evaluators or auditors each of whom is independent of the reporting issuer, who must in the aggregate have:
(i) evaluated or audited at least 75 percent of the future net revenue (calculated using a discount rate of 10 percent) attributable to proved plus probable reserves, as reported in the statement filed or to be filed under item 1; and
(ii) reviewed the balance of such future net revenue; and
3. Report of Management and Directors -- a report in accordance with Form 51-101F3 that
(a) refers to the information filed or to be filed under items 1 and 2;
(b) confirms the responsibility of management of the reporting issuer for the content and filing of the statement referred to in item 1 and for the filing of the report referred to in item 2;
(c) confirms the role of the board of directors in connection with the information referred to in paragraph (b);
(d) is contained in, or filed concurrently with, the statement filed under item 1; and
(e) is
executed by two senior officers and twosigned(i) by
(A) the chief executive officer; and
(B) person other than the chief executive officer that is an executive officer of the reporting issuer; and
(ii) on behalf of the board of directors, by
(A) any two directors of the reporting issuer, other than the persons referred to in subparagraph (i) above, or
(B) if the issuer has only three directors, two of whom are the persons referred to in subparagraph (i), all of the directors of the reporting issuer.
2.2
News Release to AnnounceNotice of Filing -of 51-101F1 Information -- A reporting issuer must, concurrently with filing a statement and reports under section 2.1,disseminate a news release announcing that filing and indicating where a copy of the filed information can be found for viewing by electronic means.file with the securities regulatory authority a notice of filing of 51-101F1 information in accordance with Form 51-101F4.2.3 Inclusion in Annual Information Form -- The requirements of section 2.1 may be satisfied by including the information specified in section 2.1 in an annual information form filed within the time specified in section 2.1.
2.4 Reservation in Report of Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor
(1) If a qualified reserves evaluator or auditor cannot report on reserves data without reservation, the reporting issuer must ensure that the report of the qualified reserves evaluator or auditor prepared for the purpose of item 2 of section 2.1 sets out the cause of the reservation and the effect, if known to the qualified reserves evaluator or auditor, on the reserves data.
(2) A report containing a reservation, the cause of which can be removed by the reporting issuer, does not satisfy the requirements of item 2 of section 2.1.
2.5 Reporting Issuer Not a Corporation -- if the reporting issuer is not a corporation, a report in accordance with Form 51-101F3 must be signed by the persons who, in relation to the reporting issuer, are in a similar position or perform similar functions to the persons required to sign under item 3 of section 2.1.
PART 3 RESPONSIBILITIES OF REPORTING ISSUERSAND DIRECTORS
3.1 Interpretation -- A reference to a board of directors in this Part means, for a reporting issuer that does not have a board of directors, those individuals whose authority and duties in respect of that reporting issuer are similar to those of a board of directors.
3.2 Reporting Issuer to Appoint Independent Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor -- A reporting issuer must appoint one or more qualified reserves evaluators or auditors, each of whom is independent of the reporting issuer, to report to the board of directors of the reporting issuer on its reserves data.
3.3 Reporting Issuer to Make Information Available to Qualified Reserves Evaluator or Auditor -- A reporting issuer must make available to the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors that it appoints under section 3.2 all information reasonably necessary to enable the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors to provide a report that will satisfy the applicable requirements of this Instrument.
3.4 Certain Responsibilities of Board of Directors -- The board of directors of a reporting issuer must
(a) review, with reasonable frequency, the reporting issuer's procedures relating to the disclosure of information with respect to oil and gas activities, including its procedures for complying with the disclosure requirements and restrictions of this Instrument;
(b) review each appointment under section 3.2 and, in the case of any proposed change in such appointment, determine the reasons for the proposal and whether there have been disputes between the appointed qualified reserves evaluator or auditor and management of the reporting issuer;
(c) review, with reasonable frequency, the reporting issuer's procedures for providing information to the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors who report on reserves data for the purposes of this Instrument;
(d) before approving the filing of reserves data and the report of the qualified reserves evaluators or auditors thereon referred to in section 2.1, meet with management and each qualified reserves evaluator or auditor appointed under section 3.2, to
(i) determine whether any restrictions affect the ability of the qualified reserves evaluator or auditor to report on reserves data without reservation; and
(ii) review the reserves data and the report of the qualified reserves evaluator or auditor thereon; and
(e) review and approve
(i) the content and filing, under section 2.1, of the statement referred to in item 1 of section 2.1;
(ii) the filing, under section 2.1, of the report referred to in item 2 of section 2.1; and
(iii) the content and filing, under section 2.1, of the report referred to in item 3 of section 2.1.
3.5 Reserves Committee
(1) The board of directors of a reporting issuer may, subject to subsection (2), delegate the responsibilities set out in section 3.4 to a committee of the board of directors, provided that a majority of the members of the committee
(a) are individuals who are not and have not been, during the preceding 12 months:
(i) an officer or employee of the reporting issuer or of an affiliate of the reporting issuer;
(ii) a person who beneficially owns 10 percent or more of the outstanding voting securities of the reporting issuer; or
(iii) a relative of a person referred to in subparagraph (a)(i) or (ii), residing in the same home as that person; and
(b) are free from any business or other relationship which could reasonably be seen to interfere with the exercise of their independent judgement.
(2) Despite subsection (1), a board of directors of a reporting issuer must not delegate its responsibility under paragraph 3.4(e) to approve the content or the filing of information.
(3) A board of directors that has delegated responsibility to a committee pursuant to subsection (1) must solicit the recommendation of that committee as to whether to approve the content and filing of information for the purpose of paragraph 3.4(e).
3.6 repealed
PART 4 MEASUREMENT
4.1
Accounting Methods --A reporting issuer engaged in oil and gas activities that discloses financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP must userepealed
(a) the full cost method of accounting, applying CICA Accounting Guideline 16; or
(b) the successful efforts method of accounting, applying FAS 19.4.2 Consistency in Dates- The date or period with respect to which the effects of an event or transaction are recorded in a reporting issuer's annual financial statements must be the same as the date or period with respect to which they are first reflected in the reporting issuer's annual reserves data disclosure under Part 2.
PART 5 REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISCLOSURE
5.1 Application of Part 5 -- This Part applies to disclosure made by or on behalf of a reporting issuer
(a) to the public;
(b) in any document filed with a securities regulatory authority; or
(c) in other circumstances in which, at the time of making the disclosure, the reporting issuer knows, or ought reasonably to know, that the disclosure is or will become available to the public.
5.2 Disclosure of Reserves and Other Information -- If a reporting issuer makes disclosure of reserves or other information of a type that is specified in Form 51-101F1, the reporting issuer must ensure that the disclosure satisfies the following requirements:
(a) estimates of reserves or future net revenue must
(i) disclose the effective date of the estimate;
(ii) have been prepared or audited by a qualified reserves evaluator or auditor;
(iii) have been prepared or audited in accordance with the COGE Handbook;
(iv) have been made assuming that development of each property in respect of which the estimate is made will occur, without regard to the likely availability to the reporting issuer of funding required for that development; and
(v) in the case of estimates of possible reserves or related future net revenue disclosed in writing, also include a cautionary statement that is proximate to the estimate to the following effect:
"Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus possible reserves.";
(b) for the purpose of determining whether reserves should be attributed to a particular undrilled property, reasonably estimated future abandonment and reclamation costs related to the property must have been taken into account;
(c) in disclosing aggregate future net revenue the disclosure must comply with the requirements for the determination of future net revenue specified in Form 51-101F1; and
(d) the disclosure must be consistent with the corresponding information, if any, contained in the statement most recently filed by the reporting issuer with the securities regulatory authority under item 1 of section 2.1, except to the extent that the statement has been supplemented or superseded by a report of a material change{3} filed b